Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-08-2017, 06:30 PM
toc's Avatar
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 826
If only imaging, why do we need a secondary?

Lets say I don't care about visual astronomy - What would happen if we took a newtonian design, and replaced the secondary with a camera? I guess the tube will be a bit longer...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-08-2017, 06:43 PM
dimithri86 (Dimithri)
Registered User

dimithri86 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hornsby
Posts: 141
You can do that. An example would be hyperstar.

Check out the link below
http://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/...-Teleskop.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-08-2017, 06:50 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,051
Sure, it works on my Edge HD8, remove the secondary and attach the Hyperstar lense to the front. You camera the becomes the central obstruction, and you lose focal length. A small round camera like a ASI works well, and its the reason for tube cameras.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-08-2017, 08:02 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
On top of all that, Hyperstar is waaaayyy faster than a newt...I think a C8 HS is f/2.2, C11 HS f/2.0
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-08-2017, 02:20 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
There are some disadvantages for replacing the secondary with a camera
(thinking of a newt here)

Hiding the cables to the camera,

Extra weight of a coma corrector and spacer installed would mean a stronger spider needed,

Coming up with a method for adjusting the tilt and collimation of the camera,

Coming up with a focusing method

Locked into OSC (you could swap one filter at a time with a mono, but then run the risk of dropping a filter onto the primary, in the dark)

No OAG, which means a guide scope for guiding and probable flexure issues

Personally I think you back yourself into a corner doing this method (converting a newt).

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-08-2017, 03:39 PM
toc's Avatar
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
There are some disadvantages for replacing the secondary with a camera
(thinking of a newt here)

Hiding the cables to the camera,

Extra weight of a coma corrector and spacer installed would mean a stronger spider needed,

Coming up with a method for adjusting the tilt and collimation of the camera,

Coming up with a focusing method

Locked into OSC (you could swap one filter at a time with a mono, but then run the risk of dropping a filter onto the primary, in the dark)

No OAG, which means a guide scope for guiding and probable flexure issues

Personally I think you back yourself into a corner doing this method (converting a newt).

Bill
Well yeah, i guess that all makes sense given the size of a cam and filterwheel, it is a fairly pointless activity.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-08-2017, 06:49 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,657
The secondary only angles the image to a accessible spot so there would not be much advantage gained, on a newt anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement