ANZAC Day
Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-08-2016, 04:13 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Sharpless 2-71

Hi to all

Sh 2-71 is a complex planetary nebula in Aquila that I haven't come across before. I had problems with gradients and of course the weather. This part of the sky isn't all that great for me because you are starting to pick up more of the Canberra light pollution. I think the STXL6303 would have been a better camera to use for this one too.

Cheers

Steve

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/S...11002_RC14.htm
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Sh2-71_STXl11002_RC14_HaOIIILRGB_small2.jpg)
144.9 KB69 views

Last edited by Stevec35; 28-08-2016 at 04:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-08-2016, 04:50 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
That's a very interesting little object, Steve! I haven't seen it before.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-08-2016, 05:01 PM
topheart
Registered User

topheart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,087
That's an awesome capture of a very interesting planetary Steve!

Very well done.
Cheers,
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-08-2016, 05:07 PM
Tony_ (Tony)
Registered User

Tony_ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 465
Nice one Steve.

I tried this one last year - but nowhere near enough exposure time. I might try it again sometime - your image is excellent. It's a very nice looking PN and not often imaged.

Tony.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-08-2016, 05:27 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_ View Post
Nice one Steve.

I tried this one last year - but nowhere near enough exposure time. I might try it again sometime - your image is excellent. It's a very nice looking PN and not often imaged.

Tony.
Thanks Tony. I think the reason it isn't often imaged is that there are several other nice planetaries in Aquila, NGC6781 for example.

Quote:
Originally Posted by topheart View Post
That's an awesome capture of a very interesting planetary Steve!

Very well done.
Cheers,
Tim
Thanks Tim

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
That's a very interesting little object, Steve! I haven't seen it before.
Thanks Rick. Neither had I. I was just looking for something different and came across it. It's mentioned in the second edition of Hartung.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-08-2016, 09:19 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Aaah yes, Marilyn's Lips Nebula

Nice work, another object I considered hitting...so thanks, I won't bother now, yours looks good

Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (marilyn-monroe-red-lips.jpg)
136.0 KB5 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-08-2016, 10:17 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
Very nice little PN Steve
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-08-2016, 10:33 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Very nice little PN Steve
Thanks Colin. It's actually not all that little for a planetary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Aaah yes, Marilyn's Lips Nebula

Nice work, another object I considered hitting...so thanks, I won't bother now, yours looks good

Mike
Good grief Mike - where do you get these names from? I can see the resemblance though. Thanks for the comments. Actually if you changed your mind about imaging it you could probably incorporate a good bit of the adjacent nebulosity Sh 2-72 with your wider field.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-08-2016, 10:50 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
What? You're branching out from the tiny objects
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-08-2016, 11:07 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
What? You're branching out from the tiny objects
I have been known to image a few big things from time to time but there certainly have been a lot of planetaries. I still won't touch anything smaller than about 40" though.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-08-2016, 11:56 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35 View Post
Thanks Colin. It's actually not all that little for a planetary.



Good grief Mike - where do you get these names from? I can see the resemblance though. Thanks for the comments. Actually if you changed your mind about imaging it you could probably incorporate a good bit of the adjacent nebulosity Sh 2-72 with your wider field.
A good imagination...

Actually, with my SX H694 on the AG12 I only have about 38' X 32' so close to yours really

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-08-2016, 04:20 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post

Actually, with my SX H694 on the AG12 I only have about 38' X 32' so close to yours really

Mike
Okay - thought it was bigger
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-08-2016, 04:31 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
I've always thought of this one in Aquila as being the number 3.

Super good image.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-08-2016, 04:38 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
I've always thought of this one in Aquila as being the number 3.

Super good image.
Thanks M&T. I must admit I can't see the number 3 though.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-08-2016, 05:25 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,064
I call this nebula the Question Mark nebula when I had an abbreviated go at it last year.

There's another interpretation for you.

Good to see a completed one though - looks good.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-08-2016, 05:29 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,138
Steve,that's a beaut objrectwell done.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-08-2016, 10:35 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Steve,that's a beaut objrectwell done.
Thanks Louie. I still think it would have been better with the 6303 though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
I call this nebula the Question Mark nebula when I had an abbreviated go at it last year.

There's another interpretation for you.

Good to see a completed one though - looks good.
Thanks Chris. Can't see a question mark either.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 30-08-2016, 09:22 PM
Maurice's Avatar
Maurice
Registered User

Maurice is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 436
That's a great image Steve.
Nice PN that I haven't looked at before.

Cheers
Maurice
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 30-08-2016, 09:43 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice View Post
That's a great image Steve.
Nice PN that I haven't looked at before.

Cheers
Maurice
Thanks Maurice. It was a first for me too.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-09-2016, 07:34 PM
Flugel88's Avatar
Flugel88 (Michael)
Registered User

Flugel88 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 253
Very nice Planetary Steve new to me never seen before.You managed to pull some nice detail out of the tiny object.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement