Beautiful Paul. The stars at the edges look excellent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
… The pic you've presented looks like many stars are flat topped mountains maybe due to reaching the well depth. They should be pointy conical shaped little mountains. …
|
We think Allan means "Gaussian in profile". A conical profile would be very abnormal.
Although it is true that filling the quantum wells can produce flat-topped stellar profiles that look a bit like fuzzy-edge sequins, for us the biggest cause of flat-topped stellar profiles is trying to demonstrate, in a single 8 bit image, the bright stars in the core and also the faintest features in the corners, such as the half-dozen or more galaxies that you've captured. The process of applying a nonlinear stretch in order to make the super-faint features visible causes an extreme loss of contrast between brightest and almost-as-bright features. That is not the fault of the optics; it is not the fault of the camera chip or the exposure duration; it is not even the fault of the human doing the processing once the decision has been made to show the faint stuff.
The engineers at work used to say, "Price, Features, Time to Market, pick any two." The same applies to processing an image like this. "Bright detail, faint detail, truthful relationship between them. Pick any two."
We'd say that you've done a superb job. And the scope is working superbly.
Best,
Mike and Trish