#1  
Old 22-04-2019, 08:57 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,042
While the Moons Up ..........

Captured a few lunar images a few nights ago of a 95% waxing moon with my new 8” f5 for the first time with BYEOS planetary mode
1/ Prime focus
2/ 2 x Powermate
3/ 2.5 x Powermate
4/ 4 x Powermate

The crater Tyco being the centre feature

Stacked in Autostakkert 3
Sharpened in Registax 6

In retrospect my old 6” f6 newt is better for lunar images , the 8” has a bit to much aperture and focal length

Cheers
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (9363C83C-A15D-49F4-B258-D9AADF7CB4EC.jpeg)
145.6 KB39 views
Click for full-size image (BB5419A4-3280-467F-9387-3BC420C8A101.jpeg)
150.5 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (2F230680-B5EC-4A08-BBDC-6701FB328C9C.jpeg)
142.8 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (C49C7334-9704-40E9-8AB9-A9160197BDF0.jpeg)
67.5 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-04-2019, 09:54 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Martin, the reasons you give for prefering your 6" f/6 don't make sense to me, the extra 11% of focal length doesn't stop you getting the whole moon in the
frame, so what is the disadvantage? You can't have too much aperture for
lunar work, the greater the aperture the more magnification you can use if you wish, but more importantly, the smaller the details that can be resolved.
Win win situation.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-04-2019, 10:27 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,042
Raymo
Maybe seeing conditions could be the difference but the 6” f6 works well with my Canon 600D at 5 x zoom on BYEOS which produces almost 1:1 pixel resolution
On the 8” f5 with 5 x zoom on BYEOS the images appear not as sharp especially using the Televue powermates ( maybe to much magnification for the seeing conditions )
Lots of variables but you do get a feel for your scopes after a while and so far the 6” seems better
Maybe the next night I use the 8” on the moon things maybe different
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-04-2019, 12:13 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Martin, To produce fine lunar images you don't need BYEOS, or need to worry
about pixel ratios, or introduce anything else that takes away from the simplicity of what you are doing. You can't beat the laws of physics; your 8 should out perform your 6, just as my 10 out performed my 8. I assume that you have checked your 8's collimation. On nights of really good seeing you don't even need video, or to stack still images. Some of my best lunar shots
have been single frames.
I hope you don't mind my commenting on your images, but the two smaller
scale ones are over sharpened and over contrasted, so that the moon doesn't
look real. I have posted a correctly processed image for comparison.
Hope it helps.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (astronomy 2 002 down.jpg)
170.7 KB21 views

Last edited by raymo; 23-04-2019 at 12:13 AM. Reason: more text
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-04-2019, 07:12 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,042
Thanks Raymo
I don’t mind any comments at all , that’s why we post images
Yes I’ve been taking single lunar images on 6” for a few years now
Here’s a couple from last year
I used video “lucky imaging” on the 8” to see how they would end up, I’m always experimenting with things

Cheers
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (7C006F8E-5801-4E3A-BA6A-1C79C50F0909.jpeg)
175.9 KB10 views
Click for full-size image (B4A483F1-F8DF-43BC-A3B8-C18A9E138275.jpeg)
194.0 KB10 views
Click for full-size image (6B65EFB9-593D-4E0A-8C17-D1D9488D9DCD.jpeg)
197.5 KB14 views
Click for full-size image (270B45FE-2B2C-498F-A00C-C2FED12EABDF.jpeg)
190.9 KB14 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-04-2019, 11:58 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Much more natural looking.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-04-2019, 12:54 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,042
Yes agreed
These were the best of a batch I took during last winter when the moon was up higher than now
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-04-2019, 07:06 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,915
Nice captures Martin.
Try a six inch app on the eigth inch.
I used to do similar and it seemed to work.
Alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement