Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-10-2014, 07:36 PM
SuperG
Registered User

SuperG is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 120
6" Refractor Vs 10" Dob

I have a very limited budget (~$700AU). I'm often told this a personal choice. I currently have Celestron EQ130 (130mm x 650 mm) and a Skywatcher 90 mm (F10) refractor. But both don't have enough light gathering ability to see things from Sydney.

I like to do visual and a bit of imaging of bright objects but my current two are poor performers on what I want to do next: targets like Jupiter, Saturn, Orion and Ring Nebula (imaging and visual).

I have two potential new scopes in my budget; a GSO 10" 250mm x 1250mm Dobsonian ($650 @ Andrews) and a 6" 150 mm x 1200 Skywatcher Refractor ($680 @ Sirius Optics/ ad in issue 81 of Aust Sky & Telescope).

Opinions please.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-10-2014, 08:15 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,426
for imaging nebula id stick with the 130x650

for visual if it were me i prefer a 6" refractor over the 10" dob -this creates a problem as you still need a solid mount to support it--i like the views a refractor gives over a newt under light pollution, it cools faster & planetary views will be better till the newt cools really well/collimated properly
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-10-2014, 09:32 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
The scope is a matter of personal choice [ I'd go the 10" for visual ], but
I think I'm right in saying that the GSO Newts will not allow prime focus imaging. Perhaps an owner can confirm this. Skywatcher Newts do
allow prime focus imaging, if you decide on the 10" scope.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-10-2014, 09:52 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
At the local astronomy club we compared a SW 6" F8 refractor and a 12" GSO Newt. The Newt was better, as it should be. For visual, aperture wins, unless you have severe jetstream. In which case the refractor would likely be better.

For photography I'd choose neither. The refractor (unless ED or APO) will have chromatic aberration and the reflector may need to be modified. Remember also that you need a good tracking mount for deep sky and those start at $1200 and go up from there.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-10-2014, 10:16 PM
SuperG
Registered User

SuperG is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 120
Thanks for the replies so far. For photography I was thinking to let things drift through the FOV and stitch multiple videos together. But I think if I need to mod the dob to get a cam on it that could be a problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement