ANZAC Day
Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-05-2017, 02:32 PM
Star Catcher (Ted Dobosz)
Registered User

Star Catcher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 981
Ha Longish Exposures NG3576 & NGC3372

Hi All

I've been having some tracking issues with my G11 mount and following some maintenance with the help of a friend I decided to test it with some longish exposures.

The first image is the nebulae complex including NGC 3576, 3579, 3581, 3582, 3584, 3603, 3856. The image was taken through an RC10 using an STL6303E camera. The image consist of 6 X 60 minute subs through 7nm Ha Filter. On the right you can see why some people call it the statue of liberty nebula.

The second image using the same equipment, is a segment of the Carina nebula. Eta Carinae is just outside of the field on the right hand side of the image. This is a fairly deep image because it consists of a 1 X 150 minute exposure.

Whilst the high cloud and seeing conditions reduced the depth of this exposure, it did not interrupt the guiding and I am now much happier with the tracking performance.

Thanks for looking.

Ted
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC3586 Small.jpg)
199.7 KB99 views
Click for full-size image (3372 Small.jpg)
172.5 KB82 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-05-2017, 02:44 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,612
Nice work Ted,
You've a great polar alignment not to get frame rotation with that length of sub frame.
I hope you'll take some RGB too?

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-05-2017, 03:13 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,051
Impressive Subs Ted. You have to be happy with that tracking. But i have to ask why? The risk you take in putting that much time into a single Sub would not warrant a single Sub of that duration, imho. As a demonstration its a great result.a tribute to your setup for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-05-2017, 04:46 PM
Star Catcher (Ted Dobosz)
Registered User

Star Catcher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Impressive Subs Ted. You have to be happy with that tracking. But i have to ask why? The risk you take in putting that much time into a single Sub would not warrant a single Sub of that duration, imho. As a demonstration its a great result.a tribute to your setup for sure.
Thanks Glen. Well because I can . Sort of like.... why climb a taller mountain? No but seriously I was curious to see what exposure limit is possible from my Sydney suburban observatory location and to test the mount. I do understand the limitations from things like seeing conditions on the resolution and risks from wind & clouds during long exposures. There are I believe however some advantages doing longer subs.
Ted

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Nice work Ted,
You've a great polar alignment not to get frame rotation with that length of sub frame.
I hope you'll take some RGB too?

cheers
Allan
Thanks Alan. Unfortunately being in the suburbs of Sydney, RGB filters are a problem. Si and O3 are an option in the near future.
Ted
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-05-2017, 05:42 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Bravo and well done.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-05-2017, 11:35 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Sliiiiightly over processed perhaps but, still, looks like the mount adjustments/repairs worked a treat Ted, you must be relieved?...150min single exposure??? wow! LOok forward to seeing your future images

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-05-2017, 04:54 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
That single 150min exposure looks brilliant! The best I'd ever managed with my EQ6 was 60min and even that was a little bit eggy. Your G11 must be humming along something nicely
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-05-2017, 05:28 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Exquisite detail you have in this object. Which reminds me that I have to revisit it soon.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-05-2017, 07:22 PM
Star Catcher (Ted Dobosz)
Registered User

Star Catcher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Exquisite detail you have in this object. Which reminds me that I have to revisit it soon.
Thank you Kevin. I have only imaged it once before and this is a much better effort. I have to admit it is one object I keep forgetting about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
That single 150min exposure looks brilliant! The best I'd ever managed with my EQ6 was 60min and even that was a little bit eggy. Your G11 must be humming along something nicely
Thanks Colin. It is the longest I have ever done. Happy with the mount, now if only it just stays that way The G11 can be testy sometimes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Sliiiiightly over processed perhaps but, still, looks like the mount adjustments/repairs worked a treat Ted, you must be relieved?...150min single exposure??? wow! LOok forward to seeing your future images

Thanks Mike, yes agree a tad overcooked to try to overcome the seeing blur over the 150minutes. Happy with things now without the strange jumps in tracking. Looking forward to doing Si and O3 in the near future.

Mike
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Bravo and well done.
Thank you Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-05-2017, 09:44 PM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,190
Awesome Test images Ted, , wow 150 mins - to infinity and beyoooond
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-05-2017, 12:03 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
That's pretty damn amazing to get such good stars after 150 minutes at that focal length!

What did you do to the mount to get it performing that way? I only just pulled mine apart last month for the first time in over 10 years of owning it. I cleaned all the bearings and shafts, regreased it all with lithium grease and put it back together again. I didn't touch the worms or their housing (not confident enough). I'm stoked to get 30 minutes out of my G-11 with round stars; admittedly, I've never tried pushing it any further than that as I try to make use of every clear night I possibly can, either doing narrowband or full colour when the Moon isn't around.

Really interested to know what magic you've wielded to get it to work that well!

H
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-05-2017, 03:51 PM
Star Catcher (Ted Dobosz)
Registered User

Star Catcher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bankstown
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by astronobob View Post
Awesome Test images Ted, , wow 150 mins - to infinity and beyoooond
Thank you Bob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
That's pretty damn amazing to get such good stars after 150 minutes at that focal length!

What did you do to the mount to get it performing that way? I only just pulled mine apart last month for the first time in over 10 years of owning it. I cleaned all the bearings and shafts, regreased it all with lithium grease and put it back together again. I didn't touch the worms or their housing (not confident enough). I'm stoked to get 30 minutes out of my G-11 with round stars; admittedly, I've never tried pushing it any further than that as I try to make use of every clear night I possibly can, either doing narrowband or full colour when the Moon isn't around.

Really interested to know what magic you've wielded to get it to work that well!

H
Thanks H. No magic here but perhaps a bit of luck. I pretty much did what you did. All the needle bearings had stopped rolling with hardened grease. So they got cleaned up and re-lubed.

I also removed both the RA and Dec worms and worm blocks. Thoroughly cleaned the worm. Plenty of crap in amongst the grease. That grease is really tough to clean but mineral turps did the best job. Then re-lubed both worms.

I then checked the endplay between the bearing blocks. The RA worm assembly is the Losmandy's one piece unit. It had no play what so ever, so I slightly relieved the pressure by introducing just a very tiny hint of play. I then reassembled into position.

The next effort was to ensure optimal meshing with main gear i.e. tangential and loaded with right pressure. Gee it would have been great to have this assembly was spring loaded! Several ways to do this including being able to turn the worm by fingers as a good indicator. I took the lazy suck it and see way. Not sure it has sound logic though

I unclutched the shaft in down position and held the worm block against the main gear with gentle pressure. I then gently rocked the shaft and felt the force on the work block from side to side. I tried to find a center point of that rock i.e. no force felt on the opposite side after shaft is let go from being forced on the other side. I then tried to keep the block in this position whilst I did it up. The DEC assembly has less opportunity for imprecise positioning of the worm, other than you can slightly change meshing pressure and angle.

I then did some unloaded slewing tests. If these sounded OK and no binding occurred, I then loaded up the mount and did slew tests. If all OK I then mounted a camera. I started with taking a couple of unguided exposures around the 4 minute mark. Of course the assumption is that I have close to perfect polar alignment (I'm close).

I checked the consistency of the PE across those exposures. If the PE streaks look fairly continuous i.e. no jumps and of similar length, then good. If not then you can use the adjustment on the Losmandy one piece block to slightly alter meshing characteristic.

Next is to check how well the mount responds to guiding corrections during one period of the worm. This is where things like bias balance in RA has to be investigated to see what inconsistencies can be moderated. We need to see the rate of error and where they occur in the cycle. Various pieces of software can give you this feedback This is also where you detect whether the DEC correction have problems. If inertia is significant you may get motor lags errors. You may have to play with pressures of the DEC worm block against the main gear. Then depending on the results and how fussy you are, you may go back and repeat earlier steps.

Anyhow I have no idea if any of this made a difference or I was just chasing shadows and jagged a good part of the main gear. I am sure others have a more sane way or achieving the same deal
Ted
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement