Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Astrophotography and Imaging Equipment and Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-11-2012, 06:34 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,468
Experiences with Lodestar Autoguider or equivelant?

Hi guys,

I am trying to guide a 12.5" f/5 telescope (1600mm FL) and Canon 400D with a short focus 80mm f3.7 refractor.

Although I have a Skynix 2.0 camera which I use for planetary, and I have tried using Metaguide to guide with it, I have been unsucessful. As such, I have now reverted to PHD and an SPC900 webcam.

However as you can guess, the SPC900 is really very limiting in terms of accuracy and ability to actually find guidstars. I appears that other for really bright star areas such as M42, I am not able to get the accuracy I am seeking in 3-5 mins exposures. As such, I am now in the market for a super dopper guiding camera.

Reading all the threads I can see that the Starlight Lodestar is way up there in performance and price!!

Just wanting to know feedback on using Lodestar with PHD and a short focus refractor compared to other guide cameras as I am trying to justify the $700 price tag for a guide camera which is more than double than what I would like to spend.

My buying criteria is ability to use with PHD and find guidestars without a hassle and accuracy at 1600mm FL when guiding with a short focus 80mm diameter 300mm FL guidescope (which can be beefed up with a 2 x barlow off cource).

Look forward to everyone's advice.

Clear skies.

John K.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-11-2012, 06:46 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
John,
Not sure my experience is what you're looking for...
I used a QHY5 on my C9.25 (at f10) using a beamsplitter - PHD and Al's reticle to guide a spectroscope. This requires hold the target star image on a 25 micron slt indefinately.
It worked very well on the brighter stars, the moving to the Lodestar has allowed me to go even deeper...far more sensitivity.
It works 100% with PHD (and Al's reticle!) and hopefully will keep me happy for the next few years.
Highly recommended.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-11-2012, 07:46 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
The lodestar is a great camera. Highly recommended. I used the Orion guide camera previously and sometimes had trouble getting a guidestar. With A lodestar and my 4"refractor using an OAG there is always a guidestar. If you are using a guidescope(with consequent large field of view) you'll never lack for a good guidestar
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-11-2012, 01:10 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Meru has been borrowing mine, so he might give some advice as a new user.

From my point of view I could never go back to anything else. Never had a problem getting a solid guide or finding a guidestar, and that was on a C9.25 with an OAG.

Highly recommended, and sensitive enough to us an OAG and get rid of guidescope issues.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-11-2012, 04:03 PM
DavidTrap's Avatar
DavidTrap (David)
Really just a beginner

DavidTrap is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,032
What the others have already said - far superior to an Orion SSAG or QHY5.

DT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-11-2012, 04:47 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,468
Thanks for the comments and advice Gents.

This is what Terry Platt from Starlight Express advised as well:

"Many thanks for considering our Lodestar guider. It is extremely popular
and gives excellent guiding with PHD etc. You should get very good results when guiding with a 300mm FL guidescope, as the algorithms use sub-pixel accuracy. My only reservation is that our 'SuperStar' has smaller pixels and might be slightly more precise, although a little less sensitive."

The other alternative is the SBIG STi. I just wonder how it would compare. It uses a KAI 340 Kodak chip that is 7.4 microns square and 648 x 484 and appears to also allow darks to be subtracted etc.

...mmmmm...decision time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-11-2012, 04:53 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
John,
PHD will do darks and dark corrections for you with the Lodestar...or am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-11-2012, 05:25 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
John,
PHD will do darks and dark corrections for you with the Lodestar...or am I missing something?

Yeah agree, that's a given, not a major issue, only if in the future I stop using PHD for some reason.

From reading all the threads on the net, the issue now in my mind appears to be more about build quality on the Lodestar. Dont really want to end up with a unit with loose connectors or a chip that has lines through it. Loadstar defenitely appears to be more sensetive that Sti, but with an 80mm 300mm FL guiding a 12.5" F/5 will that matter anynow?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-11-2012, 06:54 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
John,
I use the TS coupler to "lock" the cables on the Lodestar. Works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-11-2012, 07:38 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
I'm using the Lodestar and can highly recommend it too. I always have at least several guide stars to choose from no matter where I point the scope. You will not be disappointed.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-11-2012, 08:18 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,275
hello john even though i have no experience with any other guide camera, the lodestar amazes me!
i chose it because from most peoples opinion it is the best and i am not in the least techno savy and did not want to regret spending $400 hard earned on a cam that was more hit and miss
i downloaded phd and i have trouble free guiding!
the price on lodestar in oz is at the mo is equivalent if not better than the US at $650 AUS
my lodestar works brilliantly at 1750fl and a 500mm fl guidescope (see avatar)
pat
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-11-2012, 10:33 AM
Visionoz's Avatar
Visionoz (Bill)
Registered User

Visionoz is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 717
Quote:
Originally Posted by John K View Post

... Dont really want to end up with a unit with loose connectors or a chip that has lines through it. Loadstar defenitely appears to be more sensetive that Sti, but with an 80mm 300mm FL guiding a 12.5" F/5 will that matter anynow?
Hi John

Be aware that you will find quite a bit of hot pixels/lines with the Lodestar since it is not cooled - anyway most of the guiding softwares do allow you to take darks which will give you a "clean" screen to work with and it is very sensitive, like what others have said you get a chance to pick out guide stars always

HTH
Cheers
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-11-2012, 01:01 PM
srchadwi (Steve)
Registered User

srchadwi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 20
Lodestar guider

Hi John

I frequently use it in an OAG with a 3000mm scope so I'm effectively guiding at 3000mm. I've never once had a problem finding a guide star, never needing to go beyond 3 seconds exposure and even at the barest points in the sky.

Best purchase I ever made in terms of guiding.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-11-2012, 08:14 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,789
I can't comment about the lodestar but do have an STi. It is also very sensitive and has the advantage of an inbuilt shutter for darks. This is why I chose it over the lodestar when I decided on what guider to get for my spectrograph.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-11-2012, 12:22 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,468
Thanks for the comments everyone.

Defenitely leaning towards a Lodestar and will be buying locally so that if any faulty CCD/Cable issues etc. arise I can pretty much guarantee it will be going back to the place of purchase for refund/replacement.

Seems that there have been some units out with questionable quality of some sort, but as high sensetivity is what I am seeking then Lodestar looks like the way to go. Will keep everyone posted on progress and unlikely to receive anything before Xmas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
John,
I use the TS coupler to "lock" the cables on the Lodestar. Works very well.
Thanks for this - where can this be purchased? I know that a European dealer is also selling something like this:
http://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/...onnectors.html
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23-11-2012, 12:37 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,904
John,
Yes, that's the one from Telescope Service. I bought mine while in Belgium....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24-11-2012, 11:09 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,602
I have a Lodestar - it works very well - has never let me down.

see here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/2471943...in/photostream

I had an Orion SSAG & it was hopeless when used with an OAG.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 25-11-2012, 12:18 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
You might also like to have a look at the SBIG ST-I. Class 1 chip, shutter for true darks and very very sensitive with a small foot print. Love mine, has never let me down.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 25-11-2012, 07:49 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17,877
It seems Lodestar and STi are the 2 hot guiders at present.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30-11-2012, 10:31 AM
Grimmeister's Avatar
Grimmeister (Anthony)
Registered User

Grimmeister is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 188
LodeStar

Hi John,

I have recently purchased the LodeStar camera as I was using an Orion SSAG for guiding and GStar EX as en electronic finder, I have only had a chance to get first light on it last night due to the weather here in Brisbane but I have to say that I am very pleased with it.

I used to run guiding at 1.0 second exposures on the SSAG in order to see suitable guide stars but am able to run the LodeStar at 0.1 seconds and still see very faint stars, this has significantly reduced some of my egg shaped stars in long exposures (10 minutes).

I use the LodeStar on a 70MM WO Zenith Star scope and can see the nebulasity of Orion even at 0.1 seconds exposure .

I havent used the software that it ships with yet as I haven't had a chance to read the manual to see how it all works but it works flawlessly with PHD. I believe you can also image with these cameras using the Starlight software and am keen to give this a try.

In summary well worth the money.

Cheers

Anthony
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement