Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 16-10-2020, 08:48 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hinchinbrook
Posts: 19,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulloch View Post
If you don't use an IR cut filter, then the RGB channels will be swamped with IR and the planet's colours will be incorrect. Here is some more information on that (written for the ASI224MC, but also applicable for the 462 as the IR sensitivity is even higher). The 462 has an IR transparent window, so you need to get an IR cut filter for colour imaging (I just bought the ZWO IR cut filter when I bought the camera).
https://www.planetary-astronomy-and-...lter-asi224mc/

The 462 sensor is more sensitive than the next best sensor (the 224MC which I have), it has a lower noise level (0.5e vs 0.8e) and the smaller pixels mean that its best focal ratio is f/15 rather than f/20.

The maths which shows how the focal ratio = 5x the pixel size of the camera is determined is attached. Don't worry about the Bintel sampling tool, as mentioned above it's designed for DSOs not planetary.

Andrew
Cool. Some more reading to do. I have various IR cut filters. Will fit one in the light path next session. You've mentioned the ideal focal ratio before. Will check that out too. To date I have gone as long as the optics and mount allow me which is ~8m @ 200mm aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 17-10-2020, 01:50 PM
evltoy (Wayne)
Registered User

evltoy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 18
this is all very good information & more then what I was anticipating.

I think I'll go with the 462. With the IR cut filter, I only need this if I'm planning to just view the object on my screen, but for recording I would remove the IR filter?

Cheers
Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 17-10-2020, 02:04 PM
Ittaku (Con)
Registered User

Ittaku is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by evltoy View Post
this is all very good information & more then what I was anticipating.

I think I'll go with the 462. With the IR cut filter, I only need this if I'm planning to just view the object on my screen, but for recording I would remove the IR filter?
You have to use the IR filter for capturing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Limpet Controller
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement