Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-10-2018, 09:18 PM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
ieq 45 pro vs heq6r pro

hello everyone!

im considering to buy mount to the telescope esprit sky watcher 120 mm apo.

which mount is better? the ieq seems to be more precise and better but the heq6r pro seems to be more friendly and convenient user and the user interface looks more friendly... but i dont know... any thoughts about these two mounts to especially for astrophotography?

thanks!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-10-2018, 09:35 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
I was interested in an IEQ45 a while ago - techically it looks good from the perspective of the diameter of the worm wheels - was but decided against it because of lack of support here. Any issue and the cost of sending it back Is prohibitive. Basically what you may end up with is a useless pile of metal.

Secondly I’m not enamoured of the way the worm is engaged on the worm wheel, it’s a recipe for disaster ie teeth chewed off.

Instead I went with the AZEQ6 instead, as it has good local support and it was the highest payload version of the EQ6, since my scope is not light and has a very long focal length.

The AZEQ6 turned out to be fine for my scope (Santel MK91). Any of the EQ6 mounts will take yours just fine.

Last edited by Wavytone; 20-10-2018 at 09:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-2018, 09:42 PM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
wow! didnt expect to here about it on the ieq45 mount!
you think that the ieq45 pro will be better?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-2018, 10:03 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Go with an EQ6 mount. Forget iOptron as there is no support here. Anything does pear shaped it’s money down the gurgler.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-10-2018, 11:10 PM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
thank you very much! you really intrigued me!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-10-2018, 12:28 AM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
who said to you that the ieq45 is not a good mount?
people that owned that mount?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-10-2018, 07:32 AM
Lognic04's Avatar
Lognic04 (Logan)
Registered User

Lognic04 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 889
Yep, from what I've heard the ieq45 is a piece of crap - I spoke with someone yesterday that had that mount and he had nothing but trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-10-2018, 07:55 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
If you live in the USofA the iOptron support is apparently excellent.

I haven't used the latest version of the iEQ45 so cannot comment and don't want to rubbish something I have no experience with. As for the AZ-EQ6, I have had one for a couple of years and, though I only use it in AZ mode, I have had no problems with it other than it occasionally moving off the target after the GoTo has found it....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-10-2018, 01:46 PM
LewisM's Avatar
LewisM
Novichok test rabbit

LewisM is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere in the cosmos...
Posts: 10,388
My experience with iOptron was not positive. That was a few years ago now, so the newer systems probably are OK, but with only 1 or 2 dealers here, you may have trouble with any issues. I would caution buying an older/used iEQ45, as they are apparently not upgradeable to the new firmware/software.

SW mounts on the other hand have huge local support, and are generally excellent right out of the box.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-10-2018, 02:31 AM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
wow! thank you very much for this information! i think i will go with the sky watcher!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-10-2018, 10:44 PM
PhilTas (Phil)
Registered User

PhilTas is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Darwin
Posts: 190
I have an iEQ45 (early version), and can't fault it.
cheers Phil
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-10-2018, 03:31 AM
hubble2140
Registered User

hubble2140 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 40
sound great! thank you for this information
but i think that i still go with the heq6r pro although the good answers on the ieq45. it is sound that the heq6r pro is more stable...
thank you very much!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement