Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-01-2020, 09:21 PM
Xeteth (David)
Registered User

Xeteth is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 129
New APS-H camera - M42 vs M48 tube size

I've should receive my new camera tomorrow which is a QHY16200a APS-H, with 2" LRGBHSO filters and I'm wondering about tube size and vignetting. I've tried searching for answers but have come up short so I'm wondering if someone could share some advice.

The attached picture has my current setup with my existing QHY8-Pro - the field flattener is M48 on the telescope side and M42 on the camera side. I've been having issues with both image tilt and severe vignetting which I want to eliminate. To address the tilt I've ordered an adapter for the focuser which will mean I can thread my camera on instead of clamping. But for the vignetting, I'm wondering if the M42 tube is too small for the sensor?

The QHY16200a is an even bigger chip than the QHY8-Pro and hence I'm wondering if I should be investing in a field flattener that is M48 both ends? Would an M42 thread be big enough to illuminate an APS-H sized chip?

If so, can anyone recommend a field flattener that would be appropriate? Any suggestions would be much appreciated, cheers!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_20200130_220058.jpg)
194.7 KB23 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-2020, 03:45 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeteth View Post
I've should receive my new camera tomorrow which is a QHY16200a APS-H, with 2" LRGBHSO filters and I'm wondering about tube size and vignetting. I've tried searching for answers but have come up short so I'm wondering if someone could share some advice.

The attached picture has my current setup with my existing QHY8-Pro - the field flattener is M48 on the telescope side and M42 on the camera side. I've been having issues with both image tilt and severe vignetting which I want to eliminate. To address the tilt I've ordered an adapter for the focuser which will mean I can thread my camera on instead of clamping. But for the vignetting, I'm wondering if the M42 tube is too small for the sensor?

The QHY16200a is an even bigger chip than the QHY8-Pro and hence I'm wondering if I should be investing in a field flattener that is M48 both ends? Would an M42 thread be big enough to illuminate an APS-H sized chip?

If so, can anyone recommend a field flattener that would be appropriate? Any suggestions would be much appreciated, cheers!
KAF16200 sensor has a 34.6mm diagonal. The QHY8-Pro has a 28mm diagonal. So the KAF16200 is a fair bit larger.

Generally speaking the larger the aperture of the tube and adapters the better. Vignetting is the consequence.

Vignetting though often is corrected easily with flats so I would not get too concerned there. Round stars to the corners is what you need to concentrate on. That comes from a flattener with a corrected circle in this case at least 34.6mm in diameter.

A full frame sensor has a 44mm diagonal. 2 inch filters are plenty to cover the APSh as they will also cover a full frame easily (2 inches is 50.8mm).

Threaded adapters can still have tilt as the tilt may be in the focuser, slightly off adapter threads, not correctly seated dovetail adapters etc.

You may need to pack out the camera if the tilt persists once you use the threaded adapters. Its easy enough. I can give you a write up of how to do that and I have posted a writeup recently about it.

You should be fine.

The 16200 sensor is one of the nicest CCD sensors only bettered by the 16803.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-2020, 05:10 PM
Xeteth (David)
Registered User

Xeteth is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 129
Cheers for the info Greg!

I have a flat panel box which I've currently been using for flats, but I've had some really weird results with them (usually over-correcting). I've tried various ADU's for them to no avail - I was wondering whether the issue was related to tilt and/or incorrect gain/offset. I'll see how I go with the 16200, I'm hoping the issue resolves itself (although my curious brain will still make me figure out what was going wrong with the QHY8-Pro ).

The focuser on the OTA seems to be decent enough, but certainly not amazing - something that is on the long list of upgrades. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "pack out the camera", but would love to learn about it (and see if it fixes my issue if needs be) - if you could share that write-up that'd be great! Cheers again!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-01-2020, 11:22 PM
Xeteth (David)
Registered User

Xeteth is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 129
Well the camera arrived, it's absolutely gorgeous!

However, as I suspected the thread it accepts is M48 so I will need a new field flattener that is M48-M48. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2020, 04:37 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeteth View Post
Cheers for the info Greg!

I have a flat panel box which I've currently been using for flats, but I've had some really weird results with them (usually over-correcting). I've tried various ADU's for them to no avail - I was wondering whether the issue was related to tilt and/or incorrect gain/offset. I'll see how I go with the 16200, I'm hoping the issue resolves itself (although my curious brain will still make me figure out what was going wrong with the QHY8-Pro ).

The focuser on the OTA seems to be decent enough, but certainly not amazing - something that is on the long list of upgrades. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "pack out the camera", but would love to learn about it (and see if it fixes my issue if needs be) - if you could share that write-up that'd be great! Cheers again!
Flats.

I read one writeup of flats that worked out to be 30,000 ADU for the flats. I find that too much and you overcorrect. Also with my cameras which have shutters I need to take a flat that is at least 3 seconds long otherwise I see the shutter opening in the image.

I generally go for dusk flat with a white Tshirt over the end of the scope. I do Ha first whilst the light is still a bit bright.
I go for around 20,000 ADU. I usually only take 3-6 flats.
I take about 16 bias shots and usually reuse them for some time as bias does not seem to change over time that I have noticed. Same with darks. I try to get about 16 darks but often its only 6.

I make a master flat in CCDstack and do not bias subtract when they are made.

I use CCDstack to calibrate and I use the corresponding dark and bias, flat and bias. I use the adaptive subtraction option for darks which asks for a bias and then does a calculation based on your image and scales the dark.

For tilt. Pack out the camera refers to getting a very thin spacer between the camera and say the filter wheel or some other part of the imaging train before the camera.
I take an image about 10 seconds long and put a torch with a rag over it pointing at one corner of the scope. I then see where that light spot is in the displayed image. This orients me to which corners of the physical camera match the displayed image. I orient from standing behind the camera looking at it. In my scope set up left and right and up and down are both reversed. Don't miss this step or its easy to get confused later.

Now take an image of the stars at 2x2 binning and inspect the corners. Are all 4 corners showing sharp stars or are one or two corners showing bloated stars. Lets say the displayed image shows top right corner bloated stars but the other corners look tightly focused. Now you know from step 1 that top right of the image is bottom left of the physical camera looking at it from behind the camera. Loosen the connection and slide in a thin packer. I use spark plug gap spacers you get from auto shops or I got some thin brass sheet from a metal shop. Its usually very thin spacers like .08mm.
I am assuming here you have solid threaded adapters and solid spacers and have checked they are all snug or tightened up first.
Slip in the packer and retighten. Take another shot, inspect the corners - better or worse? Keep it up until all 4 corners are good.
Sometimes a side needs to be packed out, sometimes just one corner. It can't really be 3 corners only 1 or a side.

If you find you are packing it out too much then you are probably doing the wrong corner. Stop and start again. Unless you setup is poorly done then it should be a thin packer not a large one.

Once you get used to it you can do it in about half an hour. I think the fastest I have taken is 10 minutes. The slowest is 3 days! Its a bit like drift polar alignment. Make sure you do the orientation step or you can expect a 3 day job!

I hope this helps.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement