#1  
Old 02-09-2015, 10:56 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
Motorised Focus Step Size

Attached my new RoboFocuser to my telescope this evening to calculate how large each step size is. Just as a rough figure I have come up with ~5.2 microns per step.
This is connected to the 1:1 end of the focuser, doesn't fit onto the 10:1 end without getting a new adapter with one end having to be 1/4 of the size of the other.

The Critical Focus Zone on my telescope with the reducer should be ~85 microns which gives ~13-14 steps within focus. In my mind having end 5 steps within focus should be fine but what seems logical in my mind doesn't always relate very well to the real world haha

So putting it out to all you experienced automated astro-imagers, is having ~14 steps within focus fine or should I bite the bullet and push that down to 130-140? To myself it seems a bit like overkill but it isn't something that I have ever played around with
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2015, 06:41 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Tunnel Vision

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,801
13-14 steps should be plenty in my opinion...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2015, 06:50 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
I'd recommend a micro focuser, not coupling it on a 1:1 shaft.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2015, 05:18 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
I'd recommend a micro focuser, not coupling it on a 1:1 shaft.
I had you in the back of my mind when you mentioned that to someone else a while back. Right now it is just a matte of whether it'll work fine without having to buy another part
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2015, 05:23 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
I had you in the back of my mind when you mentioned that to someone else a while back. Right now it is just a matte of whether it'll work fine without having to buy another part
I had some torque issues on a 1:1 rack and pinion. Another consideration is how much backlash you have and if 14 steps is enough to deal with it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-09-2015, 10:23 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
if you have enough torque without the 10:1 (as Marc notes), 14 steps should be plenty - the actual cfz is determined by the seeing more than the scope in many circumstances, so it is probably wider than the calculated value anyway. I also have seen advice suggesting that hundreds of steps in the cfz is good, but can't for the life of me understand why.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-09-2015, 08:08 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
I also have seen advice suggesting that hundreds of steps in the cfz is good, but can't for the life of me understand why.
Maybe better sampling? Also more leg room to compensate for mechanical issues, slippage, backlash, etc... and the piece of mind that if your focuser barrel seizes in the cold the 10:1 shaft will slip in the three ball bearing and you won't strip the smallest cog of your motor gearbox.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement