Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-03-2015, 03:01 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
How Heavy is the TOA130 ?

I've seen this question about the weight of the TOA130 being bandied about for some time, turns out it is a rather heavy bit of kit........ no surprises there .....

TOA130S stripped down 8330 grams
Dewshield 1110 grams
Objective Cap 111 grams
Tube Counterweight 1600 grams
Clamshell 1785 grams
7x50 Finder&bracket 657 grams
2" Visual back 143 grams
Zeiss Prism & ClickLock 331 grams
SUBTOTAL 14,067 grams

Additional:
Robin Casady 14" Dovetail 831 grams
Average Eyepieces 300 grams

So close to 15Kg it doesn't matter

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2015, 03:24 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
Hmmm, Opt Corp info says it weighs 22lbs:

http://www.optcorp.com/telescopes/re...telescope.html

must be a bit of sales deflation speak.

What mount would you be using?

I know its not a TAK but the ES ED127 APO Triplet (with Hoya glass) in carbon fibre weighs only 14lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2015, 03:53 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Hmmm, Opt Corp info says it weighs 22lbs:
must be a bit of sales deflation speak.
What mount would you be using?
I know its not a TAK but the ES ED127 APO Triplet (with Hoya glass) in carbon fibre weighs only 14lbs.
22 lbs is 9.98Kg which is pretty close to the correct weight for the OTA and Dewshield with the visual back and extension tube. The tube balancing ring and clamshell add a lot.

It would be interesting to see the ES127 actually weighed on good scales.

I am only using the scope for visual and have it mounted on the T-Rex on a Berlebach Planet so about 38Kg all up. It is a definite 2-trip minimum.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2015, 04:10 PM
Allan's Avatar
Allan
Registered User

Allan is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 937
You're right Matt, that sounds quite heavy. I would hate to see you hurt yourself carrying that around so I am more than willing to take it off your hands if you want to send it to me. It's the least I can do.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2015, 04:20 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Thanks Allan, so kind an offer, alas I have to decline.

I would be very interested to see actual weights of other scopes when fitted with the finder, visual back, diagonal and means of attaching to mount. I think a lot of people would get a surprise what their 'lightweights' actually weigh.

For instance the white tube ES127ED OTA is listed at 22 pounds or 9.98 Kg same as the TOA !!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2015, 05:48 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
With larger refractors the weight location is often a problem. My iStar 127 f12 has all of its weight out at the front, even after I add the diagonal and EP (the Moonlight was probably a bad idea from the standpoint of balance). On the NEQ6 most of the scope is hanging off the back, and I am sitting on the ground even with the tripod at maximum height. I need to find some counter-weights.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2015, 07:21 PM
MattT's Avatar
MattT
Reflecting on Refracting

MattT is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,215
15kg's…that's a lightweight. Whatya worried about!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2015, 07:38 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Tak FC-100 doublet (1988 model):

This is a total imaging weight, consisting of:
OTA

6x30 finder

9x50 guidescope with custom helical focuser and Lodestar, plus custom solid rings, Vixen bar and Vixen clamp attached to Tak clamshell top

Tak clamshell with custom Tak to Vixen adapter head

SBIG St-2000XM with 5 position CFW9v2 with 5 Baader filters

Appropriate spacers (and soon to be added Tak reducer)

All up: 6.9kg

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-03-2015, 12:08 AM
Exfso's Avatar
Exfso (Peter)
Registered User

Exfso is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,699
My TOA130F weighs a tad more than the 2.7" focuser I previously had. That was 10kg bare bones. I know it is a heavy bugger to lug around. The 4" focuser definitely adds more weight. They are also very nose heavy due to the monster slabs of glass at the front. There is no tube counteweight on the 130F either, obviously because of the added weight of the larger focuser. I know I queried this when I received it and that was Tak's response.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-03-2015, 07:34 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
Sorry Matt, correction, I was not complaining about the total weight for its size but rather the over-balance towards the front.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-03-2015, 12:08 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Sorry Matt, correction, I was not complaining about the total weight for its size but rather the over-balance towards the front.
I think the same goes for almost all triplets with standard focusers. I am hoping that with the binoviewers and 2 eyepieces I can dispense with the tube weight, otherwise I might have to give it to Allan.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-03-2015, 06:57 PM
Allan's Avatar
Allan
Registered User

Allan is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunama View Post
I think the same goes for almost all triplets with standard focusers. I am hoping that with the binoviewers and 2 eyepieces I can dispense with the tube weight, otherwise I might have to give it to Allan.
That's sweet, I can see you are starting to come around to my way of thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-03-2015, 07:28 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,425
See, those 'fracs all look so pretty I thought they contained some anti-gravity, but clearly not

My C11 HD with dovetail, diagonal and a nice heavy 2" eyepiece clocks in about the same 15kg.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-03-2015, 08:15 AM
issdaol (Phil)
Registered User

issdaol is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 688
Hi Matt,

If its anything like my TOA150 then it's pretty hard to get a good balance without the the tube counterweight.

I though I could do the same but it just became way to hard to balance. So if I move mine, I quickly take of the tube counterweight, then move the OTA and setup then put it back on and balance.

On my TREX the tube counterweight needs to sit right at the back of the OTA but once that is done it is perfectly balanced and I can move the tube to any position with the clutches loose and it will stay in that spot unless I move it again.

I'm amazed how smooth the modded TREX is with this load :-)

If you want to take it to a dark site regularly close to Canberra feel free to call me and you are welcome to pop out to my property out of town.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement