ICEINSPACE
Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waning Gibbous
98.1%
The Sun Now
Time Zones
Sydney*
5:46 am
Perth
2:46 am
Auckland*
7:46 am
New York
1:46 pm
Paris
7:46 pm
GMT
6:46 pm




  #21  
Old 01-12-2018, 07:30 AM
Marke's Avatar
Marke (Mark)
Registered User

Marke is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Well, I have to say I was amazed to see a FWHM of 1.36"....but have no doubts about the mechanical rigidity. I've never experienced meridian flip issues etc....the task now is to get some quality data

Hummm M42 is up!



Indeed. Tiny changes. As for the GSO....Really? I've not experienced that problem.
Yep every time you loosen or tighten the push pull screws there is a little bit of shift , I've had it on both my RCs
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-12-2018, 07:50 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,777
That FWHM map is a thing of beauty Peter!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-12-2018, 10:11 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hinchinbrook
Posts: 17,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Hummm M42 is up!
That could be interesting, see how many stars you can get in the trap with multiple sort exposures.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-12-2018, 10:18 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 6,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That could be interesting, see how many stars you can get in the trap with multiple sort exposures.
Perhaps I should take bets?

But have to say Im very chuffed to see things work as advertised.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 17-12-2018, 05:39 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Not pain Paul, more puzzlement. I am very happy with the data out to the edge of the 16803...with FWHMs under 1.9 arc sec.

I think Atmos is correct...CCDinspector is not perfect. I can literally change the focus 10 steps (about 1/1000th) in the same location and it gives me a different result.....as to why? A mystery so far.
I found CCD Inspector to give slightly variable results. Mostly the same but yeah sometimes it would shift and you hadn't done anything. I think its good for an overall close collimation but eyepiece on a night of good seeing is the go for that final tweak.


Perhaps CCD Inspector is simply being influenced by seeing when you are getting that close. I know my CDK on a night of poor seeing is unable to be focused. That must affect CCDinspector calculations. I presume its using FWHM calculations to tell.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 25-12-2018, 06:01 PM
PRejto's Avatar
PRejto (Peter)
Registered User

PRejto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,264
Peter,

It's great that you arrived at a terrific result. I read through the link to your website and test results and was surprised that your final use of CCDI was based on a ten min exposure. Seems to me that there would be too many variables in such an exposure...tracking, atmosphere, etc. When I use CCDI I take ten x 10 sec exposures and let CCDI average them. I find these results to be quite repeatable. Anyway, probably you do this and I missed it somewhere.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 27-12-2018, 08:23 AM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,340
Hi Peter,

Thanks for sharing this! As you you see from a separate thread having progressed on from a Newtonian, I am going through a learning curve with collimating CDK type scopes myself.

At the moment, using a Newtonian laser, my secondary appears centered, but the field is not, and I am getting very slight elongated stars as per your website blog.

In addition to what you have described, just a question - would simply using the secondary to find the centre of the field first and then the primary to remove any elongations also work as a technique as well?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Interest Free Finance
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
SkyWatcher 2018 Catalogue
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
Advertisement
SkyWatcher WiFi Adaptor
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement