Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-12-2016, 11:09 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Source of drift only in piggybacked refractor

I'm struggling to understand why I have so much drift when photographing using my piggybacked Megrez 90.

Mounted on a paramount ME the primary OTA (12" SCT) has no drift in 5 minute exposures and slight in 10 minute exposures. However the piggybacked Megrez has noticeable drift in 5 minutes and significant drift in 10 minutes.

The drift is mostly dec but not pure 100%, some RA.
The drift is ongoing not cyclical (the FOV shifts increasingly one direction)
The drift is there even when the primary OTA is autoguiding with good accuracy.
The drift appears to INCREASE over time from one exposure to the next, the stars become more and more illongated (see example attached).

Surely it has to be flexure if the primary OTA is known to be tracking OK? But how could it be so consistent and ongoing?

Confused.

Regards,
Roger.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_1415.jpg)
198.4 KB37 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_1414.jpg)
189.7 KB34 views
Click for full-size image (frame-1.jpg)
110.8 KB28 views
Click for full-size image (frame-2.jpg)
102.5 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (frame-3.jpg)
101.7 KB28 views
Click for full-size image (frame-4.jpg)
101.0 KB21 views
Click for full-size image (frame-5.jpg)
100.7 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2016, 11:50 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Check your polar alignment first obviously, I thought I was pretty good till I did my little exercise in rotating long exposures. No almost no guiding required and almost zero drift. Thread here if you're interested. My symptoms were identical to yours.

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=151186

The other factor could be balance of the mount/scope/counterweight. Do you rebalance when you change scopes over ?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2016, 12:02 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
Check your polar alignment first obviously, I thought I was pretty good till I did my little exercise in rotating long exposures. No almost no guiding required and almost zero drift. Thread here if you're interested. My symptoms were identical to yours.

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=151186
Polar alignment is good, 1.1 arc minutes off in Alt and Az. Also remember that the same exposure time in the primary scope has no drift when autoguiding, almost none when unguided, yet it's 2180mm focal length vs the piggyback refractor at 600mm. If it were polar alignment I would expect to see more exaggerated drift in the 2180mm not the other way around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
The other factor could be balance of the mount/scope/counterweight. Do you rebalance when you change scopes over ?
I never change the scopes over, as in, 6mo+ between any physical changes to the system at all, 4 years since I changed equipment/balance. I have checked the balance and it's OK. But,whether somethings is pulling on the refractor in some direction ..... maybe but can't see it .. must be, but still can't see it

Hmm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2016, 02:14 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
It looks very solidly piggybacked, so flexure of that magnitude seems
unlikely, so it would seem that something is moving. Could the weight of the camera and/or snagged/heavy cables be causing the focuser to sag a tiny bit. This movement would cease when the focuser tube came hard up against the casing or the locking screw[s], so it would be easy to check by doing an extremely long exposure, and seeing if the star elongation continued ad infinitum, or ceases after a given amount of time.
raymo

Last edited by raymo; 07-12-2016 at 02:14 PM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2016, 02:45 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
I'd say what you're experiencing is mirror flop. Now this is fine as you're off-axis guiding is correcting for it on your main OTA but as your secondary refractor doesn't suffer from this, it will show up as drift.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2016, 02:48 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I'd say what you're experiencing is mirror flop. Now this is fine as you're off-axis guiding is correcting for it on your main OTA but as your secondary refractor doesn't suffer from this, it will show up as drift.
Ohhhhh yes! You're probably right. The dodgy old 12" SCT bites my ass again. Grrr.

It certainly does have significant mirror flop, as you say not normally noticed.

Hmmmm, I guess if that is it, I"m either best not guiding, or ideally need to buy an OAG for the refractor.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2016, 03:43 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerg View Post
Ohhhhh yes! You're probably right. The dodgy old 12" SCT bites my ass again. Grrr.

It certainly does have significant mirror flop, as you say not normally noticed.

Hmmmm, I guess if that is it, I"m either best not guiding, or ideally need to buy an OAG for the refractor.
You'd probably be better getting a HEQ5 Pro and using it just on that The problem with mirror flop is that you can only image with one at a time (although you may be).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2016, 07:58 PM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rylstone, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,398
Roger,

Are you permanently set up? I would guess you are with an ME! So why not just use a good model + Protrack and forget about guiding all together? With a short FL scope going 5 min ought to be very easy. I can go 5 min without any problem with my TEC180/MEII.

Peter

PS. Are you trying to image with both scopes at the same time? There is a way but it's complicated and would necessitate using AO on one scope. I can post details if you mmight be interested.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2016, 08:15 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
You'd probably be better getting a HEQ5 Pro and using it just on that The problem with mirror flop is that you can only image with one at a time (although you may be).
I sometimes setup my GM8 in the observstory to allow dual use but it gets a bit squeezy Much easier to just keep it on the PME

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRejto View Post
Are you permanently set up? I would guess you are with an ME! So why not just use a good model + Protrack and forget about guiding all together? With a short FL scope going 5 min ought to be very easy. I can go 5 min without any problem with my TEC180/MEII.
Yes well normally I image through the 12" for 5min with no guiding, 90% of frames are good, and 600s with no guiding but becomes less reliable. Strangely I don't get any better with the 90mm refractor at 600mm FL. It's probably about time I did another model and improved the PEC, havne't touched it for a year plus, but I get lazy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PRejto View Post
PS. Are you trying to image with both scopes at the same time? There is a way but it's complicated and would necessitate using AO on one scope. I can post details if you mmight be interested.
I'm just doing one at a time. Tried two a while back but haven't since.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2016, 08:40 PM
Tony_ (Tony)
Registered User

Tony_ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 465
Regarding mirror flop - I always focus my SCT "uphill" (counterclockwise with Celestron scopes). That way it is already in the "flopped" position - never had an issue with mirror flop since then.

Tony.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-12-2016, 08:48 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_ View Post
Regarding mirror flop - I always focus my SCT "uphill" (counterclockwise with Celestron scopes). That way it is already in the "flopped" position - never had an issue with mirror flop since then.

Tony.
Mine is always focused using a motorised Crawford and the primary is in theory tensioned/locked, but I have measured the drift due to mirror flop in the past and while I can't remember exactly it was something like 5 arc minutes of drift.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-12-2016, 10:22 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRejto View Post
Roger,

Are you permanently set up? I would guess you are with an ME! So why not just use a good model + Protrack and forget about guiding all together? With a short FL scope going 5 min ought to be very easy. I can go 5 min without any problem with my TEC180/MEII.
Well, thanks for the inspiration to re-calibrate my setup Peter. I have done PEC and a new mapping run now. It hasn't changed much but has slightly improved my tracking accuracy. So .....

Unguided 600s exposures:
1 : Meade 12" prime focus
2 : Megrez 90 piggybacked

being unguided, there must be a whole bunch of movement somewhere in the megrez!!! it just keeps on drifting. Amazing. Going to have to hunt it down.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC_2070_1x1_300s_Clear_20161209_1602.00010609.jpg)
149.4 KB18 views
Click for full-size image (NGC_2070_1x1_600s_Clear_20161209_1456.00010608.jpg)
207.3 KB17 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement