Hi Steve,
and hi Bill.
I don't know much about astrophotography, or the aptitude of the 5SE OTA for this use. I believe it is F10, Schmidt Cassegrain, if that makes any difference?
Am I correct in saying it is OK for planetary photography, but not so much for DSO's?
(I remember Paul H used to do some amazing planetary imaging with his old F10 C9.25 - albeit on a dedicated EQ mount)
But I do know a little about the little brother, the 4SE, and last I heard, the 4SE and 5SE were supplied on the same
Tripod.
And that tripod has a "Built In" Wedge.
This would actually allow your 5SE to be used in Equatorial mode, as I understand it.
And so, the mount allows for equatorial tracking in Sidereal Mode.
A shortcoming may be the fact that the mount, while computerised, is only a single arm mount. This may make it a little unsteady, especially in windy conditions?
As I said, I am unsure how good it would be for photography, I don't remember hearing too many people singing its praises for this purpose.
found on a cloudy nights discussion thread:
Quote:
The first problem inherent in all the SE mounts is the use of spur gears which produces a lot of backlash. The slop in the gears makes it impossible for the mount to do the precise tracking needed for long exposures.
The second problem is that while the mount has a wedge, there are no fine adjustments to let you accurately polar align it. Adjusting the altitude of the wedge is done by just tilting the mount by hand and tightening a screw agains the riser bar. Adjusting the azimuth of the wedge is even worse since the only way to do it is to pick the entire tripod up and turn it.
|