Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-09-2017, 09:37 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Question Can anyone Identify these weird Star shapes?

hello everyone, i need some advice,
i will first state my issue,
then equipment
then what i think

I had my first imaging night a few days ago with my new ASI1600mm and filter wheel plus OAG and i was impressed with the camera! how ever i am getting some odd star shapes that do not look like guiding issues too me. it is the same scope i have always used and didnt see this happen when imaging with my DSLR. I was wondering if some more experienced images could take a look and point me towards what could possibly be the problem and how to fix it.
i am using a belt driven and tuned HEQ6 mount, ED100 skywatcher refactor with 0.85 reducer. guiding with the qhy11 5L mono on an orion off axis guider. i have the 8 position filter wheel and the ASI1600mm.

here are some pictures of my stars. it appears to me that in the 2-10 second subs the stars appear to be smeared, and in the longer subs and brighter stars it looks like the stars have a dint in them. if you have seen anything like this i would love to know what could cause this and how to fix it because its really annoying me haha
Regards, alex
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2second.JPG)
46.0 KB74 views
Click for full-size image (10sec.JPG)
56.8 KB55 views
Click for full-size image (Capture.JPG)
93.9 KB56 views
Click for full-size image (m42 stars.JPG)
61.7 KB60 views
Click for full-size image (m42starsss.JPG)
64.8 KB66 views
Click for full-size image (ooo..JPG)
69.3 KB63 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-09-2017, 10:26 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Hi Alex,
are you using PHD2 guiding?
can you post a guide graph?

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-09-2017, 10:29 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
yes i am, i dont have the log or a picture but my guiding was consistent at 0.8-1 arsseconds , no large jumps or dips, i did have a bit of cable drag but i expect that to show up differently?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-09-2017, 10:43 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrads View Post
yes i am, i dont have the log or a picture but my guiding was consistent at 0.8-1 arsseconds , no large jumps or dips, i did have a bit of cable drag but i expect that to show up differently?
It could be so many things -
it looks like your OAG is loose or the guide star was too dim -
some of the pics look like your camera is too heavy for the focuser
& it's causing mis-collimation & distortion.

My PHD2 guide graph is normally reading below 0.25 pixels rms.
What was yours saying?

It can take a while to iron out bugs with any system.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-09-2017, 11:00 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Hey Allen,
the focuser thing crossed my mind as well since its a pretty bad one, if i want to see if it is that would can i do to test that?
mine is always below 0.25 as well
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-09-2017, 11:14 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrads View Post
Hey Allen,
the focuser thing crossed my mind as well since its a pretty bad one, if i want to see if it is that would can i do to test that?
mine is always below 0.25 as well

I have no experience with refractors.
I use Newts.
Maybe someone here could help you who has specific knowledge of your model -
ED100 skywatcher refactor with 0.85 reducer.

Maybe your thread should be here:
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/f...splay.php?f=35
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-09-2017, 07:43 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Looks like extended sensitivity of the camera for IR... I have similar problem with my Canon 400mm f/2.8 and modified DSLR, before I used UVIR block filter.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-09-2017, 08:40 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,901
UV/IR bloat is one possibility, what filters are you using?
More likely some tilt causing elongations. As to those dents in the sides of the stars that's a bit harder to fathom.

Best to eliminate one possibility at a time. Check for tilt by rotating the camera and see if it changes the way the stars look.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-09-2017, 02:35 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Looks like extended sensitivity of the camera for IR... I have similar problem with my Canon 400mm f/2.8 and modified DSLR, before I used UVIR block filter.
is that an issue for CCDs?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-09-2017, 02:38 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
UV/IR bloat is one possibility, what filters are you using?
More likely some tilt causing elongations. As to those dents in the sides of the stars that's a bit harder to fathom.

Best to eliminate one possibility at a time. Check for tilt by rotating the camera and see if it changes the way the stars look.

Greg.
i agree might be tilt the focuser was extended far, is there a way to fix the tilt?
with the bloating, this was a lum sub at a dark sky site, they are the stock standard ones that come from the asi supplier
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-09-2017, 02:48 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrads View Post
is that an issue for CCDs?
Yes it could be the issue for refractor, CCD is much more sensitive to IR than standard (and modified) DSLR, and refractors in general are not corrected well enough for wide spectrum.. when doing narrow band, you need to refocus for each filter.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-09-2017, 02:52 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Yes it could be the issue for refractor, CCD is much more sensitive to IR than standard (and modified) DSLR, and refractors in general are not corrected well enough for wide spectrum.. when doing narrow band, you need to refocus for each filter.
ah i didnt realize, thank you ill do that next time
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-09-2017, 11:14 PM
obrads (Alex obradovic)
Registered User

obrads is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: melbourne
Posts: 26
Update!

i have 100% figured out the the star shapes are due to tilt in the focuser tube since it is extended lots, i am trying to figure out how to deal with this and am considering buying a 2" M- F tube to attach to the focuser tube before my reducer and imaging set up, my thought process is that with will mean the tube doesn't have to be extended as far and will reduce tilt? will this work? if anyone knows. thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
#asi1600mm, #guiding, #help, #refractor, #stars


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement