Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-09-2017, 09:59 AM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Question Internal reflection? trouble shooting suggestions

Hey everyone , i have had two imaging nights so far with my ASI1600mm, the first night i had some focuser tilt issues so i fixed that by tightening things up and then last night when i went shooting i noticed i had these strang ghost stars in my images. any idea what it might be and what steps i should take to try eliminate the issue?
im using a saxon ed 100, 0.85x ed 100 focal reducer and flatterer, ASI1600mm with filter wheel and the zwo off axis guider with a QHY5L 11. thanks guys
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-09-2017, 10:00 AM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
here the the images btw
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (22092701_1863692430313253_2087605288_o.jpg)
195.5 KB70 views
Click for full-size image (22095399_1863689210313575_971293716_o.jpg)
171.2 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-09-2017, 10:17 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrads View Post
Hey everyone , i have had two imaging nights so far with my ASI1600mm, the first night i had some focuser tilt issues so i fixed that by tightening things up and then last night when i went shooting i noticed i had these strang ghost stars in my images. any idea what it might be and what steps i should take to try eliminate the issue?
im using a saxon ed 100, 0.85x ed 100 focal reducer and flatterer, ASI1600mm with filter wheel and the zwo off axis guider with a QHY5L 11. thanks guys
The edges of the OAG will (may) cause some noticeable diffraction and reflection. Who knows how much? It would depend on alignment & other conditions....

There are 8 spikes (diffraction spikes) and fuzz around some of the brighter stars? You are using a refractor so I wouldn't have expected any diffraction spikes in the image, so look for some sharp edge/s in the optical path or near the edge of the path. Can you try to image WITH the OAG in place and WITHOUT the OAG in place? That might be something to rule out. Any obstruction (including an aperture stop in a lens) can cause such things, although the number of spikes and the look of the diffraction will vary.
Best
JA

Last edited by JA; 28-09-2017 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-09-2017, 10:30 AM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
The images do not appear to be in focus to me - I think you need to tighten this up as well.

Perhaps use a very short time, high gain exposure to get the focus itself better? Are you using any automation to help with focusing?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-09-2017, 11:07 AM
PKay's Avatar
PKay (Peter)
Registered User

PKay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: DEPOT BEACH
Posts: 1,643
I have ASI1600MC and field flattener.
The required distance between camera sensor and flattener is 55mm.
Without this, focus issues.
See diagram. Note the 6.5mm back focus to the sensor (included in the 55mm).
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ZWO spacing.pdf (329.1 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-09-2017, 12:31 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Hey everyone, thanks for the replies, yes i know diffraction spikes are not normal on a refractor, i dont mind them though since they are even. i do have a motorized focuser but these where just single test images and i wasnt to stressed about the focus. there are a few sharp edges with the spacers for my camera and OAG, is there some special sort of paint i can use to make sure they are not reflective?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-09-2017, 12:32 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
someone told me that light could be reflecting off the sensor or the filters? is this true? if that can happen i dont see how you can fix it
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-09-2017, 01:12 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrads View Post
someone told me that light could be reflecting off the sensor or the filters? is this true? if that can happen i dont see how you can fix it
Well, you can't fix it... maybe in final, retouch phase.
Or, try with combining couple of images taken at slightly different directions...
I had those too (Canon FD 400mm F/2.8), and knowing what they are, I am simply ignoring them.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:00 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
hmmm interesting, ill be really disappointed if it is something that can not be fixed, how do you go about dealing with them? i get one of those glowy patches for each bright star
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:17 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
May be worth trying a circular polarising filter in the train....these effective suppress reflections between glass elements - works very well with "problem" set-ups for solar imaging where reflections can be a real PITA!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:26 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Hi, I just had a look of your 2 images.

The Halo around Alnitak (in the horsehead image), is a reflection off the camera window. Alnitak is so bright it bounces off the chips' cover glass onto the camera window glass and then back to the chip out of focus thus it becomes a halo.
As Bojan explained you can rub it out in post processing, but its a pain in the neck to do. Alternatively you can remove the glass window on the CCD and re-install it slightly tilted. Like windscreens on cars are tilted to stop headlights reflecting back into oncoming traffic.

Above Alnitak is what looks like a football and you see it in the Pleiades image, I thinks this is a dust bunny. A speck of dust on the camera windows, or on a filter.

As for the spikes, no idea where they are coming from.

There you go, my 2c worth.

Cheers
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:34 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
merlin ill have a google see what i can find out about those filters
billdan, ah ok now i know what the hales are thank you! with the dust bunnies however, they move around the imaging depending on where the bright star is? would dust do that? also when combined with LRGB one glow dot has red blue and green at slightly different positions
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:38 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
i found this on a site and it looks very similar to the glow spot i have, but the site doesnt explain what it is or how to fix it
http://www.darkerview.com/CCDProblem...reflection.php
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Capture.JPG)
17.8 KB9 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:43 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Dust bunnies don't normally move around. If you were to take a flat frame this would confirm whether or not dust bunnies are present.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:44 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,940
Here is mine (greenish blob).. taken with Canon FD 400mm f/2/8 (@f/4) and Canon 60D
I believe it was due to flat front glass, which I removed.
Not sure if it's still there as I haven't done bright stars recently.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Horse_sd.jpg)
200.8 KB15 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:44 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
ah yes not dust bunnies then, i cleaned my scope before use and took a flat to test. it was perfectly clean
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:45 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Here is mine..
I believe it was due to flat front glass, which I removed.
Not sure if it's still there as haven't done bright stars recently.
ah very nice bojan, i can see the difference in the haloes for sure, but you still have that green dot on the other side of the horse head which is what i assume is the same as mine
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-09-2017, 02:56 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Alex, if you want to get technical this is the maths for working out where the offending dust bunny or reflection is coming from.

d = (p x FR x diam) / 1000

d = Distance from CCD (mm)
p = pixel size (microns)
FR = Focal Ratio
diam = diameter of reflection or dust bunny in pixels
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-09-2017, 03:10 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
Alex, if you want to get technical this is the maths for working out where the offending dust bunny or reflection is coming from.

d = (p x FR x diam) / 1000

d = Distance from CCD (mm)
p = pixel size (microns)
FR = Focal Ratio
diam = diameter of reflection or dust bunny in pixels
awesome, i gave this a try,
pixal = 3.8mirconmeter
FR=765
Diam of bunny=140pixals? using photoshops ruler tool? its oval so i dont know which way to measure.
and i get that the bunny is being made 400mm from the sensor. hmmmmm
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-09-2017, 03:24 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Your FR is 7.65 not 765.

Then 3.8 x 7.65 x 140 / 1000 = 4.06 mm

But that doesn't sound right either, as the CCD window on the ASI1600 is 6.5mm from the chip

You may have to rotate the image slightly to get a better reading on the oval shape, but its pretty close to 6.5mm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement