ICEINSPACE
Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waning Gibbous
99.2%
The Sun Now
Time Zones
Sydney*
7:26 pm
Perth
4:26 pm
Auckland*
9:26 pm
New York
3:26 am
Paris
9:26 am
GMT
8:26 am




  #1  
Old 15-09-2017, 01:56 PM
JoelRed (Joel)
Registered User

JoelRed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Palm Cove
Posts: 1
Nikon DX to FX upgrade for astro

Hi All,

In people's opinion, is a D810 or a D750 a worthwhile upgrade over the D7200 for landscape astrophotography?

I currently have a pretty good stable of lenses for the DX format and a move to FX would be pricey, but if there is a decent increase in quality then it's something I will do.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-09-2017, 07:41 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,853
APSc versus Full frame.

I did landscape astrophotography with a D800e. It was great. It also has a great time lapse function which I liked a lot.

In my case I have a Fuji XT2 (APSc) and Sony A7r2 (full frame). I always notice the extra light gathering of the full frame. Size does seem to matter but I don't think your APSc will hold you back from being able to get a great image.

Not sure about the high ISO performance of the D750. I would check that out. D810 has a superlative reputation and that Sony 36mp sensor is divine.

D850 would be the best but its also very expensive. I have seen some astro landscapes with it already and its a solid performer.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-09-2017, 10:26 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,777
As Greg says there is a difference between APS-C and Full Frame although it has nothing to do with the sensor size, it's all to do with pixel size.

I also have a Nikon D7200 which is a fantastic sensor BUT it does have smaller pixels than pretty much every FX sensor on the market. Let's take a comparison between a D7200 with a 24mm lens and a D810 with a 35mm which give a comparable FOV working from a 1.5x crop.

The D7200 has 3.91 micron pixels and the D810 has 4.88 micron pixels. This means that with a 24mm f/2.8 and a 35mm F/2.8 both wide open.
1) Same FOV
2) D810 has a 55% increase in pixel area for photon capture
3) D810 has higher resolution (28.75"/pixel vs 33.6"/pixel)

The D810 does this with 50% more pixels! So yes, a FX setup will outperform a DX setup if both sensors are good (they both are). Whether this is worth 5x the price tag is all up to you
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
astrophotography, d7200, d750, d810, nikon

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
SkyWatcher WiFi Adaptor
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
SkyWatcher 2018 Catalogue
Advertisement
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
Advertisement
Interest Free Finance
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement