Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-11-2018, 11:07 AM
Jethro777 (Jethro)
Registered User

Jethro777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 131
Sony A77 + 100mm 2/8 lens only, 47 frames, 2.4 min exposure

I just started,

This is the best I can do with what I have until I finish manufacturing my star tracker.

I can't afford a telescope, so I am trying to get the best out of the equipment i have.

At the moment, I can only get 2 second exposures without oval stars/drift. I'm suprised at what I could pick up so far!

Used DSS, and Photoshop to clean final image.

Images : Orion + Cluster

Would welcome suggestions!
What other targets could I 'see' / go for?

This is one of the RAW files --> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ct...mvDFGA_z41n0yC (Orion RAW)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (8by10-partial-rion-inc-cluster.jpg)
197.7 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (Small-Series-6-Post-DS-PS.jpg)
43.7 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (Cluster.jpg)
103.6 KB30 views

Last edited by Jethro777; 10-11-2018 at 12:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2018, 01:34 PM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,444
First of all Jethro, that's a great start with what you have. Focus looks good and stars are nice and tight. You can probably push your exposure out to 3 to 5 seconds and still maintain fairly round stars without tracking. Using the 500 rule, you can calculate an appropriate time by dividing your lens focal length into 500. In your case, that's 5 seconds but that is just a guide and probably the maximum exposure you could try. More subs will also help. If you shot 47 x 2 second exposures, that's just over one and a half minutes - not very long, not long enough for some of the other nebulosity you're missing with short exposures.

Watch your shadow density in your processing too, as there will be more to reveal in what you have if you don't try and make the background too black. It's all a learning curve. What ISO were you using? You could probably get a really nice result by shooting say, 100 subs at 3200iso at f 2.8 and 4 seconds. Also, where you are shooting from makes a huge difference. Get yourself out to a nice dark sky so you're not capturing any artificial light in the sky.

Keep experimenting, you're doing well and results will get better as you learn. It's a great hobby and as you've found out, you don't necessarily need a telescope!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-11-2018, 08:53 AM
Jethro777 (Jethro)
Registered User

Jethro777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 131
Thanks Michael!
That was so encouraging. I've learned a bit more now, I am posting a new shot of LMC as a result!
Because of the ASPC sensor, I think I don't quite have 5 seconds. I have noticed that taking pictures of objects closer to the pole (like LMC), I can increase my exposure time with minimal star trailing.
I am currently in the process of making a star tracker.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-11-2018, 08:57 AM
Jethro777 (Jethro)
Registered User

Jethro777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 131
Lmc

1600 ISO
49 x 5 second exposure (4 minute exposure)
f/2.8
Using Bias, Dark and Flat Frames in DSS
Using Sony A77, Minolta 100mm f/2.8 lens

Post processed in CS6
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (LMC-SMall.jpg)
189.6 KB18 views
Click for full-size image (LMC-Detail.jpg)
201.4 KB17 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement