Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-05-2018, 12:29 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Messier 88

From Wiki "Messier 88 (also known as M88 or NGC 4501) is a spiral galaxy about 50 to 60 million light-years away in the constellation Coma Berenices. It was discovered by Charles Messier in 1781.

The supermassive black hole at the core of this galaxy has 107.9 solar masses, or about 80 million times the mass of the Sun."

Worth putting up with all the annoying sat trails to get it I think.
GSO 10" F4 Newtonian, Canon 1100D full spectrum, Baader MPCC MKIII, Baader UV/IR cut filter, 553 x 45 seconds or about 6.9 hours unguided, Heq5 Pro.

Larger field at Astrobin with satellite galaxies.
----> https://astrob.in/346978/B/
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M88_553f_sb.jpg)
136.7 KB111 views

Last edited by cometcatcher; 16-05-2018 at 01:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-05-2018, 07:28 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Lots of detail in that little galaxy Kevin. 553 subs? A feat in itself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-05-2018, 07:37 AM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
A lovely galaxy far, far away
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-05-2018, 07:38 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
Very nice details in the arms indeed. Top shot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-05-2018, 09:45 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff45 View Post
Lots of detail in that little galaxy Kevin. 553 subs? A feat in itself.
Thanks Geoff! You can never have too many subs! lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
A lovely galaxy far, far away
Thanks Lewis! Probably has a death star at the core.

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Very nice details in the arms indeed. Top shot.
Thanks Marc! Yes there's a few dust lanes showing up. First time I've imaged this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-05-2018, 10:17 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Very nice, Kevin! Stars look just a little elongated? [Update: just noticed it was unguided. Doh!]

Last edited by RickS; 16-05-2018 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-05-2018, 10:24 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,894
A pretty image.
Greg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-05-2018, 10:29 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Lovely looking galaxy Kevin, a bit of star trailing from being unguided, but its the galaxy that's on show.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-05-2018, 10:50 AM
archioptic's Avatar
archioptic (Nathan)
Registered User

archioptic is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albury
Posts: 79
So much detail in those spiral arms, nice one! I especially like the wider field you linked to with all those other galaxies.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-05-2018, 10:55 AM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,441
Nice one Kevin, good to see older DSLRs are still holding up against the more popular CCD cameras that are available today. I'll probably end up purchasing one eventually if my interest in the hobby lasts long enough to justify one. In the meantime, I'm happy with the quality my Canon 550d produces today.

553 subs, my computer would have well and truly crashed before it could stack anywhere near that many images! Bonus points for that too.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-05-2018, 11:54 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Very nice, Kevin! Stars look just a little elongated? [Update: just noticed it was unguided. Doh!]
Thanks Rick,. Yes there is some elongation of the brighter stars. It's probably caused from a couple of reasons, but the main one I figured out to be mirror shock. I can't lock the mirror up on this camera, and when it flips up it causes a diagonal streak on bright objects. I had a good example on my hard drive but I lost it. There's a few things I can do to minimize it which I am working on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
A pretty image.
Greg
Thanks Greg! I'm just in it for the pretty pictures.

Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
Lovely looking galaxy Kevin, a bit of star trailing from being unguided, but its the galaxy that's on show.
Thanks Bill!

Quote:
Originally Posted by archioptic View Post
So much detail in those spiral arms, nice one! I especially like the wider field you linked to with all those other galaxies.
Some of the other galaxies are worth investigation on their own with a bigger scope I reckon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickoid View Post
Nice one Kevin, good to see older DSLRs are still holding up against the more popular CCD cameras that are available today. I'll probably end up purchasing one eventually if my interest in the hobby lasts long enough to justify one. In the meantime, I'm happy with the quality my Canon 550d produces today.

553 subs, my computer would have well and truly crashed before it could stack anywhere near that many images! Bonus points for that too.
Thanks Michael! I would also like a dedicated astro camera, but money has become tight so I'm kind of stuck with what I've got at the moment. But I do need one sooner or later as this many subs will eventually kill the DSLR. The PC however seems quite happy stacking this many without a problem as I have done many times in the past. Even if I do get a CMOS astro cam I will probably continue stacking lots of short subs. Too many clouds where I live for long subs.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-05-2018, 12:37 PM
gaseous's Avatar
gaseous (Patrick)
Registered User

gaseous is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post

The supermassive black hole at the core of this galaxy has 107.9 solar masses, or about 80 million times the mass of the Sun."
Apologies for what is no doubt a gumby question, but how does 107.9 solar masses equate to 80 million times the mass of the sun? My brain tells me that 107.9 solar masses would be 107.9 times the mass of the sun. Am I missing something remarkably obvious?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-05-2018, 12:50 PM
archioptic's Avatar
archioptic (Nathan)
Registered User

archioptic is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albury
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaseous View Post
Apologies for what is no doubt a gumby question, but how does 107.9 solar masses equate to 80 million times the mass of the sun? My brain tells me that 107.9 solar masses would be 107.9 times the mass of the sun. Am I missing something remarkably obvious?
You're right, I think Kevin meant 10^7.9 which is just under 80 million solar masses
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-05-2018, 01:15 PM
gaseous's Avatar
gaseous (Patrick)
Registered User

gaseous is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 782
Cheers, that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-05-2018, 01:30 PM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,097
Breaking the mould, unguided and a DSLR!

Nice work!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-05-2018, 04:53 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by archioptic View Post
You're right, I think Kevin meant 10^7.9 which is just under 80 million solar masses
Yeah something went wrong in the copy and paste from wiki.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16-05-2018, 11:44 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
Breaking the mould, unguided and a DSLR!

Nice work!
Thanks Bart! I don't think DSLR's are much worse than an OSC astro cam, except in the middle of summer when noise becomes a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-05-2018, 08:39 AM
topheart
Registered User

topheart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,087
Excellent!
Cheers,
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-05-2018, 10:28 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Thanks Tim, glad you like it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 18-05-2018, 10:14 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Great field, Kevin, lots to see and some very nice detail on the star of the show!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement