Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 16-04-2019, 06:41 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by gb44 View Post
Very nice Lee.

Why did you go for the ZWO178mini for the guide cam?

GlennB
Thanks Glenn :-)

I use the QHY178M for the main imaging camera and the ZWO 174 mini for guiding. I'm not 100% sure which one you're asking about, so I'll answer both :-)

I use the QHY178M for my imaging camera because it provides great resolution (in terms of arc-seconds per pixel) with my scope, has low read noise, reasonable number of pixels, and field of view which suits me well since I mostly image galaxies.

I use the ASI174 mini guide cam because it has a good form factor which means it doesn't get in the way of my focuser or anything, it has reasonable size pixels, moderate read noise (reasonably low at high gain), but most importantly because it has a pretty big sensor for a guide cam, which makes it easier to find a guide star and since I use an OAG, that's very important.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-04-2019, 08:31 PM
gb44 (Glenn)
Registered User

gb44 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 275
Thanks Lee.
And thanks for the inspiration too.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 17-04-2019, 06:15 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post
Thanks Allan :-)

With the Paracorr I think it's closer to 1000mm (989.39mm according to plate solving), but your point still stands.

I think it's more about aperture and sampling (e.g. arc seconds per pixel) than focal length as such, you don't really need a large focal length these days with such small pixels on cameras.



Hi Lee,
I'm aware of the smaller pixels but it is still remarkable.


cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 17-04-2019, 09:56 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
Very nice detail Lee, the dust lanes are showing up really nicely
Always like your star colours
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 17-04-2019, 12:16 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Lee,
I'm aware of the smaller pixels but it is still remarkable.


cheers
Allan
Cheers Allan :-) I hope I didn't come off as patronising, it wasn't my intention, was just trying to get across the point that you don't need big focal lengths these days, technology is changing things on us again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Very nice detail Lee, the dust lanes are showing up really nicely
Always like your star colours
Thanks Colin! :-) That's one of the areas I think I could improve this... the large stars could probably do with some more colour, and some of the smaller ones could probably do with a bit less.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 17-04-2019, 12:17 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by gb44 View Post
Thanks Lee.
And thanks for the inspiration too.
No probs Glenn! :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement