#1  
Old 14-03-2019, 06:24 AM
infomorph (Sean)
Registered User

infomorph is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2
G'day all

Hi all, I've been lurking here for over a year (although I haven't visited very often tbh), and decided it was time to finally make some belated introductions.

In the next few months, I'm planning on purchasing a scope and mount, and think I have it narrowed down. Going to (probably) go with the Skywatcher BD 120 ED (although as I'm currently in a location that provides free shipping from US Amazon, it'll be called the Skywatcher 120 ProEd). Alongside a HEQ-5 mount.

My wife has a DSLR around the traps somewhere that she doesn't use anymore, so I'm going to try co-opting that for a splash of photography, but the scope will mainly be used for viewing with the kids. We go camping a bit, so it will probably spend a fair bit of time in the back of the patrol.

Anyway, great to finally stop being a lurker!

Cheers,
Sean
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-03-2019, 06:32 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,980
So you’re the one that’s been spying on us all along
You’ve picked a great setup to start off with, the 120ED punches above its weight and will throw up some great moon and planetary views.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-03-2019, 11:48 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 16,866
Welcome Sean
While you are waiting read up on polar alignment and focuser masks...getting a good polar alignment and focus makes a huge difference.
Good luck and make sure to post your first effort and the story of your adventure.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-03-2019, 09:57 PM
Rkonrad's Avatar
Rkonrad (Richard)
Registered User

Rkonrad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 103
Welcome to the forums Sean that will be a nice set up good luck
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-03-2019, 02:41 AM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Welcome

You say

it'll be called the Skywatcher 120 ProEd

The ED120 Pro is this

http://www.opticalvision.co.uk/astro...refractor.html

Which is what i have and I was told is too heavy with accessories for the HEQ5 if you want to stay under the 60% capacity of the mount, or do you mean this one

The ED DS Pro 120 EVOSTAR (I know they can be different names where you are in the world which really confuses me)

Whichever, nice scope, just remember to take into account camera, 2" diagonal etc weights
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (P1050532.jpg)
170.1 KB27 views
Click for full-size image (P1050599.jpg)
45.6 KB29 views
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-03-2019, 10:27 AM
LaughingBeagles's Avatar
LaughingBeagles (Peter)
Registered User

LaughingBeagles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Ocean Reef, Western Australia
Posts: 105
Welcome mate.

My wife and I go a fair bit of camping in our GU Patrol and more often than not throw in the Explore Scientific ED102CF. I can totally relate.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-03-2019, 02:19 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Jeremy, two points; firstly, the HEQ5 and NEQ6 are both very conservatively rated, and will happily accept larger[heavier] scopes than their rating would suggest. Secondly, the general consensus seems to be 75%, not 60.
I used my HEQ5 with an 8" f/5 Newt + DSLR+ coma corrector+ electric
focuser+9x50 R/A finderscope+ D.I.Y. tube rotating device for years
at approx 80% of visual rating, and I know of at least one member here who
ran a 10" f/4 Newt on his HEQ5 at around 110-115% with some success.
If Sean is going to be travelling around with his gear, the last thing he needs is to add even more kgs by getting an NEQ6 or similar. Just my opinion.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-03-2019, 07:29 PM
Ukastronomer (Jeremy)
Feel free to edit my imag

Ukastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Llandysul, WALES, UK
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
Jeremy, two points; firstly, the HEQ5 and NEQ6 are both very conservatively rated, and will happily accept larger[heavier] scopes than their rating would suggest. Secondly, the general consensus seems to be 75%, not 60.
I used my HEQ5 with an 8" f/5 Newt + DSLR+ coma corrector+ electric
focuser+9x50 R/A finderscope+ D.I.Y. tube rotating device for years
at approx 80% of visual rating, and I know of at least one member here who
ran a 10" f/4 Newt on his HEQ5 at around 110-115% with some success.
If Sean is going to be travelling around with his gear, the last thing he needs is to add even more kgs by getting an NEQ6 or similar. Just my opinion.
raymo

I was saying that because I was unclear of what scope he was talking about Esprit or ED, but I have always read that you should not exceed 60% payload capacity, is that wrong ?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-03-2019, 07:51 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,430
Don't lurk my friend join in and learn heaps.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-03-2019, 08:16 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Every imager has his/her own thoughts on imaging payload percentage.
The HEQ5 and NEQ6 are built like brick outhouses, and provided that the rig is properly balanced, the motors draw within their rated current even when loaded a little over the max visual payload.[ I checked for myself]. The real
limiting factor is not so much the weight, as the length[windage] of the scope;
it also helps a lot to have a long dovetail so the tube rings can be as far apart as is practical.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-03-2019, 11:03 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 5,990
My 2 cents....
Factors relating to your mount and imaging
Telescope type
Payload
Wind
Flexure
Long exposures vs short exposures
Guiding
Dithering

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-03-2019, 11:16 PM
Outcast's Avatar
Outcast (Carlton)
Always gonna be a NOOB...

Outcast is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cairns, Qld
Posts: 1,285
Welcome to the fold Sean, lots of great information on this site & lots of fantastic folk who are more than willing to help answer your questions, give helpful feedback on your progress & problems.

Many very experienced folks on here & many of us who are at different points along our Astronomy / Astrophotography journey who can relate very closely to the problems encountered when starting out..

Use the search function regularly, browse through the various sections & threads... lots & lots of information, just can take a bit to find the bit you want or need... if you can't find it, just ask... someone will jump in & either answer directly or link you to a relevant thread...

Enjoy the journey, it is fantastic.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement