Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-05-2016, 10:18 PM
StephenRH (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenRH is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kaitaia, New Zealand
Posts: 21
Polarising Filter

I am getting a decent sized Dob made by Peter Read, SDM Telescopes, VIC, Australia. 28" f/3.3. I will be using it some of the time to show school students and parents the Moon and Planets. This telescope will have a pretty strong light grasp. Do I need to get a Polarising Filter to cut down the light when showing them the Moon?

I would really appreciate hearing back for anyone who has biggish Dob.

I will post photos when the scope arrives.

Thanks

Stephen
Pukemaru Observatory
341 Snelgar Road, RD 2
Kaitaia, New Zealand 0482
+173° 20' 07.67" -35° 05' 39.52"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2016, 11:39 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
I found I needed it with my 16" dob so I would say definitely for a much larger one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2016, 12:41 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Many people use one with a 6 or 8" scope, so I would say that its a
no brainer.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2016, 02:50 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
For public viewing nights a brightness reducing filter is useful. Crossed polarisers are good but an ND filter is easier to work with. ND's are also more readily available in 2" format.

It's worth noting that the surface brightness of the Moon's image and the amount of Moonlight hitting the retina per unit area depends only on the exit pupil and not on the aperture of the scope. Of course, for a given exit pupil, a bigger scope will yield a larger image. A 28" is big enough to just about fill one's field of view with the face of the Moon at the full brightness of 7mm exit pupil.

Some folks get alarmed about eye damage when looking at the Moon through a large telescope. But this can never happen. Even at max, ~7mm, exit pupil, Moonlight through any scope is not as bright as clear sky in daylight. It's just the contrast between the Moon and the darkness of night that gets you. For serious Moon observing you can pick up more detail without a filter. Downside of course is that you won't be able to observe much else for several minutes afterwards.

Last edited by janoskiss; 05-05-2016 at 03:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2016, 09:36 AM
StephenRH (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenRH is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kaitaia, New Zealand
Posts: 21
Polarising Filters

Thanks to those who have replied. Much appreciated. I will get one. I see Amazon is selling these in the 2" size. The telescope will have filter slider and I will be able dot screw it in.
Interesting comment about not being able to look at anything else for a while. It's bad enough just looking at Jupiter with my 12", let alone a Full Moon.
Thanks again
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2016, 11:30 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
I personally have never used a filter on the moon with any size scope.
I just look through the eyepiece from about 150mm away, and move closer over a period of around 10secs, by which time my eye is quite comfortable.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2016, 08:14 PM
Renato1 (Renato)
Registered User

Renato1 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Frankston South
Posts: 1,263
A polarising filter alone won't cut the light down enough when viewing the moon to make it comfortable. Two polarising filters rotated around to get maximum light cut-out will be better - but when I've tried it, it made the image a tad mushier than that with a single equivalent Neutral Density filter.

That said, I've never looked at the moon in a 28" telescope. You may well need two dark ND filters.
Regards,
Renato
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2016, 12:05 PM
StephenRH (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenRH is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kaitaia, New Zealand
Posts: 21
Thanks, Renato. I have been looking at the Orion 5562 2-Inch Variable Polarizing Filter which does exactly what you say. I do have a ND Filter so I might just try that before I get the polarising filter.
One thing I know - I won't try looking at 16th magnitude stars just after I have looked at the Moon!

Kind regards
Stephen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post
Two polarising filters rotated around to get maximum light cut-out will be better - but when I've tried it, it made the image a tad mushier than that with a single equivalent Neutral Density filter.
Renato
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement