Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-08-2020, 11:01 PM
Greggles (Gregory)
Registered User

Greggles is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 75
Jupiter & saturn first serious planetary imaging

Hi all,

I finally bought a planetary imaging cam the zwo asi462 and gave it a go on thursday night.

Still learning but happy for my first go.

Not exactly sure on what I'm doing regarding post processing so made lots of different edits with the autostakkert sharpened and unsharpened versions. Some times I got better results with unsharpened and sometimes with sharpened haha

As you can see, I seem to have a tendency to over process! Oops.

Any tips welcome!

ZWO ASI462
Baader Ir and uv filter
2x barlow
Bintel/gso 10"dobsonian f5
DIY eq platform
Firecapture

Cheers

Greg
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2020-08-20-1151_2-U-L-Jup_lapl4_ap31_conv ps jpg.jpg)
72.0 KB141 views
Click for full-size image (rotated .jpg)
68.2 KB150 views
Click for full-size image (redgi edit ps jpg.jpg)
42.8 KB151 views
Click for full-size image (2020-08-20-1151_2-U-L-Jup_lapl4_ap31 regi ps jpg.jpg)
76.6 KB121 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-08-2020, 10:29 AM
Tulloch's Avatar
Tulloch (Andrew)
Registered User

Tulloch is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 488
Really nice images Greg, especially for your first time out, we all overprocess when we start out

Based on the size of your Jupiter image (and your aperture and camera), I estimate you are imaging at about f/11.1 (or 3.8x the pixel size of your camera) which is pretty close to optimal.

The sharpening tool in AS!3 is only really meant to be an indicator, there are better programs out there for sharpening (Registax is the default standard, but Astra Image and a newish program called AstroSurface are also used).

Can you give more details of your capture process? Capture time, frame rates, that sort of thing? FireCapture records a logfile for every session, if you want post one of them, that would be helpful too.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-08-2020, 10:12 PM
Greggles (Gregory)
Registered User

Greggles is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulloch View Post
Really nice images Greg, especially for your first time out, we all overprocess when we start out

Based on the size of your Jupiter image (and your aperture and camera), I estimate you are imaging at about f/11.1 (or 3.8x the pixel size of your camera) which is pretty close to optimal.

The sharpening tool in AS!3 is only really meant to be an indicator, there are better programs out there for sharpening (Registax is the default standard, but Astra Image and a newish program called AstroSurface are also used).

Can you give more details of your capture process? Capture time, frame rates, that sort of thing? FireCapture records a logfile for every session, if you want post one of them, that would be helpful too.

Andrew
Hey Andrew,

Yeah, you are probably spot on. F5 x2 barlow so F10 or there abouts. I have a 3x ED barlow to get me to around f15 which is about optimal but haven''t used it yet.

Unfortunately i've already deleted the .ser and log files as my laptop hit capacity and needed space for next session just got the un edited stacks.


I captured in 600x600 around around 3 minutes for both Jupiter and Saturn. Couldn't go longer for Saturrn due to drift and only just learnt about the Autoaline feature which is plan on using next time out. Frame rates were between 90-120 for Jupiter and i cant remember for saturn but was quite a bit lower from memory.

autostakkert - 75% stacks seemed best quality anything lower than 35% had a square artifacts.

Registax wavelets (no idea what i''m doing just guessing) and RGB balance.

final sharpen and curves in Photoshop.


Oh and the Jupiter edit without the BRS was a winjupos image denotation of 3 of the images. Tried with Saturn but couldn't get it working properly.

cheers Greg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2020, 09:37 AM
Tulloch's Avatar
Tulloch (Andrew)
Registered User

Tulloch is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 488
Thanks Greg, sounds like you need a big 4TB external hard drive (that's what I use to store my video files ). Even if you delete the videos, the log files are small and worth hanging onto (and possibly still in your trash area).

Sounds like you have the basics covered, you can work out what actual focal length/focal ratio using this equation (from here).

http://www.wilmslowastro.com/softwar.../formula28.png

FYI, here is an example of one of my log files for Jupiter, you could use it as a guide if you want.

Try stacking less frames in AS!3 - if you start getting squares then try increasing the AP size. Registax is a real hit and miss affair, just need to play around a bit and see what happens.

I don't use WinJupos for image stacking (for a variety of reasons), I'd concentrate less on that for now...

Andrew
Attached Files
File Type: txt 2020-08-16-1034_7-L-Jup.txt (950 Bytes, 114 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-08-2020, 11:44 PM
Greggles (Gregory)
Registered User

Greggles is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulloch View Post
Thanks Greg, sounds like you need a big 4TB external hard drive (that's what I use to store my video files ). Even if you delete the videos, the log files are small and worth hanging onto (and possibly still in your trash area).

Sounds like you have the basics covered, you can work out what actual focal length/focal ratio using this equation (from here).

http://www.wilmslowastro.com/softwar.../formula28.png

FYI, here is an example of one of my log files for Jupiter, you could use it as a guide if you want.

Try stacking less frames in AS!3 - if you start getting squares then try increasing the AP size. Registax is a real hit and miss affair, just need to play around a bit and see what happens.

I don't use WinJupos for image stacking (for a variety of reasons), I'd concentrate less on that for now...

Andrew
Thanks Andrew,

Had a chance to get out again and shoot with the 3x Barlow. Got some much better results with Saturn, Attached was actually edited with astrosurface as per your post below. I quite like using it for Saturn, but for Jupiter i couldn't get as good results compared to registax.

Jupiter log:

FireCapture v2.7 01 BETA Settings
------------------------------------
Observer=Unknown
Location=Unknown_City
Scope=Unknown_Scope
Camera=ZWO ASI462MC
Filter=L
Profile=Jupiter
Diameter=45.13"
Magnitude=-2.61
CMI=102.8° CMII=141.7° CMIII=229.3° (during mid of capture)
FocalLength=4000mm (F/17)
Resolution=0.15"
Filename=2020-08-24-1059_1-U-L-Jup.ser
Date=240820
Start=105745.411
Mid=105906.158
End=110026.906
Start(UT)=105745.411
Mid(UT)=105906.158
End(UT)=110026.906
Duration=161.495s
Date_format=ddMMyy
Time_format=HHmmss
LT=UT +10h
Frames captured=14245
File type=SER
Binning=1x1
Bit depth=8bit
Debayer=yes
DebayerAlgorithm=NearestNeighbor
BayerPattern=RG
ROI=1024x768
ROI(Offset)=192x152
FPS (avg.)=88
Shutter=4.578ms
Gain=278 (46%)
AutoExposure=off
AutoGain=off
AutoHisto=75 (off)
Brightness=1
FPS=100 (off)
Gamma=41
HighSpeed=off
SoftwareGain=10 (off)
USBTraffic=100
WBlue=90
WGreenOffset=0 (off)
WRed=50
Histogramm(min)=0
Histogramm(max)=0
Histogramm=0%
Noise(avg.deviation)=n/a
eADU=0.028
AutoAlign=true
PreFilter=none
Limit=none
Sensor temperature=22.3°C

cheers,

Greg
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2020-08-24-1107_4-U-L-Sat_lapl4_ap36_conv astrosurface ps JPEG.jpg)
79.3 KB116 views
Click for full-size image (jupiter jpg.jpg)
147.2 KB102 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-08-2020, 08:30 AM
Tulloch's Avatar
Tulloch (Andrew)
Registered User

Tulloch is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 488
Excellent images Greg, especially Saturn, you can make out the Cassini Division right to the front of the rings, and even a hint of the polar hexagon! Jupiter is possibly a bit over-cooked, but there's certainly lots of detail there.

Thanks for posting your logfile, I'll just comment on a few items I noticed that stand out.

FireCapture v2.7 01 BETA Settings
------------------------------------

Duration=161.495s <---- could increase to 180 (300 for Saturn)
Debayer=yes <---- for best performance and higher fps, record the RAW footage (ie not debayered), and debayer in AS!3. Recording the debayered video also makes your video file 3x larger as you are recording 3 colours, not 1
ROI=1024x768 <---- Reduce the ROI size, unless you are interested in capturing the moons, all you are recording is black space and this reduces your capture rate
FPS (avg.)=88
Shutter=4.578ms <---- With this shutter speed, the maximum fps possible is 218, but you are capturing at 88, due to the larger ROI and recording the colour information.
Gain=278 (46%)
Gamma=41 <---- Record with gamma OFF, you can add this later
HighSpeed=off <---- Record with HighSpeed ON
USBTraffic=100 <---- If you start losing frames, try a slightly lower value for better results, I set it to 70
WBlue=90 <---- I believe this should be closer to 86
WRed=50 <---- I believe this should be closer to 69

A lot of the locations for these settings are in this post, but it was for ver 2.6 rather than 2.7, but most things are in a similar spot
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=185290

Debayering in AS!3 is the best way to take these images - yes, it looks terrible on the screen while recording, blocky and monochrome, but it's the best way to do it.

Reducing the ROI during recording is also highly recommended. Yes, you might have to make slight corrections during capture to keep the planet in the FOV, but the file sizes are smaller and the frame rate can be higher. Firecapture shows you a continuous update on how many frames per second it is recording, both while recording and when observing. Try to match the shutter speed to the fps value indicated, if you set the shutter speed to 5ms, then the fps rate should be 200. Set it to 10ms then you should see 100fps. This way you are not "wasting light" by having to increase the gain to get the histogram level up, but not getting the frame rate to match.

The USBTraffic value is a strange one, ZWO cameras tend to like to hog all the resources, so if you let it have 100% of them then it can overflow the USB buffer and you lose frames. Setting a value too low reduces the fps value. I find a value of 70 is about right for my computer, ymmv.

Do not record with the Gamma value on, it may make the image look better on the screen, but you can make all those corrections afterward on the computer. Record as pure a video stream as possible.

Based on previous result from the ASI462MC, I reckon the Wred and Wblue values should be set at 69 and 86 respectively. This was from another CN post which is shown below.
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/7...#entry10376048

With a few little tweaks and a bit more practice, your images will improve even further, and you are already significantly ahead of where you were

Hope this helps, Andrew

Last edited by Tulloch; 26-08-2020 at 08:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-08-2020, 01:24 PM
miketheobscure's Avatar
miketheobscure (Mike Kreuzer)
...

miketheobscure is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greggles View Post
Hey Andrew,

Unfortunately i've already deleted the .ser and log files as my laptop hit capacity and needed space for next session

cheers Greg
This, this is the story of my life now

Your Saturn especially is great, & for your only second attempt, amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-08-2020, 09:38 AM
Greggles (Gregory)
Registered User

Greggles is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulloch View Post
Hope this helps, Andrew
Thanks Mike

And thank you Andrew,. Wow, what an informative post. Cant wait to get out and image again now.

Will make all changes! Dam debrayering, tried to turn it off for when I was doing IR pass images of moon s d coulsnt figure it out. Every time I thought I didnt it still recorded in colour. Will check out post below to sort it out.

Had to use the beta because other version wouldn't pick up the 462

I started recording at 600×600 but my diy mount is just not accurate enough. Its killing me! Currently looking at other options beside my current DC motor drive.

Again thanks for all you advice and support andrew
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-08-2020, 12:41 PM
Tulloch's Avatar
Tulloch (Andrew)
Registered User

Tulloch is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 488
No worries, try for the smallest ROI you can, but if 100 fps is all you can get (which should be the minimum for Jupiter) , set the shutter speed to 10 ms and reduce your gain accordingly to give you 50% histogram levels.

Here is the option you want for recording in raw always - it's in the Image/Debayer menu at the bottom of the Settings window, it's really useful .
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (FC debayer capture settings.PNG)
13.9 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement