#1  
Old 25-08-2018, 12:59 PM
iborg's Avatar
iborg (Philip)
Registered User

iborg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lynbrook, Australia
Posts: 305
Celestron 80AZ or 100AZ

Hi All


I know someone who recently bought the 80AZ, it seems to be nice simple scope to use, and gives reasonable views.


He has the opportunity to swap it (plus a little cash) for the 100AZ.


He is asking for my advice (the mad fool!) and I am very much in two minds about it.


It should provide a brighter view, but, less magnifcation with the eyepieces (and a barlow will be obtained regardless).


Does it have more chromatic aberation? I am having trouble finding reviews.


Any thoughts on your experience with either of these would be appreciated.


Thank you


Philip
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-08-2018, 02:30 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 4,876
At last a question that has a definitive answer. Stick with the 80AZ; less
CA, as you mentioned, and better value for money. The longer focal length of the 80 will give superior views with the budget eyepieces that come with these budget scopes.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-08-2018, 10:39 PM
iborg's Avatar
iborg (Philip)
Registered User

iborg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lynbrook, Australia
Posts: 305
Hi Raymo


Thanks for the advice, I shall pass on your words of wisdom!


Philip
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-08-2018, 11:39 AM
Tropo-Bob (Bob)
Registered User

Tropo-Bob is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cairns
Posts: 834
In theory, I would agree with the advice given.

However, having owned both scopes, I found the 100mm (F5) to be far more useful. I found the lens in the 80mm (F5) to perform poorly with soft images, whereas the 100mm had sharper images.

I could not get rid of the 80mm fast enough. Then again, that was 10+ years ago, so maybe they have improved since or maybe I had a dud.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-08-2018, 12:58 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 4,876
Bob, the latest iteration of the 100mm gets poor to very poor reviews of its optics everywhere I've looked, with one reviewer even saying his was only any good for the moon. The 80 gets quite good reviews; probably similar quality optics, but works better at around f/11.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-08-2018, 01:50 PM
Tropo-Bob (Bob)
Registered User

Tropo-Bob is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cairns
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
Bob, the latest iteration of the 100mm gets poor to very poor reviews of its optics everywhere I've looked, with one reviewer even saying his was only any good for the moon. The 80 gets quite good reviews; probably similar quality optics, but works better at around f/11.
raymo
Sorry, I jumped in thinking that this was about F5 scopes. So I defer to you, Raymo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-08-2018, 09:52 PM
iborg's Avatar
iborg (Philip)
Registered User

iborg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lynbrook, Australia
Posts: 305
Hi All


Thanks again for the info, looks like he will stay with the 80.


Philip
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Meade Australia
Advertisement
Celestron Australia
Advertisement
SkyWatcher Australia
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement