#1  
Old 29-04-2010, 05:57 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
White balance in Astrophotography

On the Canon camera's (and most others) there are preset white-balances for daylight, shade, cloud, tungsten, fluro, flash and a custom WB function as well.

Now, while these are pretty easy to grasp, and adjust according to different types of terrestrial lighting, when shooting through a telescope at deep space objects or planets, how relevant are these settings? Is there an optimal WB to choose for all astrophotography or does it change according to the target? I would imagine it would not change.

Does it change if you shoot in RAW or JPEG?

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-04-2010, 06:04 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,280
Baz,

I believe you can make a custom WB by simply taking a shot
of white card in pure sunlight.

A custom WB should transfer and work well with deep sky, maybe better
than a camera suggested default WB.

Having said all that, I've never done it myself.

It's been brought up a few times here on IIS.

Just type in custom white balance.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-04-2010, 06:14 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Thanks Steve, Yes, I suppose it make sense to do this in midday sun as the sun is a star, as are the others.

However, not all stars give off a white/yellow light. We see things on our earth with eyes used to seeing colours under this light as "normal". If you get away from our star by say...1500 light years, what is the true colour and what becomes the new "normal" white balance?

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-04-2010, 06:33 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
Thanks Steve, Yes, I suppose it make sense to do this in midday sun as the sun is a star, as are the others.

However, not all stars give off a white/yellow light. We see things on our earth with eyes used to seeing colours under this light as "normal". If you get away from our star by say...1500 light years, what is the true colour and what becomes the new "normal" white balance?

Baz.
Baz,

not being anywhere near an expert but it comes down to your eyes.
Your eyes have evolved to be sensitive to a certain bandwidth of
light frequencies. Monitors try to display a picture faithfully according to
your eye's characteristic sensitivity curve....or white balance.

Emulsion film...and digital CCDS have also a curve applied to attempt
to display this same curve.

Obviously, if the end receiver is your eyeballs, stuck in front of
a monitor, and any one of the devices used to capture, detect, store,
manipulate and ultimately display it for your eyeball has a different
curve...then it will be a distorted end result.
It makes sense to capture Deep Sky as close as possible to a
generic or custom WB setting...and the easiest way is white card in
sunlight.
I hope this sorta makes sense...

Just one more thing: my ccd camera has a unique sensitivity curve which
may be way off the curve of a typical eyeball.
The easiest way to tune in or calibrate my camera's RGB curves to white
light is to calibrate it on G2V stars....they give off Sun-like light
Every high-end astro imager (count me out) has probably done a G2V
calibration of their sensor, or at least, knows the calibration settings.

Last edited by kinetic; 29-04-2010 at 06:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-04-2010, 06:39 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
It does mate, it does.

Thank you Steve.

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-04-2010, 06:00 AM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
If you're not using something like a light pollution filter, I reckon set it to "daylight". If you do use a LP filter, I reckon shoot a neutral graycard in daylight and use that. They're good starting points. But that being said, when you process your images we muck around so much with black points, white point, and the channels that it probably doesn't really make that much difference in the end because it ends up being a processing custom white balance job anyway by default.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-04-2010, 06:57 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Cool bananas Troy. That sounds like good advice. Not sure if it has any bearing on an Orion camera, but certainly for the DSLR.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2010, 02:44 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
I use one of my flats as a custom white balance for my 1000d. I use a CLS light polution filter and it certainly helps to use a custom wb.

I'm not so sure about taking a Wb shot in the day time, a white balance shot is supposed to correct for the conditions you are shooting under at the time not 5 hours earlier. But hey, I'm no expert on the subject, and thats a fact.

Sandy
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-05-2010, 09:42 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
From what i understand if you are shooting in RAW, and i mean proper raw, white balances mean squat.

As troy pointed out you balance your black point, and your white point on the computer once everything has been shot. If it was a big point in anything programs such as maxim would make account for such a setting, but as they do not i do not think you need to worry about it.

The only thing i could say is to shoot the image in proper raw either cannon or something similar, then use a program to de bayer, stack and then process the image to obtain the correct white balance.

If you are obsessed enough to set it in the camera, then i would go for normal sunlight WB, this will reveal the colours as we would generally see it. but there are lots of variables that change this.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-05-2010, 10:12 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,261
Image in RAW then white balance on a G2V star...
http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTROP/CUSTOMWB.HTM

How to find em'...
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...3/Main/3192162
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement