#1  
Old 22-12-2008, 10:45 AM
Coen
"Doc"

Coen is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 180
70mm refractor - Ret tour (Dec 19&20)

Continuing learning some of the "lesser" constellations. Notes from a recent set of observations:

19&20 December 2008 local time +10.5 to UT, no Moon

Telescope is 70mm Skywatcher refractor with the 15mm GSO (60x), 10mm basic (90x) and 6mm Plossl (150x).

Seeing very poor and strong breeze makes for shakes.

Planning using Taki's double star atlas, CNebulaX: list of objects compiled. Cartes du Ceil & Star Calc used after observation to orientate sketches and determine what, if anything, was seen.

Night clear, windy: good transparency and bad seeing. Wind strong led to abandoning the viewing by about 11pm.
Viewing commenced around 9:30pm.

Taki's double star atlas map 36. TriAtlas B series map 96 & 107.

RMK3 Theta Ret
Can just see secondary with 60x framed with faint stars near - overall nice.
Increase to 90x definitely see secondary, perhaps greenish - attractive.
Documented: Magnitudes 6.7 & 9.0 at 19.1" - actually a triple but can not split the other with this scope.

60x has NGC 1559 in the same FOV (just) as RMK3. Hard to see, roundish blob perhaps barred? Alpha Ret interfers due to its brightness. Bit of a dancing ball.
Documented: Magnitude 10.4, surface brightness 12.4; 3.5' by 2.0' an SBc.

Zeta 1 & 2
Easily seen, stars down to 11.5 viewed. No chance of seeing third.

Kappa (HJ 3580)
Attempted but not successful. TriAtlas lists star as 7 magnitude companion but CdC has magnitude 10.4 to the 4.8 primary with a separation of 54", the WDS has 4.75 & 10.75 at 54.4". Perhaps the sky was still too bright? Given 11.5 was seen around Zeta this is unlikely.

Inn 150
Just south of Zeta - quickly attempted, not much time spent. Not split. 8.3 & 10.5 separated by 3" according to CNX and 8.2 & 11.0 by CdC at 3.8".

Dun 12
Just south of Zeta 1 and 2 is Inn 150 and just south of Inn 150 is Dun 12. Attractive triangular grouping with stars from neighbouring constellation. Two of the triangle stars are doubles with a further faint double in the middle of the triangle.
Dun 12 is a nice and wide double that has another wide and faint star nearby (magnitude 11.3).
The other triangle double is HJ 3559 at magnitude 6.7 and 10.7 separated by 43" and is located in neighbouring Hor. The secondary is faint and jumps out with averted whilst disappearing with direct vision, also occurs at 90x when it is wider but still blinking.
The faint middle double, also in Hor, is HJ 3562 equalish pair at 9.0 and 9.3 separated by 34" which makes the entire grouping attractive in the wide GSO eyepiece.

HJ 3592
Took a while to find and confirm as it is located a fair way north in the constellation away from its main body. View with 60x was not conclusive but indicated possible faint and close, 90x made the impression stronger, the 150x cased the view to disappear.
Overall hard to tell. Try when the seeing is better.
Documented: Magnitudes 6.5 and 9.3 at 5"

HJ 3670
Nice pair in a sprinkled field, primary is bright and orangish, secondary is faint and distant with colour hard to tell.
Documented: Magnitudes 5.9 and 9.3 at 32"

Viewing on 20th similar to 19th with regards to visibility and seeing, from about 10pm to 11:30pm.

Stumbled upon RMK 4 double nice tight and almost equal, on the Dor/Ret border. Yellow and yellow-orange split with 60x.
Documented: Magnitudes 7.1 & 7.5 at 5.7"

NGC 1574 on the Ret/Dor border near RMK 4. Star appears superimposed on or near the core (unless it is part of the galaxy itself as star is faint). Object seems extended with almost hint of brighter bar across a longer axis. Viewing CdC afterwards indicates an almost elliptical galaxy with a star nearby.
Documented: Magnitude 10.3 Surface brightness 13.3, classed E/SO 4.0' by 3.6'

NGC 1543
Distinctive triangle of stars, galaxy near one of the points. Hint of a fuzzy object almost round near one of them - this is the object. Other almost fuzzy patch near the other point is a group of faint stars.
Documented: Magnitude 10.5, surface brightness 13.2, classed SBO ring 4.7' by 3'

Dun 14
Wide pair with another bright star nearby. Pale yellow and orangish.
Documented: Magnitudes 7.0 & 8.3 at 57"

GLI 28
Faint unequal pair secondary wide but at 10.5 faint, averted makes clearer. PA is towards east from north.
Documented: Magnitudes 8.9 & 10.5 at 41" PA 35deg

HJ 3662
Faint unequal pair primary orange, secondary a challenge & perhaps bluish, nice. PA just south of east.
Documented: Magnitudes 8.3 and 9.8 at 14" PA 111deg

HJ 3600
Similar to HJ 3662, challenging also.
Documented: Magnitudes 8.6 and 9.8 at 22"

NGC 1313
Large faint glow situated between 3 stars in almost equilateral triangle (faint). Picture dances in and out and is very faint.
Documented: Magnitude 9.1, surface brightness 13.5, classed SBcd, 9.2' by 7.2'
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-12-2008, 05:24 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Zeta Talk

Hi Coen,

A very interesting read mate, and thanks for posting it. Very good job tracking down those galaxies in particular in a pretty small 'scope -- just shows if you're persistent it can be done.

Hmmm ... Zeta Reticulii. Quite a famous (infamous??) nearby binary. Didn't see any U.A.S's ("UFO's") darting around it, did you?? You might also have been able to eavesdrop on Nancy Lieder and her conversations with the Zetas

See http://www.zetatalk.com/

and: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/12/23/08/pg1 :

Dear oh dear oh dear !!

Sorry, off topic rant finished -- congrats on a very good report much enjoyed.

Best,

Les D

Last edited by ngcles; 23-12-2008 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-12-2008, 05:38 PM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,875
Hi Coen

It's really inspirational to read your observing reports with a small low cost minimal aperture telescope. It's proof that you don't need a lot of aperture to see some really interesting stuff. With telescope aperture being so cheap these days its easy for people to forget that the other half of the observing equation aside from a telescope , is an inquisitive and informed mind and healthy imagination, an active `mind's eye' .

So many telescopes these days , of sizes the average amateur only dreamed of 30 years ago , gather dust because the owners can't supply these essential two ingredients..the keys to appreciating the observable Universe require much more than just handing over some cash to a discount telescope distributor

Cheers

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-12-2008, 05:48 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Hi Coen, Mark & All,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Satchmo View Post
Hi Coen,

It's really inspirational to read your observing reports with a small low cost minimal aperture telescope. It's proof that you don't need a lot of aperture to see some really interesting stuff. With telescope aperture being so cheap these days its easy for people to forget that the other half of the observing equation aside from a telescope , is an inquisitive and informed mind and healthy imagination, an active `mind's eye' .

So many telescopes these days , of sizes the average amateur only dreamed of 30 years ago , gather dust because the owners can't supply these essential two ingredients..the keys to appreciating the observable Universe require much more than just handing over some cash to a discount telescope distributor

Cheers

Mark
Hear, Hear !!!


Best wishes to all for the season!


Les D

Last edited by ngcles; 23-12-2008 at 06:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-12-2008, 08:58 AM
Coen
"Doc"

Coen is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 180
Thanks for the comments.

I am enjoying the scope and I certainly would love to get a larger one (kids are tired of me saying it .

Still the best scope is the one you use and the 70mm is set-up and easy to carry, great to use as a teaching aid too.

I had a cheap(?) 60mm refractor before that which I used for 20+ years until it eventually died - one too many trips to schools to show sunspots, moon, planets etc. Somewhere hidden in the shed is an 8" mirror blank that I had started to grind way back in high school.

The step up(!) from 60mm to 70mm, from 0.965" to 1.25" eyepieces etc is nice and good quality, relatively speaking, is cheap now.

I managed to revive the 60mm, mostly, and the kids use that as well as the 70mm. I liked the finder on the 60mm better (6x30) than the one that came with the 70mm (5x24) so moved that over. Means the colour coding is not the same but can't tell that in the dark

Enjoy your Christmas/New Year.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2009, 12:47 PM
goober's Avatar
goober (Doug)
No obs, raising Harrison

goober is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 795
Hi Coen,

Great reports - I use a 100mm refractor and love reading/writing obs reports (or used to - became a father on the 22nd of December and suddenly spare time is a thing of the past!). Keep it up - I'll be looking out for them!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2009, 10:14 PM
pgc hunter's Avatar
pgc hunter
Registered User

pgc hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Renmark, SA
Posts: 2,980
Hey Coen,
another nice little report mate, I'm enjoying them! Great to see you make the most of a small aperture scope!! Cheers and keep up the good work.

Goober,
Congratulations to you and your wife on your new bundle of joy!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement