#1  
Old 20-09-2018, 05:26 PM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
Newt or refractor

What is better for imaging with a dslr ( for now ), a newtonian reflector say 8 inch or an 80mm refractor? Would like to hear opinions.
Cheers
Karl
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-09-2018, 05:38 PM
ChrisV's Avatar
ChrisV (Chris)
Registered User

ChrisV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,737
Easy to answer. I've got both !


80mm refractor is easier though ... shorter focal length (my refractor and newt are 470 and 1000mm) and less fiddle with the refractor. No collimation and quick to set up. More time to worry about other things that go wrong !!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-09-2018, 05:49 PM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
Thanks for that Chris. Does the refractor handle a barlow well with imaging
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-09-2018, 05:49 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Start with the refractor for imaging, everyone must have an ED80 somewhere? Use the newt for visual. When you are ready for some punishment, grab a cheap f/4 newt and image with that....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-09-2018, 06:43 PM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
I've got a f5 Newt now
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-09-2018, 10:11 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlzburg View Post
I've got a f5 Newt now
Use what you have. There is a learning curve with imaging, and a lot of it has to do with processing. Most folks start with a DSLR. Btw, not all newts are setup for imaging, if it is a visual Newt the camera may not reach focus. An imaging newt is preferred as they are designed for camera focal lengths, and usually require extension tubes to focus some eye pieces if used visually.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-09-2018, 07:23 AM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
I add the t- mount and with a 1 1/4 inch tube thingo and put into the focuser and focus is great. If I want to visual I need a 55mm extension tube.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-09-2018, 07:59 AM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 4,979
I too say start with what you have. Don't worry about corrector this or flattner that. Get going and the learning curve will address everything in time and turn. You have a little Vixen Newt that is made for imaging - GREAT! You won't gain anything more or less than with a refractor. Ok, there's collimation, but big deal! It is easy to solve

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-09-2018, 08:05 AM
speach's Avatar
speach (Simon)
Registered User

speach is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wonthaggi Vic
Posts: 625
If I had the cash I go for 150mm refactor
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-09-2018, 02:50 PM
silv's Avatar
silv (Annette)
Registered User

silv is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany 54°N
Posts: 1,110
This Field-of-View-calculator could factor into the decision, too.
https://astronomy.tools/calculators/field_of_view/

F5 newt from as small as 130/150mm upwards is great for DSO. The EQ-mount has to be stable enough to support the weight. With newts you get more mm per kg than with refractors.
Tube and focusser need to be able to handle the weight of you camera, as well, so I'd rather not buy a cheap 80mm refractor if you plan to dangle a heavy Canon from its end.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-09-2018, 03:54 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlzburg View Post
I've got a f5 Newt now
Simple decision then. Use the F5 Newt. It will probably flog any smaller refractor anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-09-2018, 11:53 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Following on from Kevin's remark, here's a single frame of 40secs taken
with my 8"SW f/5 Newt on HEQ5, unguided, Canon 1100D. Try that with an 80mm refractor.
It's not a quality image, but it shows what you can get with just a single shortish exposure with an 8" scope.
Best viewed at about 75% screen.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (5189 bar + Eta Car 002 single frame down.jpg)
222.7 KB41 views

Last edited by raymo; 22-09-2018 at 12:05 AM. Reason: more text
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-09-2018, 06:51 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 5,990
I totally agree with Raymo and Kevin as well
I have a 6” f6 Bintel GSO reflector on a HEQ5 mount unguided
and have captured some great images this year with up to 60 second exposures
I’m using my wife’s old stock canon 600D no adapters needed reaches focus perfectly
Here’s my single image of Eta Carinae Nebula ISO1600 with a 60 sec exposure
By the way my 6” newt only cost me $299
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (04F70A7A-AB63-44F7-BECF-C583DD48AD67.jpg)
164.4 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-09-2018, 07:28 AM
Karlzburg (Karl)
No moon for you!!

Karlzburg is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Posts: 330
Thank you all for the advice. I had the Newt out the other night and sorted out the camera and focusing with it. A single shot at Alpha Cent was crystal clear, I couldn't see any coma at the edges
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-09-2018, 05:29 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
Hi Karl
I love my 80mm but the eight inch is all over it really...in my opinion.

The 80 mm is easy to handle etc etc but bang for the buck you cant go past the eight.

I went f5 over a f4 and I think such a choice is forgiving.

I have not adjusted the eight yet, I keep meaning too but it is acceptable for me at the moment.

And although I went with a coma corrector first up I am not sure that I needed it.

I am trying to set up the zwo now...and just realised the optical train has no coma corrector...so it will be interesting to see how that goes.

Five hundred for a big newt or two grand for a 80 mm ...start with the newt.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23-09-2018, 07:39 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Sorry for the minor hijack, but Alex you'll find a significant improvement
with a coma corrector.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24-09-2018, 10:55 AM
jimmyh1555 (James)
jimmyh1555

jimmyh1555 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: George Town TAS
Posts: 156
What's the difference between a big Newt or a small refractor? I find the smaller one is easier to set up, and doesn't vibrate so much in wind. Do you have to take longer exposures with a small refractor? An 8 inch Newt has 7 times the light-gathering power of a 3 inch refractor - does that mean you have to have 7 times the exposure with the smaller scope
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 24-09-2018, 11:47 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyh1555 View Post
What's the difference between a big Newt or a small refractor? I find the smaller one is easier to set up, and doesn't vibrate so much in wind. Do you have to take longer exposures with a small refractor? An 8 inch Newt has 7 times the light-gathering power of a 3 inch refractor - does that mean you have to have 7 times the exposure with the smaller scope
With that 7 times, you also have to factor in focal length. The big Newt gives you more focal length and a fast F ratio. Focal ratio is what it's all about. Focal ratio = focal length / diameter of the objective. Your typical ED80 has 80mm objective with 600mm focal length. So 600 / 80 = F7.5. A typical 8" F5 is 1000mm FL / 200 (diameter) = F5. So the big fat Newt has both a longer focal length AND a faster F ratio.

If we even it out and make the focal length of the ED80 1000mm, the same as the 8" F5 Newt, the ED80 would have a focal ratio of F12.5. Which is very slow photographically.

Bottom line, DSLR's like fast scopes, up to about F7. You can get away with slower focal ratios but you have to acquire enormous amounts of capture time to make up for it.

On the other hand, yes a little ED80 is so much easier to handle with vibration, tracking and wind etc. It's much more forgiving in that respect.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 24-09-2018, 11:02 PM
jimmyh1555 (James)
jimmyh1555

jimmyh1555 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: George Town TAS
Posts: 156
I actually have a 100mm Esprit f5.5, a Bintel 200mm Newt f4 and a XLT 150mm refractor f5
I am using the XLT150 and Bintel 200mm for planets with barlow, and Moon. This is because I can set them up on tripod with clock drive and exposures are all video files - very short exposures, so no problem with tracking.
For DSO's using a few long exposures (ie 30 - 90sec so far) I am using my concreted-in pier with HEQ5 Pro and 100mm Esprit with corrector. Unguided at moment, but experimenting with Synguider 2 .
Would there be any advantage in putting the Bintel 200mm f4 on the pier for DSO?
My cameras are all ZWO 224 or 183 colour. No DSLR. Advantage being imaging time, I guess, or will I get better resolution (crisper photos) with the Esprit?
Maybe the 150mm refractor will be better than the Esprit 100 as it is bigger?
DECISIONS.....DECISIONS AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHH
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 25-09-2018, 06:06 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyh1555 View Post
Would there be any advantage in putting the Bintel 200mm f4 on the pier for DSO?
My cameras are all ZWO 224 or 183 colour. No DSLR. Advantage being imaging time, I guess, or will I get better resolution (crisper photos) with the Esprit?
There should be.... but.... if you search/read in the forums about fast newts and imaging you'll get a taste for the trials that await with collimation/tilt/flexure and collimation. Did I mention collimation? When the fast newts sing, they are brilliant and quick. Getting them singing is tricky.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement