Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 10-10-2018, 03:55 PM
AstralTraveller's Avatar
AstralTraveller (David)
Registered User

AstralTraveller is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 3,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
Oops, sorry, I should clarify:
I meant the revolution involving pitchforks, torches, and hollering, etc...


The flippant answer is 'when we sort out what to wear'. That is a reference to the Margaret Roadknight song 'What Should I Wear to the Revolution?' However, when looking (unsuccessfully) for the lyrics I found that, for some people at least, it was a real question.


https://www.mashallahnews.com/what-to-wear-on-a-revolution/


BTW "pitchforks, torches, and hollering" sounds more like a lynching than a revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-10-2018, 04:25 PM
csb's Avatar
csb (Craig)
Registered User

csb is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia
Posts: 909
Motobot video - thanks for the link. Good info for this discussion.

The government is smart and knows that if a new law will likely cause strong protest then bit by bit build legislation that will eventually have the desired outcome - as AndrewJ has commented above.

As for bikies, a ban on human control may outrage them and inspire them to go back to their roots; ie causing mayhem on the roads and in country towns as in the 60's & 70's.

Last edited by csb; 10-10-2018 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-10-2018, 05:36 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Craig


Quote:
The government is smart
I wouldnt go that far :-)
What i see happening is too many major players have now invested too much money into it, for it to be allowed to fail due to a bit of kickback from the public. ( At least until they have recouped their costs )

The govts will be told what to do and politely asked to go and do it.


Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-10-2018, 11:23 PM
csb's Avatar
csb (Craig)
Registered User

csb is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia
Posts: 909
I can't see that driverless vehicles will not become the norm.

If these vehicles can reliably drive to the destination and safely avoid other vehicles and obstacles then road crashes, injuries & deaths will decrease. I think this will drive legislation and acceptance by citizens.

Another positive is police will not have to spend much time with traffic violations.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-10-2018, 07:49 AM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by csb View Post
Another positive is police will not have to spend much time with traffic violations.
So how will they raise the money that pays the overtime bill etc? Come on Craig, get a grip lad
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-10-2018, 11:11 AM
csb's Avatar
csb (Craig)
Registered User

csb is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia
Posts: 909
I really like the idea of driverless cars - there are many positive benefits.

Completely driverless traffic would seem to be the logical conclusion.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-10-2018, 11:33 AM
AndyG's Avatar
AndyG (Andy)
No. I am a meat popsicle.

AndyG is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Townsville
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by csb View Post
I really like the idea of driverless cars - there are many positive benefits.
Completely driverless traffic would seem to be the logical conclusion.
There are many benefits from a community organisation perspective, assuming it all works.

Many (including I) will resist compulsory vehicle automation. Some (many? I dunno) humans measure their self worth by their skills and abilities. They will demand manual control of their lives (travel included). Nothing against auto travel for any volunteers. Hell, even I'd take a JohnnyCab sometime, if the need arose.

I don't know if I'm stretching the argument too far, but this seems akin to abolishing real food, and putting everyone on a perfect balanced diet of pills/IV fluids. More... efficient, you know...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement