Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 14-06-2017, 05:43 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,452
Hi Mike

Had much fun on the bus doing blink comparisons. Detail is outstanding and it's a very very cool PN. Top job
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 14-06-2017, 05:53 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Love the comparison with the AAT shot. It's getting to the the point where you look twice to see if an image is amateur or Hubble... Extraordinary!!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 14-06-2017, 09:00 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT View Post
Hi Mike

Had much fun on the bus doing blink comparisons. Detail is outstanding and it's a very very cool PN. Top job
Cheers Dave, glad my images can be so entertaining

Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
Love the comparison with the AAT shot. It's getting to the the point where you look twice to see if an image is amateur or Hubble... Extraordinary!!
It's amazing huh? If someone had said to me in 1993, that in two decades time, I would be able to take an image better than David Malin could with the AAT... with a 12" scope ...I would have just laughed

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 15-06-2017, 08:29 AM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,088
That is superb stuff, Mike. I think it is better than the big scope, has more detail.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 15-06-2017, 08:41 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
That is superb stuff, Mike. I think it is better than the big scope, has more detail.
Cheers Bart...bah! who needs a 4m telescope anyway

Mike

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement