#521  
Old 16-01-2012, 09:50 AM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenc View Post
The very faint tail in Lester's image is about 22 degrees long, the "brightest" part is about 5 degrees.
The greenish Vela SN remnant is visible on the lower left side of the image.
Hi Glen - I make it out to 43 deg and more than probably extending out of frame, 45 deg + (per link below). The Milky Way interferes right near the edge of the frame, a bit hard to tell.
http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/w...illengthsm.jpg

Interesting, how do you all estimate lengths? I use the measuring tool in Starry Night. Should be very accurate as it's pretty simple maths - angle subtended at centre by two points on a sphere.

Clouds interfered last night so I got nothing. Great job again Lester!

Cheers -
Reply With Quote
  #522  
Old 16-01-2012, 10:45 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Top work again Rob. It would be interesting to know how long the tail is in KMS. No wonder it is fading quickly, the ice-cream is nearly finished.

Thanks for your input too Glen.

Nice image Steve, looking forward to the processed version.

Thanks Liz for your comments also.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #523  
Old 16-01-2012, 12:34 PM
swannies1983 (Dan)
Registered User

swannies1983 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 781
People are still imaging Lovejoy? Talk about dedication. Well done guys
Reply With Quote
  #524  
Old 16-01-2012, 12:39 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Thanks Dan, it keeps me off of the streets at night and from getting into trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #525  
Old 17-01-2012, 01:35 AM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,161
Despite great dark skies tonight and imaging deeper than I have before, I could only trace the tail to about 5 degrees past Nu Puppis, or 34 degrees in total (subs centred on 11:52 UT, 16 Jan). Canon 400D, 18mm, 5x and 4x 3.5 min, ISO 1600, F/3.5.

Very, very faint trace at that, and not even as far as the Milky Way. I shot two fields covering from the LMC to way past Procyon just in case there was a hint of anything on the other side of the Milky Way. That's about it for me on C/2011 W3, it's continuing to fade and I've pushed my humble gear to the limit.

I've been in touch with Lester and he decided to do an extra night, same objective in imaging across the Milky Way. He'll have more conclusive results than me, but we'll just have to wait to see what he got.

Cheers -
Reply With Quote
  #526  
Old 17-01-2012, 02:02 AM
pixelsaurus's Avatar
pixelsaurus (Mike)
Registered User

pixelsaurus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Te Kuiti,NZ
Posts: 166
I had a squizz about 2 hours ago with 20X80's and not able to see any trace of Lovejoy. Moon was low in the east but sky clear, LMC and SMC easily visible.
Reply With Quote
  #527  
Old 17-01-2012, 02:16 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,280
Rob, Lester, all,

becoming a real challenge now from LP Adelaide skies.

tonight's 30sec x 100 frame set, QHY8/lens

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (16Jan2012_pos_titled_c.jpg)
172.9 KB64 views
Click for full-size image (16Jan2012_neg_titled_c.jpg)
172.1 KB54 views
Reply With Quote
  #528  
Old 17-01-2012, 05:10 AM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
I went to say good bye to Lovejoy on January 14th.
The Comet was accross the LMC tail extending up to Canopus.
Invisible to the naked eye or binos but ok to the Camera (barely)

Stack of 10x60s at ISO1600 14mm:
http://www.luisargerich.com/lovejoy/h297dc105

Stack of 50x60s at ISO1600 50mm:
http://www.luisargerich.com/lovejoy/h297dc105#h76abb75

Same with Inverted Color:
http://www.luisargerich.com/lovejoy/h297dc105#h18fd4bd2

I could have masked the LMC a little before stretching but well itīs about the comet isnīt it?

Luis
Reply With Quote
  #529  
Old 17-01-2012, 06:49 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Top stuff again Rob, to get the tail out to 33 degrees is still Very long. I shot at 1600 ISO with 4 minute exposures last night and 24mm lens at F2. Could see the tail on the rear view screen of the camera to well past Canopus. Did 3 Fov across to Sirius, but like you couldn't detect the tail near the MW.

Yes it is very faint, your inverted images Steve and Luis show the tail well. Mike, IMO any Moon, or stray light/pollution will make viewing the comet a no show. 80mm aperture binoculars should be a chance in dark skies, but the 20x magnification my yield too small a FOV to really show the comet. I have noticed on my images a very small scale shows the extent of the tail best.

All the best.

ps hope to have my image of last nights shoot up this evening.
Reply With Quote
  #530  
Old 17-01-2012, 04:38 PM
Ian Cooper
Registered User

Ian Cooper is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Posts: 126
Great stuff Luigi, Lester & Rob.

It looked like being a stunner of a night at sunset last night (16th) but bands of visible cirrus scrolled across the sky parallel to the line of the comet's tail. I could trace it well in my 10 x 50 bino's, but proximity to the LMC meant I couldn't say for sure either way if I could see it with the unaided-eye.

Did some shots with my newly acquired 450D but I had a few technical issues I hope to have the chance to remedy tonight. My widest field currently is on my old Nikon F film camera. I took a couple of 15 minute exposures on some Fuji Superia 1600 that has been sitting in the fridge since McNaught was in the sky five years ago! Checked out the film package and found out it was the official film for the FIFA World Cup in Germany, 2006! I'll do a few more tonight and then process it tomorrow. I'll keep you posted on how it all comes out.

Cheers

Coops
Reply With Quote
  #531  
Old 17-01-2012, 04:42 PM
Ian Cooper
Registered User

Ian Cooper is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Posts: 126
addendum to my last post, I could trace the tail for 7 degrees in my 10 x 50 bino's.

Coops
Reply With Quote
  #532  
Old 17-01-2012, 06:03 PM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,161
Nice shots Steve, Luis! Look forward to yours, Lester & Ian.

Anyway, here's my shot from last night, nothing much to see, my last on the comet I'm afraid:
http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/w...2012textsm.jpg

Cheers -

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #533  
Old 17-01-2012, 07:45 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Good work again Rob, to trace the tail for that length still makes it Some comet IMO.

Ian, top job on tracing the tail in the binoculars, I got not doubt that some parts of New Zealand have the best skies going around for darkness.

All the best.

ps. stacking my images from last night now, will take about 2 hours for 3 sets of FOVs.
Reply With Quote
  #534  
Old 17-01-2012, 08:59 PM
Ian Cooper
Registered User

Ian Cooper is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Posts: 126
Hi Lester and all,

it is a pity that the anti-cyclone over us has developed a 2nd centre because the one still out in the Tasman has dragged some useless cumulus over us now that it has cooled down. Never mind.

My mate Stephen Chadwick stacked my first lot of 6 x 5 minute exposures with my 450D from last night. I hadn't perfected the focussing, and didn't tighten up the tracking so I was hoping to correct all that tonight.

It was set on 35mm @ f/4, 1600 ISO. The negative shot shows more of the tail than I could see with the bino's.

Cheers

Coops.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2012.01.16 450D 35mm f4 6x5mins 1600 ISO b.jpg)
155.6 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (2012.01.16 450D 35mm f4 6x5mins 1600 ISO negative b.jpg)
196.9 KB39 views
Reply With Quote
  #535  
Old 17-01-2012, 10:05 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Looks good Ian. I tried gradient mapper on this image, but didn't show as much as the inverted style. For some unknown reason DSS has had a hard time stacking my images tonight, with 2 FVOs having to be redone, at an hour each. This image below was the 2nd FOV captured last night showing the tail passing above Canopus.

3 x 4 minutes at ISO 1600 with 24mm lens at F2.

http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/u...s/34924def.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #536  
Old 17-01-2012, 10:50 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Eventually got 2 FOV merged together.

http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/u...s/b4f68b33.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #537  
Old 18-01-2012, 06:59 AM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester View Post
Eventually got 2 FOV merged together.

http://i638.photobucket.com/albums/u...s/b4f68b33.jpg
This one looks really good Lester. Crystal clear comet. And now it's getting really difficult to image but it's a nice way to say good bye
Reply With Quote
  #538  
Old 19-01-2012, 12:42 AM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,161
Nice job Ian, Lester! Clear night tonight and I decided to give it one more go. Quite pleased with the result, appears to show the tail to around 32 degrees length. There is the vaguest hint of a continuation to the Milky Way but I think it's star alignments leading the eye in, as on the 16th. Details on pic:
http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/w...fulltextsm.jpg

Here's the normally processed version, with the tail barely visible:
http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/w...-34UTredsm.jpg

Cheers -
Reply With Quote
  #539  
Old 19-01-2012, 05:29 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,318
Thanks Rob, the tail is very faint and very long.
Reply With Quote
  #540  
Old 19-01-2012, 06:28 AM
Ian Cooper
Registered User

Ian Cooper is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand
Posts: 126
Tuesday Night 14 degrees of tail in Bino's!

Well after having written the night off it promptly cleared. The 1600 ISO film didn't deliver the goods. I would have been better off stciking with the more recent Fuji Superia X-tra 400 which I still have plenty of.

On top of that, after spending a good amount of time getting the focussing right on my Canon 450D I maust have knocked it before my first actual comet shot because the focus had popped.

The real sucess for the night, in fact the only sucess, was the view through my 10 x 50 Nikon's. Transparency was 8/10 and meant that I could trace the tail for two bino fields, about 14 degrees in all.

I'm heading over the mountains to our annual Stardate convention this weekend and hope to have another chance to check it out from there. As well I will be catching up with everyone and chewing over comet tales for those of us who actually saw it, some of my old mates from the top half of the North Island didn't get to see Lovejoy at all, so good has been their summer!

Cheers

Coops
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement