Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 13-10-2014, 05:33 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,175
Awesome Mike and Trish.. reeeally amazing depth and resolution.

Only other image I have seen of the Helix that goes as deep and shows those intricate fine shock fronts as well is one by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) Interesting that the Ha features match the UV ones so well.

Man, I wish you had a slightly larger FOV...?..mozaic perhaps

Great scope and mount and observatory you have

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 13-10-2014, 05:38 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,064
That's just nuts, insane depth right there . Goes to show what 1 hr subs on serious appature can do. And bin 2 too, excellent
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 13-10-2014, 06:34 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Marcus, Russell, Simon, Clive, Richard,

Thanks for the encouragement.

Best,
Mike n Trish
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 13-10-2014, 06:40 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Only other image I have seen of the Helix that goes as deep and shows those intricate fine shock fronts as well is one by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) Interesting that the Ha features match the UV ones so well.
Mike
Hi, Mike,
That Galex shot is just jaw-dropping. Thanks for the link.

Best,
Mike n Trish
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 13-10-2014, 06:46 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Goes to show what 1 hr subs on serious aperture can do. And bin 2 too
Cheers, Fred. Vaguely wonder whether to try even longer 2x2 subs one day. Unbinned, there's no great advantage, but 2x2 I'm not sure of the maths.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 13-10-2014, 07:26 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Gobsmacking Mike!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 13-10-2014, 07:39 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,610
Hi Mike,
What an amazing photo.
I am sure it has scientific value.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 13-10-2014, 08:21 PM
Rod771's Avatar
Rod771 (Rod)
Turn the lights off!

Rod771 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Parklea NSW
Posts: 1,207
Incredible!! Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 13-10-2014, 09:23 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,452
That's an awesome Image, Mike and Trish. Incredible detail. Top Job!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 13-10-2014, 09:32 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
GULP!!!!!

Wow indeed
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 14-10-2014, 08:09 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Cheers, Rod, Allan, Geoff, David, Xeno in Lux Urbis,

Thanks muchly. Glad you like it.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 14-10-2014, 08:17 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,896
That really picked up some fine detail. Nice and deep. The main feature here I think are those fine shock fronts you mentioned. I haven't seen them before.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 14-10-2014, 08:39 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,944
Exclamation

The binning would account for why I was struggling to get much with the 12" with 30 minute subs at 1x1. This has got me thinking now. Binning will reduce resolution a lot on the 12, so I am wonder how long I would need to go to capture the same amount of photons. I think over 1 hour per sub.

Excellent detail. Inspiring image.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 14-10-2014, 08:46 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Nice explanation and image. I tried 50 hours with the FSQ and 16803 unbinned and did not get any of the faint structures seen above the main "v" structure to the left. Well done.

j
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 14-10-2014, 08:56 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,302
Wow!



Al.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 14-10-2014, 09:18 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
The binning would account for why I was struggling to get much with the 12" with 30 minute subs at 1x1. This has got me thinking now. Binning will reduce resolution a lot on the 12, so I am wonder how long I would need to go to capture the same amount of photons. I think over 1 hour per sub.
Hi, Paul,
Thanks muchly! With 0.55 sec arc pixels and very best 2 sec arc seeing, we're not quite critically sampled 2x2, so we're elsewhere messing around combining 1x1 for stars and highlights, 2x2 for faint nebulosity, and pro rata in between. The technique fails miserably with small faint background galaxies, but seems good for extended stuff. Will have something to show soon.

That said, your shots are hugely sharper than ours!

Best,
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 14-10-2014, 12:23 PM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,462
Inspirational Mike and Trish! Fantastic effort with the results to show.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 14-10-2014, 02:19 PM
Mighty_oz (Marcus)
Registered User

Mighty_oz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atm somewhere in Perth
Posts: 575
Fantastic picture You should get an APOD for this !
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 14-10-2014, 02:43 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus View Post
Hi, Paul,
Thanks muchly! With 0.55 sec arc pixels and very best 2 sec arc seeing, we're not quite critically sampled 2x2, so we're elsewhere messing around combining 1x1 for stars and highlights, 2x2 for faint nebulosity, and pro rata in between. The technique fails miserably with small faint background galaxies, but seems good for extended stuff. Will have something to show soon.

That said, your shots are hugely sharper than ours!

Best,
Mike
Yes my seeing contributes to that sharpness. Often quite good. I might have to try 2x2 binning on the helix as a test myself to get that faint stuff out.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 14-10-2014, 02:56 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
John, Al, Joshua, Marcus,
Thanks very much indeed.
Cheers,
Mike n Trish
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement