Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-07-2020, 03:26 PM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,767
Environmental costs of ALAN

Hi,

As astronomers we are concerned about light pollution and are probably aware that it is the fastest growing form of pollution. It isn't just astronomers that are concerned. You see, it isn't only astronomers noctural activity that is being affected. Ecologists are becoming increasingly concerned about the adverse effects of Artificial Light at Night (ALAN). I've just noticed an opinion piece on this topic by Alison Haynes, Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, University of Wollongong in the journal Conservation Physiology.

Dark matters: night light stops toads in their tracks
Alison Haynes, Conservation Physiology, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2020, coz085, https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz085

For the study she cites see:

Artificial light at night disturbs the activity and energy allocation of the common toad during the breeding period
Morgane Touzot, Loïc Teulier, Thierry Lengagne, Jean Secondi, Marc Théry, Paul-Antoine Libourel, Ludovic Guillard, Nathalie Mondy,
Conservation Physiology, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2020, coz002, https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz002

Full text:

Humans like night lights because, although we do not see so well in the dark, we do like to stay up past sunset. But how do night lights affect other species, particularly nocturnal species? As a new study shows, if you are a common toad, even the glow from Artificial light at night disturbs the activity and energy allocation of the common toad during the breeding period a street light could mean you are not as active as you should be at night. To make matters worse, night lights may also make toads stressed, which can have dire consequences for survival. And, as it happens, this kind of response may be universal among vertebrates, from fishes to gorillas.

With nearly 25% of the Earth’s surface now lit up at night, a figure that is rising by 6% every year, it is becoming more and more important to understand the effects of artificial light at night (ALAN), as Morgane Touzot from the University of Lyon and her colleagues from France would agree. She and her team investigated the effects of ALAN on the common toad (Bufo bufo). This toad is widely distributed in forests and bushlands across Europe and parts of Northern Asia and North Africa. Why toads? Well, amphibians are good to study in general, as there are a lot of nocturnal species; moreover, amphibians are among the most threatened groups of animals on Earth. Understanding stressors that pose a risk to their survival is imperative.

Touzot and her team caught 36 male wild toads at the beginning of the breeding season and subjected them to a variety of light levels for 20 days while monitoring their behaviour and oxygen uptake. One light level mimicked moonlight (0.1 lux) and acted as a control. Another light level was representative of a typical street light (5 lux), while a third, at 20 lux, mimicked urban park lights.

The team found that, for toads exposed to artificial light, their activity was down by as much as 73%. In addition, artificial light triggered a reallocation of energy. Toads exposed to artificial light were likely spending more energy on maintenance costs and, as a result, had to reduce activity. Perhaps this added maintenance cost was to cope with stress.

Touzot’s results are concerning. With current, rapid urbanization, a lot of naturally dark habitats are being lost. And, it is not just streets and cities that are lit up at night. Restored areas, many of which contain wetlands that are important habitat for a lot of species, are experiencing artificial light, making ALAN an emerging stressor that puts many species at risk.

Although many solutions have been proposed, few have been thoroughly tested. For instance, we could maintain dark areas, change spectra and minimize the blue wavelength that is particularly disruptive to circadian rhythms. We could also dim lights or switch lights on for only part of the night. Conservation physiology has told us about the dark side of night light. It is encouraging that we can glimpse potential solutions, but now it is time to start evaluating just how those solutions might impact our ecosystems so we can help our wildlife reclaim the night.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement