#1  
Old 04-07-2015, 05:04 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
f/8 enough?

Is f/8 at least starting to be sufficient for galaxy imaging? I have an FSQ-106 with all the extras - reducer and extender, so I run the gammut of f/3.65, f/5 to f/8.

I did image some GX with the FS78 at native f/8 and the detail, scale and resolution seemed OK.

Opinions appreciated. Of course, I cannot bolt on ANOTHER extender to make it f/12.8....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-07-2015, 05:46 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Lewis,

I'd be looking at your image scale rather than f/ratio to decide if you've got the right set up for imaging galaxies. Of course, aperture will determine how long it takes to capture decent SNR

A FSQ-106 @ f/8 would be OK for the larger galaxy targets. With drizzle you'll get halfway decent resolution. It will need a fair amount of capture time to get a quality image.

If you want to go for more exotic targets then larger aperture is needed unless you have a lot of good sky time and patience.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2015, 07:55 PM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Lewis,

I'd be looking at your image scale rather than f/ratio to decide if you've got the right set up for imaging galaxies. Of course, aperture will determine how long it takes to capture decent SNR

A FSQ-106 @ f/8 would be OK for the larger galaxy targets. With drizzle you'll get halfway decent resolution. It will need a fair amount of capture time to get a quality image.

If you want to go for more exotic targets then larger aperture is needed unless you have a lot of good sky time and patience.

Cheers,
Rick.
Which is why I built the RN 8F8 Newt. 8" at F8. Weather has been extremely uncooperative for testing and I am build a guiding solution for it but some unguided 20 sec frames @ 1600 ISO on Eta C gave me a much better SNR in a fraction of the time. Enough for me to pull quite good results off a single frame. It seems to handle a 2" Barlow well ( F16 !! ) so the combo should give me some capability with smaller targets, planetary and DSO. F8 also gives me an almost coma free FOV and it's proved to be a very good mirror.

It's a sod in the Ob though, being 1600 long it nearly touches the walls
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2015, 04:02 AM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
depends on the camera Lewis. If you have small pixels, 800mm fl will give OK pixel scale, but it is not suitable (for galaxies) with large pixels. The 100mm aperture is small enough that it will slightly degrade the resolution in very good seeing and CA will probably also limit the resolution a bit.

at f8 and with small pixels, the system will be fairly insensitive and that will mean extended imaging times.

As Rick suggested, you should still be able to get good images of the bigger, brighter galaxies in acceptable time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:03 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Got the FSQ106N at F/15 a couple of times and I could do 2min subs in Ha with good SNR. They are incredibly sharp scopes with no scattering and very good light gathering. I don't anticipate you'll see any major difference at F/8 from prime focus if you use a quality barlow or the Tak extender.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:24 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Will be using the Tak Q extender.

Wanna trade your 106N for my 106ED? (I'll include the reducer and extender)

Appreciate the input all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:31 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Will be using the Tak Q extender.

Wanna trade your 106N for my 106ED? (I'll include the reducer and extender)

Appreciate the input all.
I've finally got all my adapters done. Fat chance now. I'm not going through it all again. I'll stick with it
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:43 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
I personally try not to get stuck on f/ratio. You're always going to be sacrificing resolution (image scale) imaging speed unless you're willing to spend the money buying large fast scope.

Even if you need to increase it to f/20 and its corrected, go for it! It'll take longer to get your SNR up but you'll get what you want. Most of my research over the years has been done on an f/10 with no issues and I've even considered pushing that to ~f/40 for planetary imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:47 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
I've finally got all my adapters done. Fat chance now. I'm not going through it all again. I'll stick with it
Pas probleme - I would include a buzzilion adapters (tubes, clamps etc). You would need to acquire nothing.

Just a thought....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2015, 08:48 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I personally try not to get stuck on f/ratio. You're always going to be sacrificing resolution (image scale) imaging speed unless you're willing to spend the money buying large fast scope.

Even if you need to increase it to f/20 and its corrected, go for it! It'll take longer to get your SNR up but you'll get what you want. Most of my research over the years has been done on an f/10 with no issues and I've even considered pushing that to ~f/40 for planetary imaging.

WOnder - with the FSQ extended to f/8 and then use a 2x barlow, making it F/16.... nah, wouldn't come to focus I am sure anyway
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-07-2015, 09:00 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Pas probleme - I would include a buzzilion adapters (tubes, clamps etc). You would need to acquire nothing.

Just a thought....
What's wrong with the ED? You have more back focus and you can use the reducer. win-win.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2015, 09:09 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
WOnder - with the FSQ extended to f/8 and then use a 2x barlow, making it F/16.... nah, wouldn't come to focus I am sure anyway
Get one of these and never look back. People say it's an expensive barlow but my argument is the following.

1_ It's a fluorite quadruplet with zero light scattering.
2_ It's light weight, super short and gives you a 90mm imaging circle.
3_ You get magnification from x3 to x8 by just adding tubes and it doesn't change your back-focus.

Now if you think about the money, how much would an assortment of Barlows/Powermates to cover the same range of magnification cost you? Would it be the same quality as well? Easier to use? How heavy is a x5 powermate?

The decision for me was a no brainer. Even if at the time I bought it, it was four times the price of the scope I used it on. But hey, I still got it, I use it all the time and it just works. And I saved a lot of money.

I always say measure twice, cut once.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2015, 04:20 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
I had been contemplating that Marc (it's $300 cheaper to buy it from Teleskop Express than from AP).

I may do it one day... after we recover from the European vacation the wife and Daughter No1 are taking right now.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-07-2015, 04:21 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
What's wrong with the ED? You have more back focus and you can use the reducer. win-win.
Nothing wrong with the ED... you know me and fluorite though
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-07-2015, 04:38 PM
pluto's Avatar
pluto (Hugh)
Astro Noob

pluto is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
Lewis I have a similar image scale to you, 900mm with an 8300 chip (you use an 8300 don't you?). I've only imaged a few larger galaxies - M83, Sculptor, Cen A, NGC300, Leo triplet - but I think it's pretty good for the occasions I'm under dark skies and can image something other than emission nebulae through NB filters
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement