#1  
Old 16-11-2015, 10:52 AM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,253
Lodestar X2 vs Original Lodestar

Hi folks,

I picked up a 2nd hand Lodestar X2 last week. http://www.sxccd.com/lodestar-x2-autoguider

Thought I'd test it's upgraded sensitivity by comparing it to my Original Lodestar.

Have to say I was underwhelmed by the result. From the photos here the original (first image) appears to be more sensitive!

Has anyone else experienced this?
Do I maybe need to update drivers or something? (I use a mac)

Thoughts?

Cheers

Andy
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Original.jpg)
193.6 KB91 views
Click for full-size image (X2.jpg)
182.9 KB82 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-11-2015, 11:15 AM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
phd/phd2 automatically scales the screen display based on the signal - so you cannot tell much about sensor performance by looking at the screen. SNR on the same star should give you an indication of the performance improvement (which is claimed to be about a factor of 2x).

Last edited by Shiraz; 17-11-2015 at 02:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-11-2015, 05:21 AM
Eden's Avatar
Eden (Brett)
Registered Rambler

Eden is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 399
The Lodestar x2 has fewer hot pixels than the original as well as higher sensitivity at near-infrared wavelengths.

A more detailed comparison can be seen here:

http://www.astrosurf.com/comolli/strum60.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-11-2015, 11:58 AM
phomer (Paul)
Registered User

phomer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maribyrnong
Posts: 158
Andy,

I have some thoughts and suggestions.

1) Upgrade your guiding software to PHD2 as this also shows the signal to noise ratio of the guide star. It also has a number of other options that make it well worthwhile.

2) It is not clear from your screen shots which is which, however, I can see far more stars in the first image.

3) As someone else pointed out the program will adjust the display so that what you are seeing may not reflect what the program is seeing and the brighter stars are going to look similar.

4) The extra sensitivity is only going to be significant when you move to longer focal lengths and you are imaging in an area with few if any bright stars suitable for guiding.

Regards

Paul


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01 View Post
Hi folks,

I picked up a 2nd hand Lodestar X2 last week. http://www.sxccd.com/lodestar-x2-autoguider

Thought I'd test it's upgraded sensitivity by comparing it to my Original Lodestar.

Have to say I was underwhelmed by the result. From the photos here the original (first image) appears to be more sensitive!

Has anyone else experienced this?
Do I maybe need to update drivers or something? (I use a mac)

Thoughts?

Cheers

Andy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement