Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-02-2019, 11:36 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Oriyawn

16 X 90 secs 35mm at f/4.5[slow kit lens] ISO 1600. Nano Tracker. Only target available last night, all the others were closed for the night.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (orion again 35 down down.jpg)
200.5 KB61 views

Last edited by raymo; 07-02-2019 at 12:09 AM. Reason: wrong image
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2019, 12:38 AM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Great to see an image taken without showing tens of thousands of £s worth of gear, gives non imagers like me hope

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2019, 01:07 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Hi Jeremy, Yes, simple can work. I used to have all the gear, but being in my 80s it all became hard work; this set up weighs 2.5kg all up, so I can be up and running in 5 minutes, and pick it up and run[ha ha] indoors if it starts to rain.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2019, 07:15 AM
mynameiscd's Avatar
mynameiscd (Andy)
Registered User

mynameiscd is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Langkoop, Victoria
Posts: 457
Great shot Raymo,
Like Jeremy said its great that you can get fantastic images without having to spend up big.
Im pretty lucky by getting 2nd hand equipment i havent had to fork out too much but i do like the weight thing and the setup, packup time you have.
My setup only cost me about 1500
Scope 250
Camera 350
Mount 750
Acc 150
Aready had a 19 year old laptop with xp on it using free software.
But it's what you do with that equipment that counts. Just beacause people can spend 1000s, it doesnt help with composition and very subtle processing which you certainly have got in your images.
No yawning here.
Keep those stunning images coming.
Cheers
Andy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2019, 08:31 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,918
I love your photos Raymo.
I hope the yawns are from tiredness and not a sign that you are getting board as your photos are somewhat inspiratuonal and I hope you dont get tired of doing them...You certainly offer encouragement not only to new folk but remind some who like me get involved with a more complicated approach the beauty of wide field and what can be achieved with a dslr and its lenses.
Your photos have reminded me just how much I like wide field.
Keep them coming.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2019, 08:56 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
I never tire of seeing pictures of constellations and starry expanses.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2019, 12:07 PM
ChrisV's Avatar
ChrisV (Chris)
Registered User

ChrisV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,738
Really nice Raymo.

I've just had a go at oriyawn, but with a 135mm lens. Just got to sort through the cloudy subs from last night and process. I'm getting into this imaging with a camera lens. As you say its nice - portable and easy to set up using my modded EQ5.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2019, 07:27 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks for the kind words everybody.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-02-2019, 07:44 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,042
Raymo

A belated reply , another nice wide field image
Can’t wait to eventually see some winter clusters and nebs with your great little set up
Down the track when I can longer handle medium sized mounts and newts, your images tell me to get a nano tracker and good camera / lens set up

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2019, 09:45 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Cheers Martin. I think the ideal when things get a bit too much, would be a
tracker one size up from the Nano, which would allow you to use a small
scope, say 60 or 70mm.
ray
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-02-2019, 11:42 PM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,441
I Nanoed on Monday night. 3 x 95 seconds 800iso with a 50mm lens. I'm in an orange zone so I chucked on a broadband filter to bring out the Ha and reduce the light pollution. Had to crop out the trees so it's not the full frame. Yes, they're quick and easy. I was going to get more serious earlier but unpredicted clouds arrived, so I didn't bother. An hour or two later, no clouds! What do you do not to waste time before going to bed? Bring out the Nano Tracker! Set up, start shooting, pack up in less than an hour. Way to go!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (CarinaCrop.jpg)
172.1 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2019, 12:43 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Yes, they are so convenient. Did you notice my single frame of the same area as your image that I posted the other night? My 600D is noticeably poorer
at picking up Ha than my 1100D was; bummer!
raymo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement