Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-08-2019, 08:18 PM
RussellH
Registered User

RussellH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunny Queensland
Posts: 172
NGC5128 - First image for feedback

Hi All,

Finally after over a month since I started to collect AP gear, I finally have a picture to post. I'm just testing still at the moment to get the workflow in hand. This is a single frame out of my Canon 450D on a Skywatcher f5 6" Newtonian. It's a 3 minute sub that was simple converted to PNG and downsized so I can post. No processing has been done.

I'm still waiting to install my focuser, so this was a rough hand focus using liveview on the camera back.

So, with those caveats, how does it look? Any suggestions on what I need to do to improve my captures? I'm currently running 20 3-minutes subs. I don't have anything to capture flats just yet, and I'm not sure if I need darks & bias as I've seen conflicting reports on whether they are needed these days or not?

Also attached is my guide scope graph - how does it look?

All comments welcome.

Thanks. Russell.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC5128.jpg)
46.7 KB59 views
Click for full-size image (Guide.PNG)
37.2 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-2019, 08:26 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,982
For a single 3 minute sub it is looking good. You appear to be getting round stars and with a Total RMS of 0.85 I'd say you're doing quite well.

As long as you're getting tight round stars then that's all you can ask for
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-08-2019, 08:59 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,045
Russell
Looks very promising for a 1 x 3 minute sub
Imaging with a DSLR , particularly during the summer you will definitely need darks to remove hot pixels and dithered subs to reduce fixed pattern noise
DSLR’s take a hammering in the summer where your sensors electronics can get up to 35 to 40 deg C during long exposures
Looks like your well on your way now with tight stars at 3 minutes , also your total RMS of 0.85 is excellent
Well done !!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2019, 09:14 PM
RussellH
Registered User

RussellH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunny Queensland
Posts: 172
Thanks guys. I am running a dark series just before packing up for the night. Tomorrow will be back to DSS & photoshop to see how the next stage of the process goes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2019, 11:06 PM
Ant0nio's Avatar
Ant0nio (Tony)
Quid Clarius Astris

Ant0nio is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Gympie,Qld. Australia
Posts: 434
to the forum Russell. Your 3 min sub is looking good & guiding right off the bat is great way to start, well done & keep posting.
Cheers,
Tony
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-08-2019, 11:33 PM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Blasted show off
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-08-2019, 01:09 PM
RussellH
Registered User

RussellH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunny Queensland
Posts: 172
Would you believe my camera battery died on the last Dark frame last night? Could be a problem as I'd only used it for 2 nights, a couple hours each night. it is the original battery though, so capacity may be down. I have a generic spare from eBay, so we'll see how it goes.

Here's my first attempt at a processed image. It's kind of tricky keeping the noise out but the detail in. I'm using the trial of StarTools to see if I can work with it. Seems nice so far, but lots to figure out. The attached picture is just a 50% screen grab from where I got to when I seem to have gotten all I can from the image with my limited experience. Not sure if I went too far with the noise reduction, not that you'll be able to tell in this scrunched down forum version of the file anyway.

Russell

*edit* added a 100% crop on the galaxy
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC5128-v1.jpg)
151.2 KB14 views
Click for full-size image (NGC5128-v1-centre-crop.jpg)
48.3 KB19 views

Last edited by RussellH; 25-08-2019 at 01:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-08-2019, 01:47 PM
RyanJones
Registered User

RyanJones is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Posts: 1,439
Fantastic first effort Russell ! 2 tips I’ll offer you with regards to DSLR capture. Firstly Darks will make a huge difference to how much you can stretch the image in post processing. As to how many that’s up for debate. I generally work around 10-15. I do however tend to take a few while I’m setting up my guider at the start of a session as well as at the end to capture darks at the varied temperatures throughout the night. Flats also make a big difference when you’re stretching the image as they will give you an even luminance across the image. The second tip is to stack more images, even if you have to spread the capture over a couple of sessions. This will again give you the ability to extract more data from the noise.

In any case, what you have done for a first effort is excellent and you should be very proud of what you’ve achieved! Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-08-2019, 03:31 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,045
Great result Russell
Well done !
Startools has so much to offer , I can give some tips later on whenever you get more proficient
I usually take 15 darks for up to 40 subs and 20 darks for anything above 40 subs
Darks work better if you take them after your subs as your sensor temperature will be closer to your sub temperature , the closer the better
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-08-2019, 03:46 PM
RussellH
Registered User

RussellH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sunny Queensland
Posts: 172
Thanks for the comments.

I wanted to do 40 subs, but time was against me. Wasn't sure on the exposure length either. I originally did 4 1600 ISO subs and a quick stage to see if it was pulling any details, and it seemed OK. I was going to drop the ISO to 400, but that would have doubled the capture time, so I stuck with 800 as a compromise.

Oddly while doing the first 4 subs, in the second one, the stars showed a short straight trail with about 5 brighter spots along it, as if the telescope moved sideways and stopped briefly each time. The only thing I an think of is if my dogs went out and were bumping the mount or something. Not sure what else would explain it except and earthquake....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-08-2019, 03:51 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,921
Hi Russell
You have done very well.
When using a DSLR I have one battery in the camera, a charged one in my pocket, and one charging. When you start to do a large number of subs you may be surprised how fast they run down.
I look forward to seeing more ...I think you may leave us all behind with a start like that.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25-08-2019, 07:51 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,045
Russell
You will find your ISO sweet spot at ISO 800 for the 450D but experiment with it all the same
My 600D is left on ISO 800 for all my images in all sky conditions and targets
Remember to view your histogram when evaluating your exposure time and ISO after a test sub
Usually subs sitting at 1/3 across is a good bench mark but not any further
Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement