#1  
Old 30-11-2015, 10:12 PM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,161
Colour of Uranus

Stupid name for a planet! In a sense, what I've done here is a pointless exercise because we know that Uranus is a cyan colour and we know that when we split the light from Uranus we get an optical spectrum like the one I posted in the previous thread.

On the other hand, all I actually got was a Zero Order image of Uranus as a pure white over-exposed blob, and a low-res optical spectrum. You should be able to sum the spectrum to show the visible colour of Uranus. All I did was compress the bar spectrum of Uranus down to one pixel in width using Photoshop. This effectively averages the colour but produces a dim, dark colour representation, not helped by the spectrum being a little under-exposed. To increase brightness and intensity to complete the 'summing' I applied levels and saturation, somewhat arbitrarily but hey!

My processing skills are somewhat Neanderthal and I'm sure there'd be better ways of summing the spectrum (but hopefully not returning to the white of the over-exposed Zero Order image!).

Cheers -
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Colour of Uranus text.jpg)
144.5 KB76 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-11-2015, 10:13 PM
Somnium's Avatar
Somnium (Aidan)
Aidan

Somnium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob_K View Post
Stupid name for a planet!
it''s better than George !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2015, 03:54 AM
robin_astro
Registered User

robin_astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Hi Rob,

Unfortunately gratings are not equally efficient at all wavelengths (The efficency of the blazed Star Analyser grating peaks at ~500-550nm in the green and drops off into the red and blue) so summing the light in the spectrum without correcting for this will introduce a colour cast. (The zero order contains most of the rest of the light missing from the spectrum and usually appears red-ish if not not overexposed)

Robin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2015, 01:46 PM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somnium View Post
it''s better than George !
Reminds me of an episode of Futurama, where the Professor says "we changed the name to Urectum because of complaints"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2015, 12:19 AM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,190
Nice one Rob, interesting in deed , ,
-
-
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
Reminds me of an episode of Futurama, where the Professor says "we changed the name to Urectum because of complaints"
Not only did 'U-Rec-tum' --you very near 'Killed-tum'

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2015, 05:06 PM
ralph1
cloud magnet

ralph1 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
The 'levels raised' version looks the closest to how the planet looks visually.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-12-2015, 01:23 AM
Pi-Eyed's Avatar
Pi-Eyed (Berty)
Reverse Polish Notation

Pi-Eyed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somnium View Post
it''s better than George !
What's wrong with George?


Last edited by Pi-Eyed; 19-12-2015 at 01:51 AM. Reason: sqelling
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement