#1  
Old 13-05-2012, 08:12 PM
matt42s (Matt)
Registered User

matt42s is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 9
Argon in the tube?

Has anyone ever tried filling their open tube with Argon? My RC8 is fairly airtight at the back end, with only a few gaps around the focuser. If I trickled argon into the tube, it should initially displace the humid Sydney air. Does anyone know how long it would take to become damp argon? or might it be a good solution to dew on my sensor?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-05-2012, 12:58 AM
Danack (Dan Ackroyd)
Registered User

Danack is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 125
I'm not sure if what you're trying to do could work, but Carbon Dioxide is denser, so more likely to stick around, cheaper and probably easier to get hold of.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-05-2012, 08:55 AM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
The surface between the argon and the air will be like the surf on Bondi and will reduce your seeing by about 2 points.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-05-2012, 08:49 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,951
Dry Nitrogen maybe, available through some tyre suppliers for high performance vehicles tyres rather than air.
Yeah, I know, air is 78% Nitrogen anyway but dry and no oxygen is the supposed benefit in racing tyres so they say. It would be minimal 'boiling' at the interface but temp difference may be a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-05-2012, 10:11 AM
mplanet62's Avatar
mplanet62 (Michael)
Registered User

mplanet62 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 86
Dry nitrogen is the way. Argon will get out fast - it's lighter than air and floats up. Carbon dioxide is corrosive in combination with water vapor (omnipresent). I do not know your telescope design, but if the tube opens to atmosphere even briefly all exercise would have no use.
Correction: Argon is heavier than air -my bad. Does not change the situation to better, though...

Last edited by mplanet62; 21-05-2012 at 10:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement