Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 15-05-2017, 12:13 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Rick,

I ran BackgroundNeutralization, balanced colour and DBE on my combined image. Unlocking the STF yielded the minutest change in star colour, so, my colour balance should have been pretty spot on.

What I might try doing is a DBE on each channel before running LinearFit. I understand that it is often best to LinearFit to the channel with the lowest signal, otherwise you run the risk of increasing noise if trying to fit low signal channels to high signal ones. Makes sense. So, this time, I will try to fit to SII instead of OIII. At any rate, it can't hurt to try.

If you can email me a copy of your script to my email, I'd appreciate it. I'll send you a message on spacebook.

Many thanks for your detailed reply.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
H,

The choice of LinearFit reference can make a difference but I haven't found a way to predict the best choice. I usually just pick one at random and work with the result.

A green bias is very common even after a LinearFit. DBE or BackgroundNeutralization will go a way towards fixing it. After a stretch I normally use the ColorMask script (not part of the standard distribution yet but you can get it on the PI forum or ask me for a copy) to do something equivalent to the Bob Franke method for PS (http://bf-astro.com/hubblep.htm). Colour masking is actually more powerful than PS selective color because you can apply a range of tools to the masked image.

Removing the stars from the colour image (keep them in the synthetic luminance) works really well too. That's the core thing I took from JPM's tone mapping. It gets rid of those horrid magenta stars It also allows you to do heavy noise reduction and a much bigger stretch on the weaker NB filters to get a lot more latitude with colour adjustment.

Cheers,
Rick.
Tim,

Thanks, sir. Glad it appeals to you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by topheart View Post
Hi Humayun,
I really like the image. Well done!

The colour scheme creates a unique feel to the image which appeals to me.

An interesting discussion also ...thanks!
Cheers,
Tim
Rom,

Thanks, mate. Can't wait to post the final rendition soon!

Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
What a fabulous short. Looks almost 3D. Just beautiful

Mike,

Thank you, very much! I paid a great deal of attention to the centre/brightest areas (after 60 hours of exposure, it was quite bright and was very conducive to bringing out the fainter structures by bringing the midtones down).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
I displayed your excellent image to SHO because that's what I'm familiar with. It looks great. Regardless of mapping, there is exquisite depth and detail. Good judgement call on the balance between the faintest and brightest structures, leaving excellent mid-tone contrast. Lovely composition too. Fantastic work.

Best,
Mike
Thank you, one and all.

H
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15-05-2017, 08:46 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
What I might try doing is a DBE on each channel before running LinearFit. I understand that it is often best to LinearFit to the channel with the lowest signal, otherwise you run the risk of increasing noise if trying to fit low signal channels to high signal ones. Makes sense. So, this time, I will try to fit to SII instead of OIII. At any rate, it can't hurt to try.
Hi H,

Sounds reasonable but the weakest channel still needs to be stretched to match the others for a good colour balance so the noise is going to get increased anyway. That's another thing addressed in JPM's tone mapping technique - you can do a heavy noise reduction on the weak channels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
If you can email me a copy of your script to my email, I'd appreciate it. I'll send you a message on spacebook.
Will do! There is an example of its use here: https://pixinsight.com/forum/index.php?topic=7751.0

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 15-05-2017, 11:45 PM
Star Catcher (Ted Dobosz)
Registered User

Star Catcher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 981
Well that is a different looking palette! Lovely details in the image. I admire the effort you put into this image. Obviously good enough tracking to do the job
Ted
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 25-05-2017, 12:56 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Thanks again, Rick.

And, thanks, Ted!

With Rick's awesome ColorMask script and altering the amount of hydrogen alpha, I have come to process a normal SHO palette and it looks pretty good to me. I might make an alternate version, in this palette, too.

Still trying to find time to do the LRGB combine for the stars!

H
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 25-05-2017, 01:31 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
No problem, H. Look forward to the latest results!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement