ANZAC Day
Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-08-2009, 01:47 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
How deep is this image..?

Be interested to know if anyone with a good star atlas program can add a few more magnitude labels to this image:

http://upload.pbase.com/strongmanmik...53840/original

Cheers

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-08-2009, 08:45 AM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Are you trying to out do Hubble?
Deep as !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-08-2009, 09:15 AM
seanliddelow's Avatar
seanliddelow (Sean)
Astro-Addict

seanliddelow is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 633
Wikisky will show you the mag of galaxies up to 15-20.
Just find the same patch of sky.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-08-2009, 10:14 AM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanliddelow View Post
Wikisky will show you the mag of galaxies up to 15-20.
Just find the same patch of sky.
Sean, for curiousity, tried Wikisky.
Very useful resource. Nice interface and images.
I like the fact you can drag the maps to centre at a specific point.

Mike, great picture.
Didn't recognise the galaxies at first then realised you've featured two of the Grus Quartet.

Regards, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-08-2009, 12:41 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
I have a fairly good eye for telling magnitudes....I'd say the faintest blobs you have in there are down around +20 to +22, but best to checkout with a very good atlas. Wikisky doesn't go deep enough....there's blobs in Mike's piccie which don't show up on the Wikisky section of that part of the sky.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-08-2009, 06:42 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Mike, great effort, but sorry, you can't do useful magnitude estimates with processed RGB data.

The drill is the usual reduction (dark+bias/flat) of a calibrated BVR or I into the photometry package of your choice.

Mira and MaximCCD both do splendid jobs. Reference star magnitudes can usually be found via an image link with TheSky or similar. With a calibrated image you can then use known values to measure the unknowns.

My guess with a 6" scope and a KAF11002 will deliver around mag 19.5...very hard to go deeper....but not impossible.

P.S.
I have done many asteroid curves using the same chip and a 14.25" scope. Typically 10 minute subs. The data becomes a little useless
below mag 20.

Last edited by Peter Ward; 21-08-2009 at 06:46 PM. Reason: additional info
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-08-2009, 07:49 PM
seanliddelow's Avatar
seanliddelow (Sean)
Astro-Addict

seanliddelow is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
I have a fairly good eye for telling magnitudes....I'd say the faintest blobs you have in there are down around +20 to +22, but best to checkout with a very good atlas. Wikisky doesn't go deep enough....there's blobs in Mike's piccie which don't show up on the Wikisky section of that part of the sky.
Probably because it was a dss image. This image looks like it was a sloan digital sky survey image...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-08-2009, 08:41 PM
CometGuy's Avatar
CometGuy
Registered User

CometGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 942
Mike,

I converted your full size image to grey-scale, saved it as a fits file and ran it through Astrometrica. According to it you are detecting stars to mag 20.5 V, not bad for a 6" scope!

Terry
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-08-2009, 09:53 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by CometGuy View Post
Mike,

I converted your full size image to grey-scale, saved it as a fits file and ran it through Astrometrica. According to it you are detecting stars to mag 20.5 V, not bad for a 6" scope!

Terry
How did you correct for non-linear scaling? The posted data is only 8 bit/channel .jpg You *need* a calibrated 16bit (data) frame to make a determination such as this.

Last edited by Peter Ward; 21-08-2009 at 10:00 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-08-2009, 10:28 PM
CometGuy's Avatar
CometGuy
Registered User

CometGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 942
I just matched the star field in astrometrica, and used the magnitudes given by USNO B1.0 for the matched stars. For example the following crop from Mikes largest image shows a couple of mag 20 stars. The "Vmagnitude" value was estimated using R and B values from the USNO catalogue.

Terry
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mikes.jpg)
29.4 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-08-2009, 10:31 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by CometGuy View Post
........ The "Vmagnitude" value was estimated using R and B values from the USNO catalogue.

Terry
You missed the point.

The data has been scaled.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-08-2009, 10:33 PM
CometGuy's Avatar
CometGuy
Registered User

CometGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 942
Yes but I didn't measure data from the image.

T
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-08-2009, 10:52 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by CometGuy View Post
Yes but I didn't measure data from the image.

T
No you didn't.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-08-2009, 12:26 AM
CometGuy's Avatar
CometGuy
Registered User

CometGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 942
Mike,

This is a very useful freeby program - Aladin - I use it often:

http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/java/nph-...me=downloading

Download the file, run it and type NGC7590 in the "command" window. This will centre the screen on NGC7590, from the "File" menu you can load as many catalogs and survey image overlays as you want (there are 100's available). For stars I would choose the USNO B1.0 catalog as it goes all the way down to mag 21.

Terry
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25-08-2009, 01:29 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,176
Cheers Terry, thanks heaps

Mag 20.5 huh? cool not bad for a 6" scope from a semi dark sky I guess?

I will check that program out.

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement