Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-07-2018, 04:49 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Palomar 8

Here's another one of the Palomar globular clusters, Palomar 8. Nothing particularly exciting about it except I've always wondered why it never received a NGC designation because visually it's quite an easy object.

Cheers

Steve

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/P...16200_RC14.htm
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (pal8_STXL16200_RC14_LRGB_small2.jpg)
192.0 KB43 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-07-2018, 06:25 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,138
Nice catch Steve....couldn't find much written about It compared to some of the other Palomar's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-07-2018, 08:38 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Nice catch Steve....couldn't find much written about It compared to some of the other Palomar's.
Thanks Louie. Yes it isn't well documented on the web. I had trouble finding other mages of it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-07-2018, 08:40 PM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,097
Very loose for a glob. Nice work though.

I think globs are my favourite objects besides some of the great galaxies on here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-07-2018, 08:47 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
Very loose for a glob. Nice work though.

I think globs are my favourite objects besides some of the great galaxies on here.
Thanks Bart. Actually I've seen globulars looser than this one. I like them too but this isn't a particularly colorful example.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-07-2018, 12:46 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,314
Yep Steve that's an easy one to observe.
All the Palomar globular clusters were found on survey plates.
Seems like someone didn't check that some of the globs had already been discovered and had NGC/IC numbers.
Here's a complete list,which I guess you already have,but others might like anyway.
http://www.astronomy-mall.com/Advent...ce/palglob.htm
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-07-2018, 09:00 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,944
Great resolution on this tiny glob Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-07-2018, 10:14 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Great resolution on this tiny glob Steve.
Thanks Paul. The data is a bit thin. I had to throw out a lot of subs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Yep Steve that's an easy one to observe.
All the Palomar globular clusters were found on survey plates.
Seems like someone didn't check that some of the globs had already been discovered and had NGC/IC numbers.
Here's a complete list,which I guess you already have,but others might like anyway.
http://www.astronomy-mall.com/Advent...ce/palglob.htm
Cheers
Yes that website is probably the best reference. Palomar 8 is probably the second easiest after Palomar 9. Surprisingly it's hard to find many images of it on the web. It's also surprising it was missed in the NGC/IC. There was a Canadian observer (now dead I think) who claimed to have observed all of the Palomars with a C11. He must have had good eyes. Of course the Terzan globulars, once regarded as impossible, are even more of a challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-07-2018, 08:11 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Tiny and pretty. Is it at great distance, or on the other side of the galaxy?

The bright red and blue pair add interest.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-07-2018, 08:48 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Tiny and pretty. Is it at great distance, or on the other side of the galaxy?

The bright red and blue pair add interest.
It's a reasonable distance away Mike - about 42,000 light years. The yellowish colour of many of the stars probably indicates that there is some absorbing dust in the way.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-07-2018, 10:14 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,106
Looks like the system is working well Steve. Great stars for this image scale.
Not exactly an exciting little sucker, but well captured
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-07-2018, 08:35 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Looks like the system is working well Steve. Great stars for this image scale.
Not exactly an exciting little sucker, but well captured
Thanks Peter. Yes you are right about this one not being exciting. Probably explains why it's hardly ever imaged.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30-07-2018, 11:47 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nice catch, Steve!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30-07-2018, 01:30 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
It's cute and stands out well in the photo. Not quite an omega C but different is good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30-07-2018, 04:21 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Nice catch, Steve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
It's cute and stands out well in the photo. Not quite an omega C but different is good.
Thanks guys. As I've said in a previous comment I think it's bright enough to have a NGC designation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement