ICEINSPACE
Most Read Articles
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON Waxing Crescent
30.9%
The Sun Now
Time Zones
Sydney*
8:54 pm
Perth
5:54 pm
Auckland*
10:54 pm
New York
4:54 am
Paris
10:54 am
GMT
9:54 am




  #1  
Old 06-12-2018, 06:12 AM
RichardJ (Richard)
Registered User

RichardJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carlingford
Posts: 658
Best current Canon DSLR for astroimaging

Interested in hearing what astroimagers think is the best current unmodded Canon DSLR for deep sky imaging and night scapes.

RichardJ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2018, 06:24 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie, NSW
Posts: 4,840
Does it have to be a Canon? I have owned a few Canon's, including a modded and cooled one. My Nikon D5300 is better imho.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2018, 07:50 AM
RichardJ (Richard)
Registered User

RichardJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carlingford
Posts: 658
Thanks for your reply Glen.
I am specifically interested in Canon cameras.

Richard.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2018, 09:07 PM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 952
Canon 5D Mark4 is pretty darn good, if you can handle the cost. The sensor isn't as good as the Sony sensors (or of course the Nikon sensor in the D850) but it's respectable. The 80D is a decent APS-c sensor. The original 6D is still not a bad choice.

I'm with Glen, even my Nikon D5100 from 11 years ago gives most Canon APS-c cameras a hiding.

Hope that helps,
Cam
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2018, 09:21 PM
that_guy's Avatar
that_guy (Tony)
Local Korean Millennial

that_guy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 1,840
A bit biased but if you can find a good low shutter count 5d mk ii second hand, it has excellent colour and is built like a truck. Very affordable.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2018, 08:58 AM
Astrofriend's Avatar
Astrofriend (Lars)
Registered User

Astrofriend is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 122
I'm very happy with my Canon 6D. You find used ones cheap today.

Earlier DSLR cameras that I have/had:

Canon 350D
Canon 5D
Canon 40D
Canon 6D

None of them has been modified.

/Lars

Last edited by Astrofriend; 11-12-2018 at 11:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2018, 06:08 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 408
According to Roger Clark in the US from clarkvision.com the Canon 7D mark 11 is the best DSLR for astrophotography as it has low noise and good hydrogen alpha response ( for both standalone on tripod or through a telescope at prime focus )
The only drawback it weighs 950grams very heavy
My current 10 year old Canon 600D only weighs 590 grams
Hope this helps
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2018, 06:23 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 8,972
+1 for the 6D Mk1. An added bonus is that the 6D has wifi. From memory you can trigger via an app & Wifi

I doubt the 7DII is as good as that sensor is nowhere near as good in low light. (I have both)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2018, 07:43 PM
JA
Registered User

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,176
If it has to be Canon, then I'd agree that the 6D would be the best choice and only slightly bested by the considerably more expensive 5D mkIV: however; if you open the field to other contenders I would suggest Nikon D600, 610,800,810, Sony A7r3 or in APSC , Fuji has some models with very good hydrogen alpha response (around 43% transmission !!!! compared with most other brands in the 20 to 25% range. That's a huge difference) the only downside with the earlier Fuji cameras like the Pro 1 & the X-e1 is their lack of tethering ability; however as a standalone in the field it could be OK

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-12-2018, 03:31 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,350
Agree with most of the above, an original 6D is a capable camera, streets ahead of the 18MP APS-C Canons of the time with respect to noise, and as they’ve been on the market a few years you might find one at a good price.

I’d be curious about the current crop of 24MP APS-C Canons, that sensor appears roughly in the same ballpark as its competitors in many respects. Would like to try one for astro.

But for size and weight, the Fujifilm X-series are hard to beat, especially at the promotional pricing that (seemingly frequently) comes around. It’s mostly intervalometer territory though, as only the high end models tether to a computer I have two of the bargain basement models and they’re excellent daytime stills cameras, with better than average Ha response after dark.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-12-2018, 06:36 PM
RichardJ (Richard)
Registered User

RichardJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Carlingford
Posts: 658
Thanks everyone for your input.

I think I will go with the Canon 6D original.

RichardJ
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-12-2018, 11:23 PM
Astrofriend's Avatar
Astrofriend (Lars)
Registered User

Astrofriend is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 122
Hi,
Now I remember that I have collected a lot of links about camera tests and reviews related to astronomy.

You find them here:
http://www.astrofriend.eu/links/link...erareview.html

Maybe to some help.

/Lars
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Yesterday, 06:52 PM
JA
Registered User

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelopardalis View Post
I’d be curious about the current crop of 24MP APS-C Canons, that sensor appears roughly in the same ballpark as its competitors in many respects. Would like to try one for astro.
Hi D,

Seeing that you mentioned it, I too was curious, so here are 3 new Canon APS-c cameras (7DMkII, M50 and the Rebel 7(2000D)) and a Fuji XT20 Compared (Similar for XE3 and not much different for XE2 or XE1)
for noise at high iso (3200). I usually compare at this ISO not because I would necessarily use the camera at that high an ISO sensitivity, more that it will accentuate any differences. The noise downscales at lower ISO values, but the comparative differences between the cameras remain the same.

Sometimes (this time too) the differences in the fine detail and noise in the background black are muted somewhat by the JPEG upload to IIS. To compare small differences it is best to check these comparisons live on dpreview to see the maximum detail.

Best
JA
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (New Canon APSc Sensors & Fuji.jpg)
143.8 KB13 views

Last edited by JA; Yesterday at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
SkyWatcher WiFi Adaptor
Advertisement
Atik Horizon
Advertisement
SkyWatcher 2018 Catalogue
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
OzScopes Authorised Dealer
Advertisement
FLI Cameras and Imaging Accessories
Advertisement
Interest Free Finance
Advertisement
Lunatico Astronomical
Advertisement
NexDome Observatories
Advertisement
Astronomy and Electronics Centre
Advertisement