ICEINSPACE
Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waxing Crescent
22%
The Sun Now
Time Zones
Sydney*
1:54 am
Perth
10:54 pm
Auckland*
3:54 am
New York
9:54 am
Paris
3:54 pm
GMT
2:54 pm




Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-11-2017, 02:12 PM
Steve14 (Steven)
Registered User

Steve14 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: olinda
Posts: 7
Good telescope for planetary imaging?

Can anyone recommend a good OTA that would suit a NEQ6 pro mount that i could use for planetary imaging? I'm going to use my modified canon dslr, a televue powermate and backyard EOS to capture. My budget would be around $1500 if i can sell my beloved 12inch dob...(i was contemplating to somehow use the dob on the mount but i think it would be too heavy)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2017, 03:22 PM
Wavytone
Fringe Lunatic

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 2,516
You want focal length, lots of it.

Secondhand you should be able to find a Skywatcher 180mm f/15 Mak, Celestron C9.25 or Meade 10" ACF in your budget.

Looks like you just missed a 10” http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=162439

Last edited by Wavytone; 04-11-2017 at 08:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2017, 03:45 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,678
I had great fun doing planetary using a 12 inch dob on an NEQ6 - it is just doable if you have strong tube rings and a Losmandy style mounting.

won't work in wind though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2017, 08:16 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,922
Consider motorising or getting an equatorial platform for your Dob. Alternatively, a C11 rides well enough on a NEQ6.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2017, 03:19 PM
Steve14 (Steven)
Registered User

Steve14 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: olinda
Posts: 7
powermate?

Hmm. As i have a 102mm f5.1 refractor, i'm wondering if something like a 5x televue powermate may give me the focal length i need? Am i being too naive? Any thoughts ?
Thanks for the replies..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2017, 03:23 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 8,368
Mike years ago did planetary imaging using a 12 inch on an eq 6 and will excellent results.

Personally I would not get rid of the 12 inch.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2017, 05:18 PM
brian nordstrom's Avatar
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 3,962

C9,25 or C11 both will sit happily on an EQ6 .

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2017, 05:57 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 4,119
I have an Edge HD8 for sale in the Classified's right now, it's a pretty good planetary scope native f10 focal length is 2032mm, and that goes out to f20 @ 4064mm with a 2x Barlow. It is light enough for an NEQ6.

I would be buying a planetary camera capable of high frame rate video, that way you do not have to worry about guiding (and long focal length guiding is a real art which requires good gear). The ASI224MC is a reasonablly priced planetary camera.

https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com...-3-0/asi224mc/

Last edited by glend; 11-11-2017 at 06:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-11-2017, 06:44 PM
Wavytone
Fringe Lunatic

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 2,516
Even better was a 12” tri-schiefspiegler that Barry Adcock built (ASV) long ago. From memory probably f/23. I can recall photos taken of the planets - on FILM - through that which were superb even compared to modern efforts.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-11-2017, 07:40 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
PI cult member

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve14 View Post
Hmm. As i have a 102mm f5.1 refractor, i'm wondering if something like a 5x televue powermate may give me the focal length i need? Am i being too naive? Any thoughts ?
Thanks for the replies..
Small aperture will significantly limit resolution for planetarny imaging. So while a 4" scope is quite capable for long exposure astrophotography, it is not the best choice for planetary imaging if one is after sharp and detailed planetary images.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-11-2017, 07:53 AM
Steve14 (Steven)
Registered User

Steve14 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: olinda
Posts: 7
Thanks for all your help. While my dob is great, it's collapsible so the truss slides into tubes on the outside of the ota - so tube rings wont go around it to secure it to the mount.
I think the best way foward is to sell my dob and modded dslr. I'm leaning toward a c9.25....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-11-2017, 10:10 PM
nicosk's Avatar
nicosk (Nicos)
Registered User

nicosk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 7
A C9.25" will ride comfortably on your proposed mount, and even on a Celestron AVX, both for visual and for imaging.

Using a high frame dedicated planetary camera is the best way forward to do planetary imaging (along with a good quality 1.25" Barlow to achieve the necessary long focal length).

A key benefit of the C9.25" is that it is the only one in the range with a primary having a focal ratio of f2.5 - the rest being f2. This results in the C9.25" having the reputation of consistently better optics than the rest of the bunch as figuring a f2.5 mirror is easier than a f2 mirror.

I was at a friend's house last night observing from his C9.25" actually - on the AVX and we went through about 40 objects in just under two hours. The mount performed flawlessly.

As for planetary, he has used his C9.25 lately for Neptune and Jupiter - again, no issues with the mount.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-11-2017, 10:16 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,922
The C9.25 being anything special is anecdotal. Celestron's shift in manufacturing from the USA to China is much more significant. Since that happened, there are a lot of reports of their SCTs in all sizes with good optics. Damian Peach once used a C9.25 but now uses a C14.

Regardless of what scope you use, what's most important is good collimation, good focus and good seeing
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15-11-2017, 04:21 PM
nicosk's Avatar
nicosk (Nicos)
Registered User

nicosk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
The C9.25 being anything special is anecdotal. Celestron's shift in manufacturing from the USA to China is much more significant. Since that happened, there are a lot of reports of their SCTs in all sizes with good optics. Damian Peach once used a C9.25 but now uses a C14.

Regardless of what scope you use, what's most important is good collimation, good focus and good seeing
Damian Peach has the luxury of a permanent setup (lucky him!).

The C9.25 despite having a larger central obstruction, has been noted many times as having good optics relative to the other scopes in the range. And while many reasons have been flouted for this, the usual one is the "gentler" focal ratio of the primary mirror.

As to it's status as special - no, it's not. It will not do wonders Vs the others in the range, but it is relatively much more portable than a C11. Of course, usual rules about aperture mattering do apply, subject to proper cooling along with the other parameters you mention
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15-11-2017, 06:47 PM
Steve14 (Steven)
Registered User

Steve14 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: olinda
Posts: 7
Apologies for my ignorance here but as a dob user, I collimate with a laser collimater. Do you collimate jn the same way with a SCT such as the C9.25?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15-11-2017, 07:10 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,922
Damian Peach regularly travels to Barbados(I think) for superior elevation and for better seeing than the south of England. With a C14.

But don’t be fooled into thinking the C11 is a much larger scope...the C9.25 with its slower primary is almost as long, just a little narrower.

Collocation of a SCT is effected only through adjustment of the secondary. If you’re used to a Dob, a SCT will be a piece of cake.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-11-2017, 08:02 PM
nicosk's Avatar
nicosk (Nicos)
Registered User

nicosk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 7
Actually the C14 is situated at his home. He used to take it with him but now he has another C14 at Barbados.

C9.25 Vs C11: I have seen both in the flesh plenty of times. I find the C11, well, huge Vs the C9.25 but I admit that's my perception of the scope.

Re collimating SCTs: Yep, secondary only once the scope has cooled completely and at high power, conditions permitting.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 16-11-2017, 10:55 AM
Troy's Avatar
Troy
Mars 2010

Troy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 767
Steven you collimate with a star, it's free and the best way to go. I use Metaguide to assist with the process and once you have learnt the software it's really easy and best of all Metaguide is free.

Another option is to stack the focused star images or video and then sharpen a little bit to judge which way you have to move the secondary mirror. This method probably doesn't suit beginners in my opinion.

Best of luck

p.s
Planetary imaging can be really frustrating at first, but stick with it and eventually the results will come once you overcome the steep learning curve
͡° ͜ʖ ͡°

Troy
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (MG_UserName_UserScope_111118_3.png)
11.3 KB30 views
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-11-2017, 05:11 PM
Regulus's Avatar
Regulus (Trevor)
Regulus - Couer de Leon

Regulus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devonport, Tasmania
Posts: 2,198
Yes. The 6" Mak by skywatcher.
It's surprisingly good for the price, and is often available around $400 S/H.
With an f12 and 1800mm, it gives good contrast, colour, and magnification.

Trev
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-11-2017, 06:06 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Spectroscopy Wizard

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St Leonards, Vic
Posts: 5,453
Coming in late....
I’ve used all the Meade Lx200,8”,10”,12” and then moved to Celestron....
I had the C925 for a few years, then stupidly sold it!! Big mistake. It was one of the best SCT I ever used.
Replaced it and was VERY happy, until my wife bought me a C11...
I couldn’t sell HER telescope so the C925 went......
The C11 meets all my needs for spectroscopy........but I still miss the C925.
No matter what is said, it definitely punches above it’s weight.
If I needed another SCT it would definitely be a C925.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Meade Instruments
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Tasco Australia
Advertisement
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Atik 16200
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Star Discovery
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement