#1  
Old 11-04-2017, 03:57 PM
04Stefan07 (Stefan)
Make it so! - Capt.Picard

04Stefan07 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,982
Should I upgrade to 2"?

I currently use two Celestron 1.25" X-Cel LX 25mm and 9mm eyepieces for viewing but since I have a 2" diagonal I was wondering if it's worth getting rid of these and buying a few 2" eyepieces.

Telescope I use is in my signature below.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2017, 07:42 PM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,097
Hello Stefan. I went through this a while ago and Ive got to say that I am unable to justify the cost increase. Compared to my 1.25" eyepieces, the only advantage I found was that I had more real estate around my objects, it didn't make them any better, brighter or larger etc. If you have really dark skies and want to view extended objects, it may help. If you have a large aperture telescope that makes the objects appear bigger in your eyepiece, the extended field may help there as well.

I love my very beautiful 2" WO dielctric diagonal, but for now, it's 1.25" for me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2017, 08:39 PM
MortonH's Avatar
MortonH
Deprived of starlight

MortonH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,770
In a C8 most objects will fit in the field of a 1.25" eyepiece but sometimes the view can feel a little restricted and sometimes it's just not wide enough. I currently have a 2" 30mm Paragon (68 degrees) on loan and it's great in my C8. I'm now considering a 2" 30-35mm eyepiece of my own.

Bear in mind that for an f/10 system like the C8 you don't need to buy the most well corrected eyepieces like Panoptics and Naglers and therefore don't need to spend a fortune.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2017, 09:44 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
I can second the Paragon suggestion, they're pretty lightweight too for a 2" eyepiece.

So long as you can look past a little field curvature and a dash of coma you can eek out about 1.4 degrees from a C8...it just won't look the same as an apo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-04-2017, 12:29 AM
04Stefan07 (Stefan)
Make it so! - Capt.Picard

04Stefan07 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,982
If I can get my hands on a cheap 2" eyepiece I might give it a go, or even have a borrow of someones at a star party. As mentioned given the price increase I didn't think I would need new barlows and filters as well so I might stick with 1.25" for now.

It is a good topic to talk about though and I think it should keep being discussed as everyone has a different viewpoint and contributes to the wider discussion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement