Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-02-2020, 03:47 PM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
M42 - my first astrophoto ever!!

Hi all,

Yes I know it's another M42 picture but I'm pretty proud of this one. This is my first ever image. This was taken from my bortle 6 front yard with no filters.

Details:
Telescope - SW Esprit 100
Primary camera - ZWO ASI294
Guide camera - ZWO ASI120mm mini
Mount - SW AZEQ6
Acquisition/guiding software - KStars/EKOS
Light - 19 x 300sec - total integration 1.6 hrs
Darks - 50
Bias - 50
Flats - 50
Stacking - DSS
Post-processing - Startools 1.5

Please feel free to comment. I can already see things to improve (blown out core, bloated stars, noise). I know I still have a lot to learn but I'm encouraged by what I managed to get.

Rene
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M42_20200201_FINAL.jpg)
113.6 KB242 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2020, 03:54 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,453
Hell of a good image for a first attempt, as you said a bit blown out but what the heck it can only get better from here, well done.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2020, 04:00 PM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Hell of a good image for a first attempt, as you said a bit blown out but what the heck it can only get better from here, well done.

Leon
Thanks Leon. Yeah there's only so much you can do in post.

Rene
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2020, 04:18 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Very nice Rene. With such a bright nebula you could experiment with different length exposures to see what works best for your gear. Sometimes shorter exposures work well on the bright stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2020, 04:27 PM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by casstony View Post
Very nice Rene. With such a bright nebula you could experiment with different length exposures to see what works best for your gear. Sometimes shorter exposures work well on the bright stuff.
Thanks. I was experimenting with the exposure length. Wanted to see how good my guiding was & how much detail i could pull in. Turns out, pretty good & quite a bit. Next time I'll do shorter exposures so the core doesn't blow out. I'll also use a filters which might help the star bloat.

Rene
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2020, 04:47 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by RugbyRene View Post
I'll also use a filters which might help the star bloat.
Rene
A uv/ir filter or broadband light pollution filter should make a big difference to the stars. An L-Enhance will make stars smaller again but result in different colours to the nebula.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2020, 05:51 PM
RyanJones
Registered User

RyanJones is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Posts: 1,439
Hi Rene,

Great first effort. I won’t critique as you obviously recognise your areas of improvement. Your stars are round and you’ve collected some nice clean data so well done. Shorter exposures or lower gain will help control the blown out areas. The key is to make sure you aren’t highlight clipping in your subs. Once combined, if you haven’t clipped the highlights then you can selectively tone down the bright areas. Once clipped, as you said, there’s only so much you can do in post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-02-2020, 06:02 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,057
Well done !!
Nice first effort
Enjoy Startools it takes time to find your feet with it but a very intuitive and powerful post processing tool for all levels of experience ,conditions and data quality

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-02-2020, 10:57 PM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
100% better than anything I can do
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2020, 01:00 AM
Outcast's Avatar
Outcast (Carlton)
Always gonna be a NOOB...

Outcast is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cairns, Qld
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by RugbyRene View Post
Acquisition/guiding software - KStars/EKOS
Great first shot mate, onwards & upwards from here...

I quoted the section above as I'm curious, are you perchance using an RPi with Stellarmate or similar loaded to pull your rig together & run from Kstars & Ekos?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-02-2020, 09:31 PM
Mike92 (Mike)
Registered User

Mike92 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Wooloowin
Posts: 4
Very nice!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2020, 09:09 AM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outcast View Post
Great first shot mate, onwards & upwards from here...

I quoted the section above as I'm curious, are you perchance using an RPi with Stellarmate or similar loaded to pull your rig together & run from Kstars & Ekos?

Cheers
Hi,

In fact I am using a RPI 3+ atm with the latest Stellarmate loaded. I run KStars from a Windows 10 laptop and have the Ekos service running on the RPI remotely (when I say remotely I mean from my front-yard.)

I'll be making the transition to RPI4 once some bugs are ironed out (such as the ASI120mm mini guide camera not working).

I love KStars/Ekos. It' such a powerful tool and is a complete planetarium/image acquisition software package. And it's free!!

Rene
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-02-2020, 09:12 AM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek View Post
Well done !!
Nice first effort
Enjoy Startools it takes time to find your feet with it but a very intuitive and powerful post processing tool for all levels of experience ,conditions and data quality

Cheers
Thanks.

Yes, StarTools is intuitive but like anything new will take a while to learn. I chose it as I wasn't comfortable paying upwards of $200 for Pixinsight or AstroPixelProcessor, or paying a subscription for Photoshop.

Rene
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-02-2020, 08:57 PM
LostInSp_ce's Avatar
LostInSp_ce
Unregistered User

LostInSp_ce is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 754
Great first M42 as you've noted your guiding is perfect as is the level of detail you've managed to pull out. Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-02-2020, 09:05 PM
ChrisV's Avatar
ChrisV (Chris)
Registered User

ChrisV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,738
Excellent first shot. M42 is difficult!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-02-2020, 10:53 PM
Outcast's Avatar
Outcast (Carlton)
Always gonna be a NOOB...

Outcast is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cairns, Qld
Posts: 1,285
Hey Rene,

I've sent you a PM about Stellarmate, etc.. rather than tie up your thread.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-02-2020, 11:46 PM
truss
Registered User

truss is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 53
Top effort Rene, I'm miles off from even coming close to your effort.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-02-2020, 06:41 PM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 344
Here's a reprocess of the same image using the original data. This time through Pixinsight. I think it is a better result.

What do you all think?

Rene
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (nM42_FinalPI_20200229.jpg)
180.2 KB115 views
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-02-2020, 06:58 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Looks good Rene, much more natural looking than the first post.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29-02-2020, 09:15 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Much better Rene, but regarding the blown out issue, shorter subs won't help,
as to quieten down the core so that the Trapezium becomes visible would
require subs so short[15-20secs] that most of the rest of the nebula would not register. You need to take a mix of subs of the above mentioned duration
and your usual ones, and use layers, masking etc to quieten down the core
without losing the rest of the nebulosity.
raymo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement