Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 14-10-2017, 02:54 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,490
In reflection on my movie experience with this film I would be remiss if I did not remark on the audience in attendance.

I was struck by the gender and age of those watching in the theater. 90% male and nearly all in the 40-60 age range. I have not seen so many beer bellies and goatees in one place (beyond exotic dance halls or astronomy forums) in a long long time.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 14-10-2017, 03:41 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by wavelandscott View Post
In reflection on my movie experience with this film I would be remiss if I did not remark on the audience in attendance.

I was struck by the gender and age of those watching in the theater. 90% male and nearly all in the 40-60 age range. I have not seen so many beer bellies and goatees in one place (beyond exotic dance halls or astronomy forums) in a long long time.
... all with a perfect right eye.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 22-10-2017, 04:25 PM
LostInSp_ce's Avatar
LostInSp_ce
Unregistered User

LostInSp_ce is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 754
Just got around to seeing this and must say it's definitely one to see on the big screen. If you can IMAX it. No spoilers here but the visuals are second to none and the sound oh the sound is MAGNIFICENT!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 31-10-2017, 11:06 AM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,342
I went to see it with Andy01 last night.

What a way to draw on and expand the story line of the original! great visuals as people have posted above, and while Vangelis was missing I reckon the score evoked Vangelis enough to tie the two movies together nicely. I liked the way they also kept the "Tech" in the movie quite faithful to the original as well, you could easily imagine technology and hardware evolving from what was pictured in the original to what was pictured in the new one. Contrast that to something like Star Wars EP1 where people had to try to explain way the "Devolution" of imaginary starship design from the sleek chrome beauties of EP1 to the very 1970's origami and scaffolding of the original movies.

And a nicely non NON Hollywood ending, throwing up questions rather than answers, just like the first time around.

I agree with Gary's post at the start of this thread, if you don't like the original, you probably won't like this one either. I am not sure if my wife will take to it but I am dead sure I will watch it again on a big screen, I know I looked down for a moment as some food arrived (Gold class, yay) and realised I had missed something and thought to myself "I am going to regret that in half an hour or so"

Last edited by The_bluester; 03-11-2017 at 09:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:02 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,256
For me it was well worth the wait!
Faithfully recreates Ridley’s original vision & builds on the original story & design. Visually incredible, sound was awesome (even without Vangelis) and the pace was majestic.
A rare sequel that matches the original!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-11-2017, 09:39 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Late to this thread, even though I saw the film a day after opening night.

Firstly - the original Bladerunner is a work of art. One of the great films of the 20th century. I don't really care much for critics, most of them are so far up themselves with self importance it's sickening.

Anyway, onto Bladerunner 2049 - the acting was very good, although I would have liked to have seen more of Deckard. Perhaps a bit too slow, but captivating nevertheless. Music was good, but not as good as the original imho. Visuals were good, but not as good as the original either imho, but not far from.

And I must mention Ana de Armas - she is absolutely GORGEOUS!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-11-2017, 11:24 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Got to see the film today, really enjoyed it , even my wife who was reluctant to go liked it {sections of the audience even applauded as the film finished } . Agree entirely with Garys original post dont miss seeing it on the big screen
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-11-2017, 04:46 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Seeing tomorrow night. Really looking forward to it!

H
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-11-2017, 05:39 PM
pfitzgerald's Avatar
pfitzgerald (Paul)
Registered User

pfitzgerald is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 623
I went and saw it on Friday night - what a great film - visually very well done, soundtrack also - even if it wasn't done by Vangelis - Zimmer did a great job. Plot and and character development were also very good. I made a point of re-watching the 'Final Cut' of the original which was well worth doing. BR2049 certainly came alive on the big screen.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-11-2017, 09:01 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Seeing tomorrow night. Really looking forward to it!

H
Let us know what you think!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 08-11-2017, 01:41 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
My friend who I was meant to go with pulled out. It's been postponed until next week.

H
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-11-2017, 03:24 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
My friend who I was meant to go with pulled out. It's been postponed until next week.

H
Damn H!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 22-11-2017, 12:00 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Finally got to see this last night.

My goodness, what an incredible work of art! I was captivated the entire duration of the film. The cinematography and music were superb. A great continuation of the story!

H
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 22-11-2017, 12:37 PM
pfitzgerald's Avatar
pfitzgerald (Paul)
Registered User

pfitzgerald is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 623
Totally agree with you 'H' - Vangelis's original soundtrack is by far and away my favourite soundtrack, but Zimmer did a superb job of adding to audio landscape. The cinematography was breathtaking.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 27-11-2017, 05:25 AM
DeepSkyBagger's Avatar
DeepSkyBagger (Patrick)
Astro Pom

DeepSkyBagger is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 41
Saw it myself a few weeks ago. I found it a very worthy successor to the original - I have no doubt it will come to be considered as much a classic as its predecessor.

Loved it.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 30-01-2018, 08:42 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
Reviving this.

Just watched it last night, and I have to say it is a stunning masterpiece. So faithful to the original, and the background tones and music set the mood just as sharply - if not more so - than the original. I sat there completely immersed and riveted.

Nothing to dislike IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 30-01-2018, 09:00 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Finally got to see this last night.

My goodness, what an incredible work of art! I was captivated the entire duration of the film. The cinematography and music were superb. A great continuation of the story!

H
I've already bought it on Blu ray and watched it once more. Needs more showings, but I totally agree with you H. Thoroughly enjoyable movie!

Quote:
Originally Posted by LewisM View Post
Reviving this.

Just watched it last night, and I have to say it is a stunning masterpiece. So faithful to the original, and the background tones and music set the mood just as sharply - if not more so - than the original. I sat there completely immersed and riveted.

Nothing to dislike IMHO.
Agreed!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 30-01-2018, 11:37 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
My wife hated the first one. I'll subject her to this, too.

She also said that Mad Max Fury Road was 3 hours of her life she's never getting back. Hahaha!

H
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 31-01-2018, 12:05 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
My wife hated the first one. I'll subject her to this, too.

She also said that Mad Max Fury Road was 3 hours of her life she's never getting back. Hahaha!

H
haven't seen mad max fury road, but didn't like the trailer, so prolly won't like it.

But, the original Blade Runner is a classic movie. How can your wife hate it!

have you seen "predestination"? One of the very best movies I've seen in many a year. I like a movie that makes me think (even if it hurts in my extreme old age lol!).
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-03-2018, 06:16 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Blade Runner received the Best Cinematography and Visual Effects Oscars, well deserved Roger Deakins for cinematography. Thought Sylvia Hoeks should have been nominated supporting actress for her role as 'Luv"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement