Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 3.33 average.
  #1  
Old 07-12-2005, 07:40 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,760
Exclamation Article: Part 2 - What's Wrong with each of my Scopes

Hi all.

Brian (Miaplacidus) has written a fantastic 2-part article for beginners.. this is the second part. It's well worth a read.

You can access the article from the Projects, Articles and DIY section of the site, or directly from the link below:

Part Two: What's Wrong with each of my Scopes

Thanks to Brian for writing such a comprehensive and complete article to help out the beginners.

Last edited by iceman; 07-12-2005 at 08:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:29 AM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
And again, Brilliant!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2005, 09:13 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Again, fantastic!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2005, 11:09 AM
chunkylad's Avatar
chunkylad (David)
Open up. it's me, Dave...

chunkylad is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Townsville, Qld
Posts: 282
What a great read!!! Ireally enjoyed both the content and the writing style. Congrats Brian;well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2005, 11:18 AM
Hitchhiker's Avatar
Hitchhiker
knows where his towel is

Hitchhiker is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW
Posts: 371
Parts I & II should be required reading for all beginners!

Well done, Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2005, 11:34 AM
33South's Avatar
33South (Chris)
Registered User

33South is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wentworth Falls NSW
Posts: 1,112
Great stuff, I could relate to the ETX105 bit.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2005, 07:47 PM
fringe_dweller's Avatar
fringe_dweller
on the highway to Hell

fringe_dweller is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,623
I tips me hat, sir ...so in conclusion dobbies rule! (if you are on a budget) cant repeat that message too much methinks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:07 PM
G00GS's Avatar
G00GS
Registered User

G00GS is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 22
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:31 PM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
Read both articles. All I can say is thanx, I learnt heaps
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:53 PM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
Thanks for your positive comments, guys. (Now I'll just wait for the lawsuits to pour in.)

Seriously, reading over these articles again, I feel I was a bit harsh on both the ETX and the Megrez. I probably use the Megrez far more than any other scope at the moment. And I DO actually have a list of the SAOs of nearly every interesting double star south of declination +50 (I've even used an Excel scatter chart to turn it into a sort of star chart), so suddenly I find that the ETX has increased my potential observing opportunities to include even nights with a full moon. (Both these preferences probably reflect where I live. When you practise astronomy in cloudy Hobart, you have to maximize every opportunity you can!)

Anyway, guys, get stuck in. Aren't you all going to leap to the defence of your respective telescopes (and start denigrating all the others)? Else, where is the fun in writing the articles???!!!!

Cheers,

Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-12-2005, 09:26 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
brian, how can it be attacked????

as you say, nothing is perfect, and yet most guys will not tell the noobie what is wrong with their scopes.

you have pointed out what is wrong. so unless you have made it up, then you can't be attacked.

if you had simply said a dob is best and left it at that, then "gloves are off".

but no, you have written a very very good article.

now all ou have to do is bring that to our little launceston get together.

actually, i am trying to organise a tassie IIS star camp in the next few years. I drove down the huon valley on business on tuesday, over to rokeby and then up thru cambridge. lots of nice dark sky sites. any tips??? from ross to campbelltown looked lovely and flat 360 degrees. Great lakes?????
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-12-2005, 10:18 PM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,404
Brian, well done, Great article's lots of laughs, mixed with good advice for the beginner.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-12-2005, 04:39 PM
bono
Registered User

bono is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 9
brilliant

Many thanks for the time taken to write this very useful article.

Can anyone suggest for me a $500 equivalent telescope (maybe from Andrews) to your 80 mm F6.25 (500 mm FL) short tube achromatic refractor (William Optics Megrez II SD) ?

I was about to get a DOB, but I see it is still a little too big for my liking.

thanks
Jono
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:39 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bono
I was about to get a DOB, but I see it is still a little too big for my liking.

thanks
Jono
coming to melb to see bono and his mates late march!!

8" dob easy to carry!!! 6" even easier.

i would be interested to know what "too big" is for you?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:07 PM
bono
Registered User

bono is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 9
dobs

Actually a 6" DOB would be right in size. I am all for size and portability, durability, maintainability and versatility (terrestrial viewing?). I'm looking to nurture my beginner enthusiasm for now (quantity over quality I guess).

I'm having my sights set on the april fools concert David. Spent an unfruitful 2 hours trying to get arena tickets for the sydney ticks.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-12-2005, 09:39 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bono
Actually a 6" DOB would be right in size. I am all for size and portability, durability, maintainability and versatility (terrestrial viewing?). I'm looking to nurture my beginner enthusiasm for now (quantity over quality I guess).

I'm having my sights set on the april fools concert David. Spent an unfruitful 2 hours trying to get arena tickets for the sydney ticks.
6" or 8" dob gets ticks on:
size
portability
durability
maintainability

but for terrestrial viewing you would need a right angled finder which i think now comes with most dobs. mine does not so it the view is upside down and back the front.

also i would think a dob too close to the ground to be any good for terrestrial. a refractor on a tripod would be heaps better here!

as they say, have a look through them both and get it clear in your mind!

u2:
we spent 1 hour ringing and got tickets for melbourne, but with the damn comm games are on and accomodation in melb is sky high. got a mate in the city where i can crash!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-12-2005, 05:13 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,760
bono, where abouts in Sydney are you?

Your best bet would be to come to one of our Sydney or Central Coast meetups and look through some telescopes yourself!

We're having one at Kulnura tomorrow night. Don't forget the Lostock AstroCamp in January as well, would be a great place for beginners to learn the ropes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-12-2005, 05:14 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,760
Quote:
but for terrestrial viewing you would need a right angled finder which i think now comes with most dobs
I don't think the last part is correct Dave.. that is, dobs rarely (if ever) come with right angle diagonal (I assume you mean diagonal instead of finder?).

Reflectors aren't really meant for terrestrial viewing, though of course they can be used that way if you like looking at upside down trees
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-12-2005, 06:36 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
(I assume you mean diagonal instead of finder?).

Reflectors aren't really meant for terrestrial viewing, though of course they can be used that way if you like looking at upside down trees
spot on mike, that is exactly what i meant, sorry bono
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-12-2005, 06:51 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
I believe the size of the 6 and 8 inchers with respect to tube length and base size is the same for both, with the 6 being a little lighter. If cost isnt a concern go for the 8 if you decide on this type of scope.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement