Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-12-2019, 01:24 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
Betelgeuse at it's faintest for 25 years!

An interesting time to be practising "Spectroscopy 101"
Report states:

Currently this is the faintest the star has been during our 25+ years of continuous monitoring and 50 years of photoelectric V-band observations. The light variations are complicated and arise from pulsations as well from the waxing and waning of large super-granules on the star's convective surface.

http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=13341
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-12-2019, 05:18 AM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
Visually it appears also faint to me, I just saw it barely brighter than Bellatrix.
Upcoming supernova ? Probably not in our lifetimes.


When it does happen, it should look like this (when supernova, the temperature is much higher so it will appear blue) with Uluru on the foreground.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (betelgeuse3.jpg)
177.4 KB137 views

Last edited by skysurfer; 25-12-2019 at 06:55 AM. Reason: Added image
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-12-2019, 08:41 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Hi Ken & All,

Yes it has been interesting to follow -- when the sky is clear enough. For the last six weeks here it has either been smoke or dust. Often sufficient to obscure all stars down to second magnitude.

I did get a chance to finally get a look with a relatively clear sky on 22nd December at about 2.30am. My estimate was magnitude +1.3 -- the faintest certainly I've ever seen it. It was notably fainter than Aldebaran, (+0.9) (but variable) and a bit fainter that Pollux (+1.14) and a bit brighter than Bellatrix (+1.62).

Tonight the comparison stars were Adhara (Epsilon Canis Majoris +1.53) and Bellatrix (+1.62) and it was brighter than both these and I arrived at a similar magnitude for Betelgeuse (+1.3). The sky is still somewhat smoke affected but these three stars are all about the same height above the horizon and so, similarly affected by haze.

Recent (about a week old) photometric measures from different observatories have yielded: V = +1.273, +1.294 and +1.286. This is the faintest it has ever been photometrically measured.

The current thinking is this dip in brightness is a superimposition of two different minima within two of Betelgeuse's roughly cyclic pulsations -- 495 days and 2100 days. Call it a resonant super-dip if you like.

The latest update is in ATel #13365 that reads:

As reported earlier in ATel #13341, the luminous red supergiant (a core-collapse SN II progenitor) Betelgeuse (alpha Ori) has become unusually faint with a V ~+1.125 mag (measured on 2019 December 07.25 UT). Since that report Betelgeuse has continued to decrease further in brightness. The most recent measurements made on 2019 December 19.3 UT, 20.2 UT and 22.25 UT are V = +1.273, +1.294 and +1.286 mag, respectively. This appears to be the faintest the star has been measured since photoelectric observations have been carried out of the star. However, photoelectric photometry carried out during late-1926 / early-1927 by Joel Stebbins (1931: Pub. Washburn Obs., 15, 177) indicates that Betelgeuse declined to Vā€™ ~+1.25 mag. At its average maximum brightness light (V ~ 0.3 - 0.4 mag), Betelgeuse is the 6 - 7th brightest star. But by 2019 mid-December the star has slipped to the ~21st brightest star. The red supergiant is now closer in brightness to Bellatrix (V =+1.64 mag) than to Rigel (V =+0.13 mag). Wing three-band Near-IR and TiO photometry carried out at Wasatonic Observatory shows that Betelgeuse is also cooler with an inferred spectral-type near ~M3.5 Iab (Teff ~ 3,545 K from TiO-photometry). This is about 150 K cooler than measured near maximum light. Analysis of the last 25-yrs of V-band and Wing TiO and Near-IR photometry shows a dominant ~425+/-10 day period as well as a long-term ~5.9+/-0.5 year period. The current faintness of Betelgeuse appears to arise from the coincidence of the star being near the minimum light of the ~5.9-yr light-cycle as well as near, the deeper than usual, minimum of the ~425-d period. We plan to continue to monitor the star. If the star continues to follow above periods, light minimum should occur soon. But this needs to be checked. This continues to be an opportune time to carry out complementary measures of Betelgeuse while it is in its current low state and is unusually cool and faint.



For those of you hoping for an imminent core-collapse supernova, you're probably going to be disappointed -- a mundane explanation is more likely. One to keep an eye on certainly so we can gain a better understanding of the late evolution of high-mass stars.

Best,

L.

Last edited by ngcles; 25-12-2019 at 11:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-12-2019, 06:36 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
Here a CNN article:


https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/26/w...rnd/index.html


But I don't expect an explosion in our lifetimes.


And I have my doubts about the 'red giant' nature. Well, probably I am saying nonsense, but it is just a theory.

Eta Carinae also appears red, but it is actually a very hot bluish star, but duct clouds around Eta make it red, just like the bushfire smoke makes the Sun appear red in NSW.
In this not also the case with Betelgeuse, that it is actally a hot Rigel like star embedded in a shroud of dust ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-12-2019, 08:40 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Hi All,

For those still interested in the Betelgeuse ... thang, under a somewhat smoke affected sky, not completely dark (very deep twilight) to my eye it has dipped a bit further and is now no better than marginally brighter than Bellatrix (Gamma Orionis) -- magnitude +1.62. It seems equally bright to me as Epsilon Canis Majoris (Adhara) -- magnitude +1.53. Estimate of magnitude +1.4 to +1.5.

Betelgeuse and the two other stars were approximately similar in altitude and therefore should be equally affected by the smoke-haze.

Best,

L.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-12-2019, 10:01 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Our ABC published an article about Betelgeuse magnitude variations yesterday.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-...ode3f/11828624
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Betelgeuse variations in magnitude.jpg)
57.7 KB74 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-12-2019, 01:11 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
Our ABC published an article about Betelgeuse magnitude variations yesterday.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-...ode3f/11828624
Thanks Bill. I saw that earlier and was going to repost the same chart from Dr Stella Kafka, I think.

It is quite interesting when you look at the variation over say some 30 years of data mostly varying in Magnitude between 0.2 and 1, with infrequent outliers as high as nearly 0 and as low as 1.3 (now-ish), and the very consistent period of one year.

EDIT: given the one year periodicity I'd be interested to know if the maxima/minima were in any way related to our orbital parameters/ position around The Sun and whether it coincided with perihelion / aphelion or .... ?

EDIT #2:OK I just checked ROUGHLY from the graph data (and using a bit of visual interpolation over the years) which shows minimum apparent intensity around the start of each calender year, the same time as closest solar approach: perihelion, or close enough. Who Knows, perhaps it's something on the star itself (logically more likely) rather than something "in between" that accounts for the one year period in the intensity / magnitude data?



Best
JA

Last edited by JA; 28-12-2019 at 01:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-12-2019, 06:55 PM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
The embedded video is indeed spectacular.


Interesting ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by abc.net.au
Can I see Betelgeuse?

Yes, you can see Orion and Betelgeuse in almost all of Australia.

Betelgeuse is so close to the equator (7 degrees North) that it is visible from all over the world except most of Antarctica. In the regions above the polar circle in summer, it is daylight 24/7 inhibiting seeing the star with the naked eye.


But Australia lies between 12 and 43 S (Tasmania included) which allows viewing the star everywhere, so what 'almost' means I don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-12-2019, 12:54 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
They would have to be allowing for Australia's holdings in Antarctica.

According to Google :-
Eighty years ago Australia received from Great Britain its largest ever gift: six million square kilometres of Antarctica. Three years later it became the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT). 42% of the Antarctic continent is Australia's.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-12-2019, 09:32 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysurfer View Post
Here a CNN article:


https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/26/w...rnd/index.html


But I don't expect an explosion in our lifetimes.


And I have my doubts about the 'red giant' nature. Well, probably I am saying nonsense, but it is just a theory.

Eta Carinae also appears red, but it is actually a very hot bluish star, but duct clouds around Eta make it red, just like the bushfire smoke makes the Sun appear red in NSW.
In this not also the case with Betelgeuse, that it is actally a hot Rigel like star embedded in a shroud of dust ?

The spectrum of eta Car and Betelgeuse are very different. The red colour is not from the same thing. The 2 images below are of the 2 stars.
The Betelgeuse spectrum is not mine as I have not taken a low resolution image. It shows that the stars spectrum is predominately in the red with strong absorption features and hence a cool star.

The eta Car is mine from some years ago. It shows very strong Ha emission that makes it look red as well as lots of other emission lines.

Bushfire smoke will not create the same thing. It will just filter out the blue end of the spectrum generally and not cause absorption lines.
Cheers
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_etacar_20120610_435Labelled.png)
16.6 KB50 views
Click for full-size image (betelgeuse_20191228_890_Leadbeater_MILES.png)
40.6 KB43 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-01-2020, 08:30 PM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,662
As I stepped outside tonight and looked at Orion, I thought Betelgeuse was slightly fainter than Bellatrix. Last observation was a week ago and it was the opposite then. Took a quick picture and the camera still sees Betelgeuse a little brighter but not by much.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-01-2020, 08:00 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,932
Orion from 1967.... taken from balcony of our flat in Zagreb...
On this image, Betelgeuse is brighter than Rigel (film was EFKE 20DIN, panchromatic...)
Camera was SMENA8....
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (1967_03_17_Orion_2_s.jpg)
176.8 KB80 views
Click for full-size image (1967_03_17_Orion_s.jpg)
118.7 KB69 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-01-2020, 06:15 AM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan View Post
Orion from 1967.... taken from balcony of our flat in Zagreb...
On this image, Betelgeuse is brighter than Rigel (film was EFKE 20DIN, panchromatic...)
Camera was SMENA8....
Nice images. Certainly a big difference in brightness. What was the sky like in general, light pollution wise? Is that the Milky way upper left?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-01-2020, 06:31 AM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,932
Mirko,

Light pollution there was bad even then, so Milky way was not visible from that location.

I took them whn I bought that camera (my second one :-) )...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-01-2020, 09:11 AM
JohnF (John)
Registered User

JohnF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Nimbin NSW Australia
Posts: 265
In ancient times Betelgeuse was yellow, not Red. Quoting Wikipedia:--

"By contrast, three centuries before Ptolemy, Chinese astronomers observed Betelgeuse as having a yellow coloration."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-01-2020, 11:23 AM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnF View Post
In ancient times Betelgeuse was yellow, not Red. Quoting Wikipedia:--

"By contrast, three centuries before Ptolemy, Chinese astronomers observed Betelgeuse as having a yellow coloration."
I suspect the idea of what is a "red" star has shifted more since these observations than B's actual spectrum. I too would not consider B's colour red if I saw it anywhere else. If I ordered tomato soup and it came in that colour, I'd return it. The carbon star in Crux, now that's red.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-01-2020, 11:27 AM
JohnF (John)
Registered User

JohnF is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Nimbin NSW Australia
Posts: 265
I did read somewhere that 50 stars just disappeared, that is these Stars just went out as if a light switch switched them off leaving no trace of these.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-01-2020, 12:03 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 6,932
John,

"Yellow" Betelgeuse is probably just perception.. BTW, some people are partly colour blind ( protanomaly, see here) , and what they may see as "yellow" could be more red to the rest.. In science, we want confirmation of claims from couple of sources... if there is only one source, it could be considered as not reliable.

BTW, couple of thousand of years is very short time in evolution of stars... that applies even to short-lived supergiants, like Betelgeuse),

So far Betelgeuse seems to be at the end of it's red supergiant phase.. which may last hundreds of thousand of years - so it is very unlikely it was yellow giant 2 thousands years ago. But, if this is actually the case (some people are currently working on such models), that means there will be no fireworks any time soon :-)

And, stars do not just dissapear.. so those 50 missing that you are mentioning are most likely still there (or someone just wrote a fake news somewhere).
Or there is much more to it than just dissaperance.
If a star explodes as supernova, it will be much fainter (in visible light that is) that progenitor once the fireworks is over..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-01-2020, 02:09 PM
N1 (Mirko)
Registered User

N1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,662
Ishihara says I'm probably not colour blind, and I say Betelgeuse is probably not red (orange, maybe)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29-01-2020, 07:00 AM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 52N 6E (EU)
Posts: 1,152
I just saw that "Faintelgeuse" is not brighter than Bellatrix anymore.
I am curious how it will develop in the upcoming weeks.
But a supernova within our lifetimes is highly unlikely.


About the "yellow" Betelgeuse : actually the star *is* yellow, because the temperature and hence color is the same as a incandescent halogen bulb (3000 K). But because it is faint compared to much closer terrestal lights it appears 'red' to our eyes.
When you are a few kilometers from a 3000 K lamp (can also be a warm white LED), or even only a few hundred meters from small warm white garden decoration LEDs, it appears as red as Betelgeuse (or Antares or whatever M class star).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement