Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 11 votes, 5.00 average.
  #21  
Old 29-12-2015, 09:07 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
For visual, there's nothing to beat the ol' Genesis 4" f5.
This has been with me for almost thirty years - other scopes have come and gone, but the Genesis is a 110% keeper.
In fact, I've already measured up my "box" and when I go - it goes with me.......
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:04 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
I'm gonna use mine to light my pyre....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:10 AM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 508
Morton,
Depends how much CA you'll tolerate. For a standard doublet 4", f/12 is about the minimum, and I could see CA in my f/15 4" doublet.
ED glass helps, for sure, but I still wouldn't go below f/9, personally.
Obviously, if usage is primarily lower powers, then your f/7 to f/9 range is OK. And there are a plethora of minus violet filters available for specific scopes and targets.
I just rarely meet someone using a scope like this who is not into viewing the Moon and planets.
Given the prices on decent Asian-made triplet refractors these days, there isn't really much reason to stick to doublets unless weight is an issue (doublets are considerably lighter). I'm seeing the triplet edging out the ED doublet in terms of sales since so many triplets are out there now from several companies. Also because ES is selling the 102ED triplet for $1099.99 in the States right now. Is it more than $1800AUD for you guys?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:35 AM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
I found the CA in the SV110ED tolerable on planets. Wouldn't mind a bit less CA though, hence the thought of something with a higher spec this time.

Haven't seen many ES scopes here. There's one dealer who lists them but after hearing about some issues with their stock (of ES scopes) I'm not really interested.

Any thoughts on the Vixen ED103S?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:40 AM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Spring the extra money for a Tak FC-100DF. You definitely won't regret it.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:56 AM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 508
I have limited experience with the Vixen f/7.7 103S-ED refractor.
The one I looked through (can't remember the brand of diagonal) was only so-so optically. I cannot say whether the owner had bothered to collimate or not, and a lot of refractors come out of the box uncollimated.
I've seen a whole bunch of these in the field over time, but all had cameras attached and weren't being used visually.
I think I agree with Larryp.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:56 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
I suppose the proof of the pudding is only there in an image.
Picked at random from a row taken last moon.
I'm presuming the focus was reasonable - it's a single image.
No filtering and no adjustment at all.
Just had a look, focus isn't perfect, it's actually better with a better sky too -
It's a DSLR image @ about 1/250 sec throught the Saxon F9 100ED
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_8884.jpg)
174.1 KB80 views
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:57 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Just bide your time and see what comes up in the classifieds. Apart from Tak and Vixen, WO has been putting out very nice optics in recent years and they finally have a good quality R&P focuser. I'm not so keen on ES due to sample variability.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 29-12-2015, 10:59 AM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
I agree with Larry as well, except the financial controller WOULD make me regret it!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 29-12-2015, 11:03 AM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by casstony View Post
Just bide your time and see what comes up in the classifieds. Apart from Tak and Vixen, WO has been putting out very nice optics in recent years and they finally have a good quality R&P focuser. I'm not so keen on ES due to sample variability.
Good advice, although biding my time isn't something I do well when it comes to astro gear. There's always the danger that some other expense uses up the money first.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 29-12-2015, 12:46 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
Since I have an affinity with Stellarvue scopes I've put a wanted ad for one. There have been a few of their triplets sold here as well as the ED doublets so you never know. My dream scope used to be a Stardust Blue SV4...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:45 AM
johngwheeler (John)
Registered User

johngwheeler is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
What about the Explore Scientific 102mm ED APO Triplet, f7, 714mm focal length. I have the 80mm version and it is a very nice scope. Currently on sale in the US for $1099 USD.
It's not a TAK but It's solid, well built, and the optics seem very good - well at least my 80mm does.
I found the ES 80 triplet that I bought from AEC to be rather disappointing, and exchanged it a Tak FC100 DF. Admittedly, it must have an ex-demo or something that had been knocking around for a few years and so had some annoying mechanical defects & missing parts, but even allowing for this, I found the field curvature to be bothersome.

I may have been expecting too much from an 80mm f/6 Apo. It was very good on terrestrial objects and would be great birding scope, but I wanted sharper stars from a refractor. Maybe it was just a duff example!

I don't have any experience with StellarVue, but they seem to sit nicely in the price/quality curve.

I would also have a look at the Orion Eon line (Bintel have them).

Cheers,

John
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:50 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Hi Morton,

I'm fairly sure Stellavue, Orion and others were assembling scopes using ED doublets in the 80-130mm range from a chinese factory mass-producing these, possibly Kunming Optical. The only question IMHO was whether all received lenses at random, or whether some (e.g. StellaVue) were paying more to cherrypick the best ones off the production line.

In any case its a pity you didn't ask when I was selling my Orion ED105 f/7 last year, optically it was as good as one could expect for an ED at that focal ratio. At high power it gave a nice Airy disk with a hint of colour inside/outside focus. Field curvature did exist - not bothersome visually, but for imaging you could nail that with a flattener, a few to choose from. You'd have to go to a triplet or alternatively an ED doublet at about f/10 to do significantly better at the same aperture.

Last edited by Wavytone; 03-01-2016 at 10:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 24-06-2016, 10:17 AM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
A belated update to this thread. Having briefly been the owner of a Tak FS-102 that I couldn't really afford, I've managed to buy back my old SV110ED.

First re-light expected tonight as the forecast looks good for the weekend.

Here she is awaiting darkness with my recently acquired vintage C8.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SV110ED_return_ 001.jpg)
129.8 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 24-06-2016, 10:33 AM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,059
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 25-06-2016, 07:43 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortonH View Post
A belated update to this thread. Having briefly been the owner of a Tak FS-102 that I couldn't really afford, I've managed to buy back my old SV110ED.
First re-light expected tonight as the forecast looks good for the weekend
Here she is awaiting darkness with my recently acquired vintage C8.

How did 'First again' light go Morton? I am taking the TOA out tonight to try out some birthday oculars.....

I may head to Medlow Bath next weekend with both scopes.....
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 25-06-2016, 10:12 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
By far the best quality 4 inch class APO ( yes I class these as APO,s) is the Skywatcher 100mm ED f9 these are amazing using FPL53 for little money .

1/4 the price of a Tak but 95% of the views , a no-brainer if on a budget like most of us .

Just google Synta 100mm ED f9 reviews there are 1000,s of happy customers world wide.

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 25-06-2016, 02:44 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunama View Post
How did 'First again' light go Morton? I am taking the TOA out tonight to try out some birthday oculars.....

I may head to Medlow Bath next weekend with both scopes.....

First light didn't really happen last night. I did take the scope out on the balcony but it was windy and the seeing was awful. Mars and Saturn were just jumping around so I canned it. Tonight is looking much more promising.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 25-06-2016, 02:52 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian nordstrom View Post
By far the best quality 4 inch class APO ( yes I class these as APO,s) is the Skywatcher 100mm ED f9 these are amazing using FPL53 for little money .

1/4 the price of a Tak but 95% of the views , a no-brainer if on a budget like most of us .

Just google Synta 100mm ED f9 reviews there are 1000,s of happy customers world wide.

Brian.

I agree. I spent a few weeks debating whether to buy my old SV or a 100ED but in the end I wanted the superior mechanics and larger aperture of the Stellarvue.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 25-06-2016, 03:13 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,774
Bintel now has an EOFY sale on - the Black Diamond ED100 is only $1,000

That night have tempted me a bit more!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement